Bi-national survey of Korea and Japan related to the injection site for ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion blocks and anatomic comparisons using cadaver dissection.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
16
08
2019
accepted:
18
04
2020
entrez:
2
5
2020
pubmed:
2
5
2020
medline:
31
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aims of this study were to investigate the current clinical practice of ultrasound (US)-guided stellate ganglion block (SGB) using a bi-national survey of Korea and Japan, and to clarify the anatomical relation of the cervical sympathetic trunk with the prevertebral fascia at the level of cervical vertebrae. The current clinical practice of US-guided SGB in Korea and Japan was investigated using an Internet survey, which received 206 (10.2%) replies from Korea and 97 (8.8%) replies from Japan. The survey questionnaire addressed the actual clinical practice for US-guided SGB, including where the tip of the injection needle is placed. Additionally, 16 half necks of 8 embalmed cadavers were used in an anatomical study. An in-plane needle approach technique and administering 5 ml of local anesthetic were preferred in both countries. However, the type of local anesthetic differed, being lidocaine in Korea and mepivacaine in Japan. The final position of the needle tip also clearly differed in an US image, being predominantly positioned above the prevertebral fascia in Korea (39.3%) and under the prevertebral fascia in Japan (59.8%). In all of the anatomic dissections, the cervical sympathetic trunk was over the prevertebral fascia at the level of the sixth vertebra and under the prevertebral fascia at the level of the seventh vertebra. These results are expected to improve the knowledge on the current clinical practice and to suggest future studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32357174
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232586
pii: PONE-D-19-23153
pmc: PMC7194360
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anesthetics, Local
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0232586Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Radiology. 1993 Sep;188(3):707-9
pubmed: 8351337
Pain Physician. 2000 Jul;3(3):294-304
pubmed: 16906187
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):475-9
pubmed: 19920422
Reg Anesth. 1992 Nov-Dec;17(6):340-7
pubmed: 1363053
Anesthesiology. 2001 Feb;94(2):358-9
pubmed: 11176103
Korean J Pain. 2013 Apr;26(2):111-24
pubmed: 23614071
Anesth Analg. 2007 Aug;105(2):550-1
pubmed: 17646541
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Apr 16;:
pubmed: 30992414
Reg Anesth. 1992 Mar-Apr;17(2):78-83
pubmed: 1581263
Pain Physician. 2004 Jul;7(3):327-31
pubmed: 16858470
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):377-391
pubmed: 28272291
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014 Jun;18(6):424
pubmed: 24760493
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):573-83
pubmed: 11097663
Reg Anesth. 1995 Jul-Aug;20(4):323-8
pubmed: 7577781
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;23(5):516-9
pubmed: 9773708
Can J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;59(11):1040-7
pubmed: 22956268
Am J Surg. 1951 Sep;82(3):344-8
pubmed: 14868824
Anaesthesia. 2011 Jul;66(7):611-4
pubmed: 21627622