CLASP Mediates Microtubule Repair by Restricting Lattice Damage and Regulating Tubulin Incorporation.
CLASP
TOG2
in vitro reconstitution
laser microsurgery
lattice defects
microtubule catastrophe
microtubule dynamics
microtubule repair
microtubule rescue
tubulin
Journal
Current biology : CB
ISSN: 1879-0445
Titre abrégé: Curr Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9107782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 06 2020
08 06 2020
Historique:
received:
17
10
2019
revised:
05
03
2020
accepted:
27
03
2020
pubmed:
4
5
2020
medline:
11
8
2021
entrez:
4
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Microtubules play a key role in cell division, motility, and intracellular trafficking. Microtubule lattices are generally regarded as stable structures that undergo turnover through dynamic instability of their ends [1]. However, recent evidence suggests that microtubules also exchange tubulin dimers at the sites of lattice defects, which can be induced by mechanical stress, severing enzymes, or occur spontaneously during polymerization [2-6]. Tubulin incorporation can restore microtubule integrity; moreover, "islands" of freshly incorporated GTP-tubulin can inhibit microtubule disassembly and promote rescues [3, 4, 6-8]. Microtubule repair occurs in vitro in the presence of tubulin alone [2-6, 9]. However, in cells, it is likely to be regulated by specific factors, the nature of which is currently unknown. CLASPs are interesting candidates for microtubule repair because they induce microtubule nucleation, stimulate rescue, and suppress catastrophes by stabilizing incomplete growing plus ends with lagging protofilaments and promoting their conversion into complete ones [10-17]. Here, we used in vitro reconstitution assays combined with laser microsurgery and microfluidics to show that CLASP2α indeed stimulates microtubule lattice repair. CLASP2α promoted tubulin incorporation into damaged lattice sites, thereby restoring microtubule integrity. Furthermore, it induced the formation of complete tubes from partial protofilament assemblies and inhibited microtubule softening caused by hydrodynamic-flow-induced bending. The catastrophe-suppressing domain of CLASP2α, TOG2, combined with a microtubule-tethering region, was sufficient to stimulate microtubule repair, suggesting that catastrophe suppression and lattice repair are mechanistically similar. Our results suggest that the cellular machinery controlling microtubule nucleation and growth can also help to maintain microtubule integrity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32359430
pii: S0960-9822(20)30442-5
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.070
pmc: PMC7280784
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
CLASP2 protein, human
0
Microtubule-Associated Proteins
0
Tubulin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2175-2183.e6Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Interests The authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Nat Cell Biol. 2016 Oct;18(10):1054-1064
pubmed: 27617929
Dev Cell. 2014 Aug 11;30(3):343-52
pubmed: 25117684
Curr Biol. 1995 Aug 1;5(8):900-8
pubmed: 7583148
J Cell Biol. 2005 Jan 3;168(1):141-53
pubmed: 15631994
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1997;13:83-117
pubmed: 9442869
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2019 Feb;56:94-101
pubmed: 30453184
Nat Commun. 2015 Oct 06;6:8160
pubmed: 26437877
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30103
pubmed: 22272281
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 28;110(22):8900-5
pubmed: 23674690
Curr Biol. 2016 Dec 19;26(24):3399-3406
pubmed: 27916523
Nat Phys. 2019 Aug;15(8):830-838
pubmed: 31867047
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 13;7:44290
pubmed: 28287156
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018 Feb;50:86-93
pubmed: 29573640
Dev Cell. 2010 Aug 17;19(2):245-58
pubmed: 20708587
Dev Cell. 2007 Jun;12(6):917-30
pubmed: 17543864
J Cell Biol. 1989 Mar;108(3):931-7
pubmed: 2921286
J Cell Biol. 2016 Nov 7;215(3):357-368
pubmed: 27799364
Biophys J. 2016 May 24;110(10):2229-40
pubmed: 27224488
Nat Cell Biol. 2017 Apr;19(4):391-398
pubmed: 28250419
Science. 2018 Aug 24;361(6404):
pubmed: 30139843
Biol Open. 2017 Aug 15;6(8):1245-1256
pubmed: 28663236
Curr Biol. 2016 Jul 11;26(13):1728-1736
pubmed: 27291054
Science. 2008 Nov 28;322(5906):1353-6
pubmed: 18927356
Nat Mater. 2015 Nov;14(11):1156-63
pubmed: 26343914
Nature. 2007 Dec 13;450(7172):1100-5
pubmed: 18059460
Mol Biol Cell. 2018 May 15;29(10):1168-1177
pubmed: 29540526
Structure. 2013 Jun 4;21(6):939-50
pubmed: 23727231
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Jun;6(6):487-98
pubmed: 15928712
Curr Biol. 2019 Jul 22;29(14):2259-2269.e4
pubmed: 31280993
Trends Cell Biol. 2011 Oct;21(10):604-14
pubmed: 21782439
Cell. 2001 Mar 23;104(6):923-35
pubmed: 11290329
Dev Cell. 2018 Jul 2;46(1):40-58.e8
pubmed: 29937387