MRI follow-up after magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for non-invasive thalamotomy: the neuroradiologist's perspective.
Essential tremor
High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation
Magnetic resonance imaging
Parkinson disease
Journal
Neuroradiology
ISSN: 1432-1920
Titre abrégé: Neuroradiology
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 1302751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
05
02
2020
accepted:
07
04
2020
pubmed:
5
5
2020
medline:
28
4
2021
entrez:
5
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) systems are increasingly used to non-invasively treat tremor; consensus on imaging follow-up is poor in these patients. This study aims to elucidate how MRgFUS lesions evolve for a radiological readership with regard to clinical outcome. MRgFUS-induced lesions and oedema were retrospectively evaluated based on DWI, SWI, T2-weighted and T1-weighted 3-T MRI data acquired 30 min and 3, 30 and 180 days after MRgFUS (n = 9 essential tremor, n = 1 Parkinson's patients). Lesions were assessed volumetrically, visually and by ADC measurements and compared with clinical effects using non-parametric testing. Thirty minutes after treatment, all lesions could be identified on T2-weighted images. Immediate oedema was rare (n = 1). Lesion volume as well as oedema reached a maximum on day 3 with a mean lesion size of 0.4 ± 0.2 cm In conclusion, cerebral MRgFUS lesions variably shrink over months. SWI is the sequence of choice to identify lesions after 6 months. Lesion volume is arguably associated with intermediate-term outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32363482
doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02433-9
pii: 10.1007/s00234-020-02433-9
pmc: PMC7410861
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1111-1122Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : 328023777
Références
Acta Radiol. 2015 Dec;56(12):1501-7
pubmed: 25425725
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 May;35(5):891-6
pubmed: 24371027
J Neurosurg. 2019 Jan 25;:1-6
pubmed: 30684946
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;97(Pt 2):163-70
pubmed: 17691301
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 May 09;19:572-580
pubmed: 29984165
J Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;119(2):307-17
pubmed: 23746105
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):730-9
pubmed: 27557301
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57924
pubmed: 23555565
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1412-1418
pubmed: 29084313
Mov Disord. 2016 Aug;31(8):1217-25
pubmed: 27214406
Ann Neurol. 2018 Jan;83(1):107-114
pubmed: 29265546
J Neurosurg. 2019 May 10;:1-8
pubmed: 31075781
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Feb;44(2):E8
pubmed: 29385928
Front Surg. 2019 May 17;6:28
pubmed: 31157233
Mov Disord. 2018 May;33(5):843-847
pubmed: 29701263
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
J Neurosurg. 2018 May 1;:1-10
pubmed: 29799340
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;128(1):202-210
pubmed: 28298022
Radiology. 1993 Oct;189(1):15-26
pubmed: 8372185
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36(5-6):421-9
pubmed: 24281240
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Feb;44(2):E6
pubmed: 29385921
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):162-8
pubmed: 25343176
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Dec 10;6(2):379-385
pubmed: 30847370
J Neurosurg. 1991 Apr;74(4):579-84
pubmed: 2002371