Efficacy and Safety of a 0.1% Tacrolimus Nasal Ointment as a Treatment for Epistaxis in Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial.
epistaxis
genetic disease
hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia
nasal ointment
nosebleeds
rare disease
tacrolimus
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Apr 2020
26 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
06
04
2020
revised:
17
04
2020
accepted:
20
04
2020
entrez:
3
5
2020
pubmed:
3
5
2020
medline:
3
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia is a rare but ubiquitous genetic disease. Epistaxis is the most frequent and life-threatening manifestation and tacrolimus, an immunosuppressive agent, appears to be an interesting new treatment option because of its anti-angiogenic properties. Our objective was to evaluate, six weeks after the end of the treatment, the efficacy on the duration of nosebleeds of tacrolimus nasal ointment, administered for six weeks to patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia complicated by nosebleeds, and we performed a prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, ratio 1:1 phase II study. Patients were recruited from three French Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) centers between May 2017 and August 2018, with a six-week follow-up, and we included people aged over 18 years, diagnosed with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and epistaxis (total duration > 30 min/6 weeks prior to inclusion). Tacrolimus ointment 0.1% was self-administered by the patients twice daily. About 0.1 g of product was to be administered in each nostril with a cotton swab. A total of 50 patients was randomized and treated. Mean epistaxis duration before and after treatment in the tacrolimus group were 324.64 and 249.14 min, respectively, and in the placebo group 224.69 and 188.14 min, respectively. Epistaxis duration improved in both groups, with no significant difference in our main objective comparing epistaxis before and after treatment (
Identifiants
pubmed: 32357559
pii: jcm9051262
doi: 10.3390/jcm9051262
pmc: PMC7287684
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
ID : PHRC 2016
Organisme : undefined <span style="color:gray;font-size:10px;">undefined</span>
ID : AMRO
Références
Nat Med. 2010 Apr;16(4):420-8
pubmed: 20364125
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;36(3):654-63
pubmed: 17440024
JAMA. 2016 Sep 6;316(9):934-42
pubmed: 27599328
Genet Med. 2007 Jan;9(1):14-22
pubmed: 17224686
J Thromb Haemost. 2010 Jul;8(7):1447-56
pubmed: 20345718
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020 Jan 7;15(1):4
pubmed: 31910860
Mol Pharmacol. 2011 May;79(5):833-43
pubmed: 21310938
N Engl J Med. 1995 Oct 5;333(14):918-24
pubmed: 7666879
J Invest Dermatol. 2005 Apr;124(4):695-9
pubmed: 15816825
J Clin Invest. 2013 Aug;123(8):3600-13
pubmed: 23867624
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014 Apr;28(4):475-82
pubmed: 23451852
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 May;136(5):726-33; discussion 734-5
pubmed: 17478205
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Nov;157(5):1005-12
pubmed: 17935517
Front Genet. 2015 Jan 08;5:456
pubmed: 25620979
Int J Dermatol. 2009 Apr;48(4):348-55
pubmed: 19335418
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
JAMA. 2016 Sep 6;316(9):943-51
pubmed: 27599329
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Mar;35(3):244-9
pubmed: 18269664
Liver Transpl. 2010 Mar;16(3):340-7
pubmed: 20209594
Int J Dermatol. 2016 Jan;55(1):101-5
pubmed: 26147635
Laryngoscope. 2016 May;126(5):1029-32
pubmed: 26393959
Hum Mol Genet. 2017 Dec 15;26(24):4786-4798
pubmed: 28973643
Pulm Circ. 2019 Apr-Jun;9(2):2045894018805406
pubmed: 30260738
JAMA. 2012 Mar 7;307(9):948-55
pubmed: 22396517
Laryngoscope. 2010 Apr;120(4):838-43
pubmed: 20087969