Simultaneous totally robotic rectal resection and partial nephrectomy: case report and review of literature.
Anastomosis, Surgical
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
/ pathology
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ pathology
Female
Humans
Kidney
/ pathology
Kidney Neoplasms
/ pathology
Middle Aged
Neoplasms, Multiple Primary
/ pathology
Nephrectomy
/ methods
Operative Time
Proctectomy
/ methods
Rectum
/ pathology
Robotic Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Anterior rectal resection
Colorectal cancer
Colorectal tumor
Combined robotic surgery
Kidney tumor
Nephrectomy
Partial nephrectomy
Renal tumor
Robotic
Synchronous tumors
Journal
World journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1477-7819
Titre abrégé: World J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170544
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 May 2020
04 May 2020
Historique:
received:
05
01
2020
accepted:
21
04
2020
entrez:
6
5
2020
pubmed:
6
5
2020
medline:
9
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The incidence of synchronous RCC and colorectal cancer is heterogeneous ranging from 0.03 to 4.85%. Instead, only one case of huge colon carcinoma and renal angiomyolipoma was reported. The treatment of synchronous kidney and colorectal neoplasm is, preferably, synchronous resection. Currently, laparoscopic approach has shown to be feasible and safe, and it has become the gold standard of synchronous resection due to advantages of minimally invasive surgery. We presented a case synchronous renal neoplasm and colorectal cancer undergone simultaneous totally robotic renal enucleation and rectal resection with primary intracorporeal anastomosis. As our knowledge, this is the first case in literature of simultaneous robotic surgery for renal and colorectal tumor. A 53-year-old woman was affected by recto-sigmoid junction cancer and a solid 5 cm left renal mass. We performed a simultaneous robotic low anterior rectal resection and renal enucleation. Total operative time was 260 min with robotic time of 220 min; estimated blood loss was 150 ml; time to flatus was 72 h, and oral diet was administered 4 days after surgery. The patient was discharged on the eighth post-operative day without peri- and post-operative complication. The definitive histological examination showed a neuroendocrine tumor pT2N1 G2, with negative circumferential and distal resection margins. Renal tumor was angiomyolipoma. At 23 months follow-up, the patient is recurrence free. As our knowledge, we described the first case in literature of simultaneous robotic anterior rectal resection and partial nephrectomy for treatment of colorectal tumor and renal mass. Robotic rectal resection with intracorporeal anastomosis surgery seems to be feasible and safe even when it is associated with simultaneous partial nephrectomy. Many features of robotic technology could be useful in combined surgery. This strategy is recommended only when patients' medical conditions allow for longer anesthesia exposure. The advantages are to avoid a delay treatment of second tumor, to reduce the time to start the post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy, to avoid a second anesthetic procedure, and to reduce the patient discomfort. However, further studies are needed to evaluate robotic approach as standard surgical strategy for simultaneous treatment of colorectal and renal neoplasm.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32366262
doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01864-1
pii: 10.1186/s12957-020-01864-1
pmc: PMC7199338
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
86Références
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004 Jun;14(3):179-81
pubmed: 15245672
G Chir. 2013 Apr;34(4):132-4
pubmed: 23660167
Urology. 2001 Dec;58(6):864-9
pubmed: 11744447
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct;38(10):710-4
pubmed: 18845524
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb 28;18(8):806-13
pubmed: 22371641
J Belg Soc Radiol. 2018 Apr 20;102(1):41
pubmed: 30039053
Onco Targets Ther. 2013 Apr 10;6:355-60
pubmed: 23596352
BJU Int. 2006 Apr;97(4):698-702
pubmed: 16536756
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Sep;43(9):1314-5
pubmed: 11005504
Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Mar-Apr;40(2):279-80
pubmed: 24856498
Chir Ital. 2003 Nov-Dec;55(6):903-6
pubmed: 14725233
BMJ Case Rep. 2015 Sep 29;2015:
pubmed: 26420697
ESMO Open. 2017 May 2;2(2):e000172
pubmed: 28761745
ISRN Surg. 2011;2011:179456
pubmed: 22084746
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006 Jun;16(3):297-300
pubmed: 16796445
Surg Today. 2009;39(8):728-32
pubmed: 19639445
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Aug;35(8):844-51
pubmed: 18976878
Am Surg. 2001 Dec;67(12):1162-4
pubmed: 11768821
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Aug;17(4):283-6
pubmed: 17710049
World J Urol. 2015 Mar;33(3):427-32
pubmed: 24903348
BMC Surg. 2018 Jun 13;18(1):40
pubmed: 29895293
Cir Esp. 2015 Apr;93(4):266-8
pubmed: 25022848
Arch Intern Med. 2008 May 12;168(9):1003-9
pubmed: 18474765
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;51:323-327
pubmed: 30245354
Scott Med J. 2011 Aug;56(3):181
pubmed: 21873728
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006 Jan;21(1):92-3
pubmed: 15668786
Am J Med. 1989 Dec;87(6):691-3
pubmed: 2686436