Long-term Visual Outcomes after Release from Protocol in Patients who Participated in the Inhibition of VEGF in Age-related Choroidal Neovascularisation (IVAN) Trial.


Journal

Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1549-4713
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7802443

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2020
Historique:
received: 05 06 2019
revised: 26 02 2020
accepted: 17 03 2020
pubmed: 4 5 2020
medline: 15 12 2020
entrez: 4 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To describe visual outcomes, frequency of treatment and monitoring visits, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs used in usual care in participants who exited a trial in which treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) was initiated with bevacizumab or ranibizumab. Multicenter cohort study up to 7 years after trial exit. Patients enrolled in the Inhibition of VEGF in Age-related choroidal Neovascularisation (IVAN) trial; after excluding participants from 2 sites and who died or withdrew during the trial, 537 were included in this follow-up cohort. Data were collected between May 26, 2016, and August 24, 2017. Distance visual acuity (DVA) (letters read) in both eyes and treatments for nAMD administered to either eye at all usual care visits were extracted from medical records of all participants until the point of data collection (duration of study eye monitoring). Rate of change of DVA during active surveillance of the study eye (study eye monitoring), estimated using a multivariable linear random effects model. Other outcome measures were visit and treatment frequency and switches in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug. Data were obtained for 99% (532/537) of eligible participants. The median duration of study eye monitoring after IVAN exit was 3.3 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.3-4.7), and median DVA was 58.0 letters (IQR, 34.0-73.0). Study eye DVA deteriorated by 4.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-4.9) letters per year. Injection rate did not influence the rate of change in DVA after adjusting for key covariates. After IVAN exit, 174 participants (32%) received no treatment; 332 of 358 (93%) were treated first with ranibizumab, 78 (23%) of whom switched to aflibercept. The DVA was similar among participants who switched or did not switch at the end of study monitoring. Approximately 5 years after the IVAN study finished, with unprecedented completeness of follow-up for such a trial, the trajectory of functional decline in the study eye was shown to be greater than that previously reported for incomplete trial cohorts. Anti-VEGF injection rates and treatment switches were not important factors in determining visual acuity outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32359843
pii: S0161-6420(20)30303-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.020
pmc: PMC7471837
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Angiogenesis Inhibitors 0
VEGFA protein, human 0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A 0
Bevacizumab 2S9ZZM9Q9V
Ranibizumab ZL1R02VT79

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1191-1200

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 07/36/01
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Ophthalmology. 2014 May;121(5):1092-101
pubmed: 24461586
Ophthalmology. 2019 Jan;126(1):55-63
pubmed: 30077616
Ophthalmology. 2016 Aug;123(8):1751-1761
pubmed: 27156698
Ophthalmology. 2019 May;126(5):735-742
pubmed: 30529685
Ophthalmology. 2015 Sep;122(9):1837-45
pubmed: 26096346
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;95(8):787-795
pubmed: 28834299
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
BMJ. 1994 Apr 2;308(6933):896
pubmed: 8173371
Ophthalmology. 2018 Jul;125(7):1047-1053
pubmed: 29439828
Ophthalmology. 2016 Nov;123(11):2386-2392
pubmed: 27615601
Ophthalmology. 2016 Aug;123(8):1762-1770
pubmed: 27289179
Acta Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;95(8):796-802
pubmed: 28926190
Lancet. 2013 Oct 12;382(9900):1258-67
pubmed: 23870813
Ophthalmology. 2013 Nov;120(11):2292-9
pubmed: 23642856

Auteurs

Rebecca N Evans (RN)

Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Barnaby C Reeves (BC)

Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Dawn Phillips (D)

Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Katherine Alyson Muldrew (KA)

Queen's University of Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Ireland.

Chris Rogers (C)

Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Bristol Trials Centre, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Simon P Harding (SP)

Department of Eye and Vision Science, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Usha Chakravarthy (U)

Queen's University of Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, Ireland. Electronic address: u.chakravarthy@qub.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH