A multinational, prospective, observational study to estimate complete skin clearance in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PSOriasis treated with BIOlogics in a REAL world setting (PSO-BIO-REAL).
Journal
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV
ISSN: 1468-3083
Titre abrégé: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9216037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2020
Nov 2020
Historique:
received:
05
08
2019
accepted:
27
03
2020
pubmed:
5
5
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
5
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23 biologics revolutionized plaque psoriasis treatment by enabling ≥75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) in clinical trials. Modern biologics are now reported to achieve PASI 100 (complete skin clearance) in clinical trials. However, real-world evidence of skin clearance rates with biologics is limited. PSO-BIO-REAL was conducted to understand the real-world burden of plaque psoriasis. The primary objective of this observational study was to estimate the proportion of patients who achieved complete skin clearance at 6 months. Secondary objectives included maintenance of response and evaluation of complete skin clearance at 12 months. PSO-BIO-REAL was a multinational, prospective, real-world, non-interventional study of skin clearance and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with biologics. A total of 846 patients from the United States (32%), France (28%), Italy (22%), the United Kingdom (11%) and Germany (8%) were enrolled and followed for one year. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had initiated a biologic for plaque psoriasis. Patients could be biologic-naïve or switching biologics (biologic-experienced). Assessments were made at baseline and at months 6 and 12. At 6 and 12 months, 23% and 26% of patients achieved complete skin clearance, respectively. Prior to study entry, 60% were biologic-naïve. The proportion of patients achieving complete skin clearance was lower among biologic-experienced patients (20% at both months 6 and 12) compared with biologic-naïve patients (25% at month 6, 30% at month 12). The rate of complete skin clearance decreased as the number of prior biologics and baseline comorbidities increased. Only one in four patients achieved complete skin clearance after 6 months of treatment with biologics. The study indicates there still is an unmet need for more efficacious biologics for patients with psoriasis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23 biologics revolutionized plaque psoriasis treatment by enabling ≥75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) in clinical trials. Modern biologics are now reported to achieve PASI 100 (complete skin clearance) in clinical trials. However, real-world evidence of skin clearance rates with biologics is limited. PSO-BIO-REAL was conducted to understand the real-world burden of plaque psoriasis.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The primary objective of this observational study was to estimate the proportion of patients who achieved complete skin clearance at 6 months. Secondary objectives included maintenance of response and evaluation of complete skin clearance at 12 months.
METHODS
METHODS
PSO-BIO-REAL was a multinational, prospective, real-world, non-interventional study of skin clearance and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with biologics. A total of 846 patients from the United States (32%), France (28%), Italy (22%), the United Kingdom (11%) and Germany (8%) were enrolled and followed for one year. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had initiated a biologic for plaque psoriasis. Patients could be biologic-naïve or switching biologics (biologic-experienced). Assessments were made at baseline and at months 6 and 12.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At 6 and 12 months, 23% and 26% of patients achieved complete skin clearance, respectively. Prior to study entry, 60% were biologic-naïve. The proportion of patients achieving complete skin clearance was lower among biologic-experienced patients (20% at both months 6 and 12) compared with biologic-naïve patients (25% at month 6, 30% at month 12). The rate of complete skin clearance decreased as the number of prior biologics and baseline comorbidities increased.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Only one in four patients achieved complete skin clearance after 6 months of treatment with biologics. The study indicates there still is an unmet need for more efficacious biologics for patients with psoriasis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32364296
doi: 10.1111/jdv.16568
pmc: PMC7818467
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biological Products
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2566-2573Subventions
Organisme : LEO Pharma Research Foundation
Organisme : Amgen
Organisme : AstraZeneca
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.
Références
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Aug 1;16(8):734-741
pubmed: 28809988
J Dermatolog Treat. 2018 Aug;29(5):481-486
pubmed: 29058948
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):345-56
pubmed: 27299809
Drugs Today (Barc). 2010 Apr;46(4):259-64
pubmed: 20502723
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Mar;178(3):674-681
pubmed: 28991370
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Sep;26(9):1033-1039
pubmed: 28913966
Lancet. 2018 Aug 25;392(10148):650-661
pubmed: 30097359
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(14):1318-28
pubmed: 26422722
Lancet. 2005 Oct 15-21;366(9494):1367-74
pubmed: 16226614
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Aug;177(2):587-590
pubmed: 28301048
J Dermatolog Treat. 2015 Jun;26(3):235-9
pubmed: 25078334
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 14;14(8):e0220868
pubmed: 31412060
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jan;76(1):60-69.e9
pubmed: 27663079
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Oct;23 Suppl 2:1-70
pubmed: 19712190
J Drugs Dermatol. 2015 Oct;14(10):1086-8
pubmed: 26461817
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Mar;33(3):553-559
pubmed: 30317679
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Aug;77(2):372-374
pubmed: 28711089
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Mar 31;11:32
pubmed: 21453459
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Jul;75(1):77-82.e7
pubmed: 27206759
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018 Jul;18(7):727-735
pubmed: 29798698
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Aug;175(2):273-86
pubmed: 26914406
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76(3):405-417
pubmed: 28057360
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Oct;71(4):633-41
pubmed: 24928705
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Mar;176(3):786-793
pubmed: 27454758
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Feb;31(2):213-220
pubmed: 27739123
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Apr;4(2):345-51
pubmed: 18728850
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76(3):418-431
pubmed: 28057361
J Dermatolog Treat. 2015 Feb;26(1):49-53
pubmed: 24552591