Collagen membranes of dermal and pericardial origin-In vivo evolvement of vascularization over time.
angiogenesis
collagen membrane
dermal
dorsal skinfold chamber
guided bone regeneration
nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite
pericardial
silicon dioxide
vascularization
Journal
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A
ISSN: 1552-4965
Titre abrégé: J Biomed Mater Res A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101234237
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
received:
13
11
2019
revised:
29
03
2020
accepted:
04
04
2020
pubmed:
5
5
2020
medline:
21
10
2021
entrez:
5
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Aim of the study was to compare the evolvement of vascularization over time of collagen membranes (CMs) of dermal and pericardial origin in an in vivo animal study. Twenty-eight mice underwent implantation of three commercially available CM derived from porcine dermis (homogenous structure: CM1 (Control 1) and bilayer structure: CM2 [Control 2]), from porcine pericardium (CM3; Test 1) as well as CM3 sprayed with silica-enhanced nanostructured hydroxyapatite (CM4, Test 2). After 3, 6, 9, and 12 days, intravital fluorescence microscopy was conducted for determination of capillary diameter, density, flow, and length. At Day 12, samples were examined immunohistologically for expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4), CD11b, CD68, αSMA, and CD34. In all CM, intravital fluorescence microscopy over time showed increasing values for all parameters with the highest levels in CM4 and the lowest values in CM1. Significant lower amounts of FGFR4, CD11b, and CD68 were detected in CM4 when compared to CM2 (p < .05). In contrast to CM3, lower values of αSMA and higher numbers of CD34 positive-marked vessels were observed in CM4 (p < .05). In conclusion, dermal bilayer as well as pericardial CM seem to have a higher vascularization rate than dermal homogenous CM. Additional coating of pericardial CM with a silica-enhanced hydroxyapatite increases the speed of vascularization as well as biological remodeling processes.
Substances chimiques
Biocompatible Materials
0
Membranes, Artificial
0
Collagen
9007-34-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2368-2378Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
Abshagen, K., Schrodi, I., Gerber, T., & Vollmar, B. (2009). In vivo analysis of biocompatibility and vascularization of the synthetic bone grafting substitute NanoBone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, 91, 557-566.
Adam, M., Ganz, C., Xu, W., Sarajian, H. R., Gotz, W., & Gerber, T. (2014). In vivo and in vitro investigations of a nanostructured coating material-A preclinical study. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 9, 975-984.
Amorfini, L., Migliorati, M., Signori, A., Silvestrini-Biavati, A., & Benedicenti, S. (2014). Block allograft technique versus standard guided bone regeneration: A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 16, 655-667.
Anderud, J., Jimbo, R., Abrahamsson, P., Isaksson, S. G., Adolfsson, E., Malmstrom, J., … Wennerberg, A. (2014). Guided bone augmentation using a ceramic space-maintaining device. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 118, 532-538.
Blatt, S., Burkhardt, V., Kämmerer, P. W., Pabst, A. M., Sagheb, K., Heller, M., … Schiegnitz, E. (2020). Biofunctionalization of porcine-derived collagen matrices with platelet rich fibrin: Influence on angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Clinical Oral Investigations. [Epub ahead of print].
Bunyaratavej, P., & Wang, H. L. (2001). Collagen membranes: A review. Journal of Periodontology, 72, 215-229.
Caballe-Serrano, J., Munar-Frau, A., Ortiz-Puigpelat, O., Soto-Penaloza, D., Penarrocha, M., & Hernandez-Alfaro, F. (2018). On the search of the ideal barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 10, e477-e483.
Chiapasco, M., & Zaniboni, M. (2009). Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20(Suppl 4), 113-123.
Chu, C., Deng, J., Man, Y., & Qu, Y. (2017). Evaluation of nanohydroxyapaptite (nano-HA) coated epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) cross-linked collagen membranes. Materials Science & Engineering. C, Materials for Biological Applications, 78, 258-264.
Dau, M., Kämmerer, P. W., Henkel, K. O., Gerber, T., Frerich, B., & Gundlach, K. K. (2016). Bone formation in mono cortical mandibular critical size defects after augmentation with two synthetic nanostructured and one xenogenous hydroxyapatite bone substitute-In vivo animal study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 27, 597-603.
