Five pillars for stakeholder analyses in sustainability transformations: The global case of phosphorus.
Agriculture
Food security
Food systems
Natural resources
Phosphorus
Stakeholders
Sustainability
Transformations
Water
Journal
Environmental science & policy
ISSN: 1462-9011
Titre abrégé: Environ Sci Policy
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101561733
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
entrez:
5
5
2020
pubmed:
5
5
2020
medline:
5
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Phosphorus is a critical agricultural nutrient and a major pollutant in waterbodies due to inefficient use. In the form of rock phosphate it is a finite global commodity vulnerable to price shocks and sourcing challenges. Transforming toward sustainable phosphorus management involves local to global stakeholders. Conventional readings of stakeholders may not reflect system complexity leaving it difficult to see stakeholder roles in transformations. We attempt to remedy this issue with a novel stakeholder analysis method based on five qualitative pillars: stakeholder agency, system roles, power and influence, alignment to the problem, and transformational potential. We argue that our approach suits case studies of individual stakeholders, stakeholder groups, and organisations with relationships to sustainability challenges.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32362787
doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.019
pii: S1462-9011(19)31207-9
pmc: PMC7171702
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
80-89Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Chemosphere. 2011 Aug;84(6):747-58
pubmed: 21414650
Science. 2015 Feb 13;347(6223):1259855
pubmed: 25592418
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):3086-91
pubmed: 21282605
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 12;112(19):5979-84
pubmed: 25918372
Ambio. 2020 May;49(5):1076-1089
pubmed: 31542888
Chemosphere. 2011 Aug;84(6):832-9
pubmed: 21429554
J Environ Manage. 2008 Sep;88(4):1580-92
pubmed: 17923247
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Aug 6;53(15):8479-8481
pubmed: 31283194
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Feb;28(2):100-9
pubmed: 23040462
Science. 2018 Aug 10;361(6402):554-556
pubmed: 30093590
Br J Sociol. 2012 Dec;63(4):616-40
pubmed: 23240835
Ambio. 2020 Jan;49(1):208-217
pubmed: 31020612
J Environ Manage. 2009 Apr;90(5):1933-49
pubmed: 19231064
Ambio. 2017 Feb;46(1):30-39
pubmed: 27344324
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:259-277
pubmed: 28125383
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492
pubmed: 30660336
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016 Jul;19(7):435-40
pubmed: 27428031