The role of baseline BLyS levels and type 1 interferon-inducible gene signature status in determining belimumab response in systemic lupus erythematosus: a post hoc meta-analysis.
B cell activating factor
B lymphocyte stimulator
Belimumab
Interferon
Messenger RNA
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Journal
Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 05 2020
04 05 2020
Historique:
received:
22
10
2019
accepted:
31
03
2020
entrez:
6
5
2020
pubmed:
6
5
2020
medline:
17
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Elevated B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) correlate positively with disease activity; BLyS expression is directly linked to interferon (IFN) pathway activation. This post hoc meta-analysis of BLISS-52 and BLISS-76 explored the relationship between baseline BLyS mRNA/protein levels and/or type 1 IFN-inducible gene signature (IFN-1) and responses to the BLyS-targeting monoclonal antibody belimumab in SLE. In BLISS-52 and BLISS-76, patients with autoantibody-positive SLE and a SELENA-SLEDAI score ≥ 6 and receiving stable standard SLE therapy were randomised to intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo, plus standard of care (SoC), for 52 or 76 weeks. For this post hoc meta-analysis, patients with an appropriate mRNA sample were stratified by BLyS mRNA expression (tertiles: high/medium/low; revised quantiles: high/low), IFN-1 mRNA expression (high/low) and BLyS protein level (high/low). Co-primary endpoints were correlation between baseline BLyS and IFN-1 mRNA levels and SLE Responder Index (SRI)4 response at week 52 within BLyS/IFN-1 subgroups. Secondary endpoints included time to first severe SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) flare. Of 554 patients included in this analysis, 281 had received belimumab and 273 had received placebo. Baseline BLyS and IFN-1 mRNA levels were highly correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.7799; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7451, 0.8106; p < 0.0001). The proportion of SRI4 responders was higher with belimumab versus placebo in all subgroups, but the difference reached statistical significance in the medium BLyS mRNA tertile (odds ratio [OR] 2.17; 95% CI 1.16, 4.04; p = 0.0153), high BLyS mRNA quantile (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.02, 2.44; p = 0.0402), high IFN-1 mRNA (OR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.31; p = 0.0186) and high BLyS protein (OR 3.57; 95% CI 1.63, 7.83; p = 0.0015) subgroups only. The risk of severe SFI flare was significantly lower with belimumab than placebo in the high BLyS mRNA quantile (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59; 95% CI 0.36, 0.97; p = 0.0371) and high BLyS protein (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19, 0.79; p = 0.0090) subgroups. This post hoc meta-analysis demonstrated a tendency towards improved response to add-on intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg versus SoC alone in patients with high baseline BLyS protein and IFN-1 mRNA levels and medium/high BLyS mRNA levels.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Elevated B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) correlate positively with disease activity; BLyS expression is directly linked to interferon (IFN) pathway activation. This post hoc meta-analysis of BLISS-52 and BLISS-76 explored the relationship between baseline BLyS mRNA/protein levels and/or type 1 IFN-inducible gene signature (IFN-1) and responses to the BLyS-targeting monoclonal antibody belimumab in SLE.
METHODS
In BLISS-52 and BLISS-76, patients with autoantibody-positive SLE and a SELENA-SLEDAI score ≥ 6 and receiving stable standard SLE therapy were randomised to intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo, plus standard of care (SoC), for 52 or 76 weeks. For this post hoc meta-analysis, patients with an appropriate mRNA sample were stratified by BLyS mRNA expression (tertiles: high/medium/low; revised quantiles: high/low), IFN-1 mRNA expression (high/low) and BLyS protein level (high/low). Co-primary endpoints were correlation between baseline BLyS and IFN-1 mRNA levels and SLE Responder Index (SRI)4 response at week 52 within BLyS/IFN-1 subgroups. Secondary endpoints included time to first severe SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) flare.
RESULTS
Of 554 patients included in this analysis, 281 had received belimumab and 273 had received placebo. Baseline BLyS and IFN-1 mRNA levels were highly correlated (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.7799; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7451, 0.8106; p < 0.0001). The proportion of SRI4 responders was higher with belimumab versus placebo in all subgroups, but the difference reached statistical significance in the medium BLyS mRNA tertile (odds ratio [OR] 2.17; 95% CI 1.16, 4.04; p = 0.0153), high BLyS mRNA quantile (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.02, 2.44; p = 0.0402), high IFN-1 mRNA (OR 1.58; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.31; p = 0.0186) and high BLyS protein (OR 3.57; 95% CI 1.63, 7.83; p = 0.0015) subgroups only. The risk of severe SFI flare was significantly lower with belimumab than placebo in the high BLyS mRNA quantile (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59; 95% CI 0.36, 0.97; p = 0.0371) and high BLyS protein (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19, 0.79; p = 0.0090) subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS
This post hoc meta-analysis demonstrated a tendency towards improved response to add-on intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg versus SoC alone in patients with high baseline BLyS protein and IFN-1 mRNA levels and medium/high BLyS mRNA levels.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32366280
doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02177-0
pii: 10.1186/s13075-020-02177-0
pmc: PMC7197114
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
B-Cell Activating Factor
0
Interferon Type I
0
RNA, Messenger
0
TNFSF13B protein, human
0
belimumab
73B0K5S26A
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102Références
Toxicol Sci. 2006 Jun;91(2):586-99
pubmed: 16517838
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;69(2):376-386
pubmed: 28130918
J Rheumatol. 2008 Jul;35(7):1256-64
pubmed: 18528969
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2550-7
pubmed: 16868977
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Aug;58(8):2453-9
pubmed: 18668552
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jun;78(6):736-745
pubmed: 30926722
J Exp Med. 2000 Oct 2;192(7):953-64
pubmed: 11015437
Science. 1999 Jul 9;285(5425):260-3
pubmed: 10398604
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Sep;42(9):1785-96
pubmed: 10513791
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Dec;63(12):3918-30
pubmed: 22127708
Lupus. 2016 Apr;25(4):346-54
pubmed: 26385220
Lupus Sci Med. 2015 Jun 18;2(1):e000063
pubmed: 26113988
Curr Biol. 2001 Dec 11;11(24):1986-9
pubmed: 11747827
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Nov;48(11):3253-65
pubmed: 14613291
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Dec;48(12):3475-86
pubmed: 14673998
Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(1):R6
pubmed: 16356193
J Immunol. 2001 Jan 1;166(1):6-10
pubmed: 11123269
Lancet. 2011 Feb 26;377(9767):721-31
pubmed: 21296403
Lancet. 2007 Feb 17;369(9561):587-96
pubmed: 17307106
J Immunol. 2016 Jan 1;196(1):91-6
pubmed: 26590315
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Jun;44(6):1313-9
pubmed: 11407690
J Clin Invest. 2003 Jul;112(2):286-97
pubmed: 12865416