De Vriese, A. S., Verbeuren, T. J., Vallez, M. O., Lameire, N. H., De Buyzere, M., & Vanhoutte, P. M. (2000). Off-line analysis of red blood cell velocity in renal arterioles. Journal of Vascular Research, 37, 26-31.
Elgali, I., Omar, O., Dahlin, C., & Thomsen, P. (2017). Guided bone regeneration: Materials and biological mechanisms revisited. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 125, 315-337.
Fujioka-Kobayashi, M., Schaler, B., Shirakata, Y., Nakamura, T., Noguchi, K., Zhang, Y., & Miron, R. J. (2017). Comparison of two porcine collagen membranes combined with rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-9 on osteoblast behavior in vitro. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 32, e221-e230.
Ghanaati, S. (2012). Non-cross-linked porcine-based collagen I-III membranes do not require high vascularization rates for their integration within the implantation bed: A paradigm shift. Acta Biomaterialia, 8, 3061-3072.
Ghanaati, S., Barbeck, M., Lorenz, J., Stuebinger, S., Seitz, O., Landes, C., … Sader, R. A. (2013). Synthetic bone substitute material comparable with xenogeneic material for bone tissue regeneration in oral cancer patients: First and preliminary histological, histomorphometrical and clinical results. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery, 3, 126-138.
Hong, K. S., Kim, E. C., Bang, S. H., Chung, C. H., Lee, Y. I., Hyun, J. K., … Kim, H. W. (2010). Bone regeneration by bioactive hybrid membrane containing FGF2 within rat calvarium. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, 94, 1187-1194.
Kämmerer, P. W., Palarie, V., Schiegnitz, E., Nacu, V., Draenert, F. G., & Al-Nawas, B. (2013). Influence of a collagen membrane and recombinant platelet-derived growth factor on vertical bone augmentation in implant-fixed deproteinized bovine bone-Animal pilot study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24, 1222-1230.
Kämmerer, P. W., Scholz, M., Baudisch, M., Liese, J., Wegner, K., Frerich, B., & Lang, H. (2017). Guided bone regeneration using collagen scaffolds, growth factors, and periodontal ligament stem cells for treatment of peri-implant bone defects in vivo. Stem Cells International, 2017, 3548435.
Keestra, J. A., Barry, O., Jong, L., & Wahl, G. (2016). Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 24, 3-17.
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 1, 94-99.
Klyscz, T., Junger, M., Jung, F., & Zeintl, H. (1997). Cap image-A new kind of computer-assisted video image analysis system for dynamic capillary microscopy. Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical Engineering, 42, 168-175.
Koerdt, S., Ristow, O., Wannhoff, A., Kubler, A. C., & Reuther, T. (2014). Expression of growth factors during the healing process of alveolar ridge augmentation procedures using autogenous bone grafts in combination with GTR and an anorganic bovine bone substitute: An immunohistochemical study in the sheep. Clinical Oral Investigations, 18, 179-188.
Kyyak, S., Blatt, S., Pabst, A., Thiem, D., Al-Nawas, B., & Kämmerer, P. W. (2020). Combination of an allogenic and a xenogenic bone substitute material with injectable platelet-rich fibrin-A comparative in vitro study. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 088532822091440. [Epub ahead of print].
Li, J., Man, Y., Zuo, Y., Zhang, L., Huang, C., Liu, M., & Li, Y. (2011). In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a nHA/PA66 composite membrane for guided bone regeneration. Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition, 22, 263-275.
Liu, J., & Kerns, D. G. (2014). Mechanisms of guided bone regeneration: A review. The Open Dentistry Journal, 8, 56-65.
Lundgren, A., Lundgren, D., & Taylor, A. (1998). Influence of barrier occlusiveness on guided bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rat. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 9, 251-260.
Mahajan, R., Khinda, P., Shewale, A., Ghotra, K., Bhasin, M. T., & Bhasin, P. (2018). Comparative efficacy of placental membrane and healiguide in treatment of gingival recession using guided tissue regeneration. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 22, 513-522.
Mota, J., Yu, N., Caridade, S. G., Luz, G. M., Gomes, M. E., Reis, R. L., … Mano, J. F. (2012). Chitosan/bioactive glass nanoparticle composite membranes for periodontal regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia, 8, 4173-4180.
