Cues for different diagnostic patterns of interpersonal violence in a psychiatric sample: an observational study.
Gender
Interpersonal violence
Mental illness
Mood disorders
Personality disorders
Psychosis
Young age
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2020
01 05 2020
Historique:
received:
16
07
2019
accepted:
12
04
2020
entrez:
3
5
2020
pubmed:
3
5
2020
medline:
30
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Interpersonal violence has increased as a health concern, especially in psychiatry practice, over the last decades. Nevertheless, most patients with stable mental disorders do not present an increased risk of violence, and mental disorder is not a necessary or sufficient cause of violent behaviours. People with mental disorders endorse more often a number of risk factors for violence that could confound this association, such as young age and male gender. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of age, gender, and diagnosis on reported levels of interpersonal violence in a sample of people with severe mental illness. The sample was composed of 160 inpatients: 73 with a psychosis within the schizophrenia spectrum, 53 with a mood disorder and 34 with a personality disorder. All patients enrolled in the study were assessed for experiences of victimization and perpetration of interpersonal violence using the Karolinska Interpersonal Violence Scale interview. Demographic variables were also collected. Both violence perpetration and victimization negatively correlated with age. Compared to males, females were exposed to higher degree of victimization in childhood and adulthood, whereas males were more involved in the perpetration of violence in childhood. Personality disorders were associated with higher levels of interpersonal violence, both perpetration and victimization; an interaction effect of gender and diagnosis was also observed for violence perpetration in adulthood. Distinct patterns of interpersonal violence did emerge for the diagnostic groups with mood disorder showing a victimization pattern, personality disorders a perpetration pattern and psychoses less defined patterns. The main finding is that psychotic disorders, mood disorders and personality disorders have different patterns of violent experiences interacting with age and gender. This study offers a better understanding of how gender and age could affect violent behaviours. Moreover, study findings may increase the comprehension of the reason why some mental disorders, compared to others, are more associated with the risk of victimization or perpetration of violence. These patterns could have pathophysiological or pathoplastic meaning addressing clinical and diagnostic trajectories and they could interact with other intervening risk factors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Interpersonal violence has increased as a health concern, especially in psychiatry practice, over the last decades. Nevertheless, most patients with stable mental disorders do not present an increased risk of violence, and mental disorder is not a necessary or sufficient cause of violent behaviours. People with mental disorders endorse more often a number of risk factors for violence that could confound this association, such as young age and male gender. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of age, gender, and diagnosis on reported levels of interpersonal violence in a sample of people with severe mental illness.
METHODS
The sample was composed of 160 inpatients: 73 with a psychosis within the schizophrenia spectrum, 53 with a mood disorder and 34 with a personality disorder. All patients enrolled in the study were assessed for experiences of victimization and perpetration of interpersonal violence using the Karolinska Interpersonal Violence Scale interview. Demographic variables were also collected.
RESULTS
Both violence perpetration and victimization negatively correlated with age. Compared to males, females were exposed to higher degree of victimization in childhood and adulthood, whereas males were more involved in the perpetration of violence in childhood. Personality disorders were associated with higher levels of interpersonal violence, both perpetration and victimization; an interaction effect of gender and diagnosis was also observed for violence perpetration in adulthood. Distinct patterns of interpersonal violence did emerge for the diagnostic groups with mood disorder showing a victimization pattern, personality disorders a perpetration pattern and psychoses less defined patterns.
CONCLUSIONS
The main finding is that psychotic disorders, mood disorders and personality disorders have different patterns of violent experiences interacting with age and gender. This study offers a better understanding of how gender and age could affect violent behaviours. Moreover, study findings may increase the comprehension of the reason why some mental disorders, compared to others, are more associated with the risk of victimization or perpetration of violence. These patterns could have pathophysiological or pathoplastic meaning addressing clinical and diagnostic trajectories and they could interact with other intervening risk factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32357860
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02594-0
pii: 10.1186/s12888-020-02594-0
pmc: PMC7193401
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
196Références
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Feb;260:173-176
pubmed: 29202379
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2015 Sep 17;2:12
pubmed: 26401314
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Apr;262:311-315
pubmed: 29494867
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Jul;81:1-7
pubmed: 28391069
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55942
pubmed: 23418482
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Sep;33(17):2725-2744
pubmed: 26856358
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 14;6:36892
pubmed: 27841333
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 May;63(5):490-9
pubmed: 16651506
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Nov 18;14:312
pubmed: 25403750
Child Abuse Negl. 2018 Dec;86:349-357
pubmed: 30220425
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 Oct 09;10:1925-39
pubmed: 25336958
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;23(3):223-33
pubmed: 21923224
Psychiatr Danub. 2013 Mar;25(1):24-33
pubmed: 23470603
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Apr;262:384-392
pubmed: 28939392
World Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;2(2):121-4
pubmed: 16946914
Lancet. 2002 Oct 5;360(9339):1083-8
pubmed: 12384003
Psychiatry Res. 2015 Jun 30;227(2-3):253-7
pubmed: 25858801
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51740
pubmed: 23300562
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2016 Dec;39(4):701-710
pubmed: 27836162
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(5):535-46
pubmed: 21047165
Forensic Sci Int. 2008 Jul 18;179(1):19-22
pubmed: 18524516
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 23;15:226
pubmed: 26400812
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Nov;66(11):1238-41
pubmed: 26073414
J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;71(8):1025-32
pubmed: 20797380
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2014 Mar;51(1):1-10
pubmed: 28360588
J Public Health (Oxf). 2009 Mar;31(1):162-7
pubmed: 18710888
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;66(2):152-61
pubmed: 19188537
J Interpers Violence. 2017 May 1;:886260517709803
pubmed: 29294762
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 25;17(1):270
pubmed: 28743237
Violence Vict. 2005 Apr;20(2):131-51
pubmed: 16075663
J Interpers Violence. 2012 Apr;27(6):1090-111
pubmed: 22203618
JAMA. 2015 Aug 4;314(5):478-88
pubmed: 26241599
J Pers Disord. 2012 Oct;26(5):775-92
pubmed: 23013345
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 07;16:134
pubmed: 27267456
Contemp Nurse. 2006 May;21(2):277-86
pubmed: 16696610
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jul 07;14:195
pubmed: 25001499
Psychiatry Res. 2005 Sep 15;136(2-3):153-62
pubmed: 16125786
Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):2342-9
pubmed: 24524530
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2019 Oct;207(10):832-837
pubmed: 31365432
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990 Jul;41(7):761-70
pubmed: 2142118
J Affect Disord. 2016 Mar 15;193:89-93
pubmed: 26771949
Law Hum Behav. 2003 Dec;27(6):561-71
pubmed: 14724956