Naenni, N., Schneider, D., Jung, R. E., Husler, J., Hammerle, C. H. F., & Thoma, D. S. (2017). Randomized clinical study assessing two membranes for guided bone regeneration of peri-implant bone defects: Clinical and histological outcomes at 6 months. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28, 1309-1317.
Oh, S. H., Kim, J. H., Kim, J. M., & Lee, J. H. (2006). Asymmetrically porous PLGA/Pluronic F127 membrane for effective guided bone regeneration. Journal of Biomaterials Science. Polymer Edition, 17, 1375-1387.
Ortolani, E., Quadrini, F., Bellisario, D., Santo, L., Polimeni, A., & Santarsiero, A. (2015). Mechanical qualification of collagen membranes used in dentistry. Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 51, 229-235.
Pabst, A., & Kämmerer, P. W. (2020). Collagen matrices: Opportunities and perspectives in oral hard and soft tissue regeneration. Quintessence International, 51, 318-327.
Park, J. S., Pabst, A. M., Ackermann, M., Moergel, M., Jung, J., & Kasaj, A. (2018). Biofunctionalization of porcine-derived collagen matrix using enamel matrix derivative and platelet-rich fibrin: Influence on mature endothelial cell characteristics in vitro. Clinical Oral Investigations, 22, 909-917.
Rothamel, D., Benner, M., Fienitz, T., Happe, A., Kreppel, M., Nickenig, H. J., & Zoller, J. E. (2014). Biodegradation pattern and tissue integration of native and cross-linked porcine collagen soft tissue augmentation matrices-An experimental study in the rat. Head & Face Medicine, 10, 10.
Rothamel, D., Schwarz, F., Sager, M., Herten, M., Sculean, A., & Becker, J. (2005). Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: An experimental study in the rat. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 16, 369-378.
Schwarz, F., Rothamel, D., Herten, M., Sager, M., & Becker, J. (2006). Angiogenesis pattern of native and cross-linked collagen membranes: An immunohistochemical study in the rat. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 17, 403-409.
Schwarz, F., Rothamel, D., Herten, M., Wustefeld, M., Sager, M., Ferrari, D., & Becker, J. (2008). Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: An experimental study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 19, 402-415.
Sckell, A., & Leunig, M. (2009). The dorsal skinfold chamber: Studying angiogenesis by intravital microscopy. Methods in Molecular Biology, 467, 305-317.
Sckell, A., & Leunig, M. (2016). Dorsal skinfold chamber preparation in mice: Studying angiogenesis by intravital microscopy. Methods in Molecular Biology, 1430, 251-263.
Shim, J. H., Huh, J. B., Park, J. Y., Jeon, Y. C., Kang, S. S., Kim, J. Y., … Cho, D. W. (2013). Fabrication of blended polycaprolactone/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/beta-tricalcium phosphate thin membrane using solid freeform fabrication technology for guided bone regeneration. Tissue Engineering. Part A, 19, 317-328.
Silva, E. C., Omonte, S. V., Martins, A. G., de Castro, H. H., Gomes, H. E., Zenobio, E. G., … Souza, P. E. (2017). Hyaluronic acid on collagen membranes: An experimental study in rats. Archives of Oral Biology, 73, 214-222.
Talebi Ardakani, M. R., Hajizadeh, F., & Yadegari, Z. (2018). Comparison of attachment and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts on different collagen membranes. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery, 8, 218-223.
Teng, S. H., Lee, E. J., Yoon, B. H., Shin, D. S., Kim, H. E., & Oh, J. S. (2009). Chitosan/nanohydroxyapatite composite membranes via dynamic filtration for guided bone regeneration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, 88, 569-580.
Tirri, T., Rich, J., Wolke, J., Seppala, J., Yli-Urpo, A., & Narhi, T. O. (2008). Bioactive glass induced in vitro apatite formation on composite GBR membranes. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine, 19, 2919-2923.
Turri, A., Elgali, I., Vazirisani, F., Johansson, A., Emanuelsson, L., Dahlin, C., … Omar, O. (2016). Guided bone regeneration is promoted by the molecular events in the membrane compartment. Biomaterials, 84, 167-183.