Primary care use and cardiovascular disease risk in Russian 40-69 year olds: a cross-sectional study.

Clinical epidemiology Cost effective Disease modelling Eastern Europe Economic evaluation Environmental health Epidemiology Health services International health Lifestyle Policy Public health

Journal

Journal of epidemiology and community health
ISSN: 1470-2738
Titre abrégé: J Epidemiol Community Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909766

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2020
Historique:
received: 21 11 2019
revised: 04 03 2020
accepted: 14 04 2020
pubmed: 6 5 2020
medline: 3 9 2021
entrez: 6 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Russian Federation has very high cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality rates compared with countries of similar economic development. This cross-sectional study compares the characteristics of CVD-free participants with and without recent primary care contact to ascertain their CVD risk and health status. A total of 2774 participants aged 40-69 years with no self-reported CVD history were selected from a population-based study conducted in Arkhangelsk and Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 2015-2018. A range of co-variates related to socio-demographics, health and health behaviours were included. Recent primary care contact was defined as seeing primary care doctor in the past year or having attended a general health check under the 2013 Dispansarisation programme. The proportion with no recent primary care contact was 32.3% (95% CI 29.7% to 35.0%) in males, 16.3% (95% CI 14.6% to 18.2%) in females, and 23.1% (95% CI 21.6% to 24.7%) overall. In gender-specific age-adjusted analyses, no recent contact was also associated with low education, smoking, very good to excellent self-rated health, no chest pain, CVD 10-year SCORE risk 5+%, absence of hypertension control, absence of hypertension awareness and absence of care-intensive conditions. Among those with no contact: 37% current smokers, 34% with 5+% 10-year CVD risk, 32% untreated hypertension, 20% non-anginal chest pain, 18% problem drinkers, 14% uncontrolled hypertension and 9% Grade 1-2 angina. The proportion without general health check attendance was 54.6%. Primary care and community interventions would be required to proactively reach sections of 40-69 year olds currently not in contact with primary care services to reduce their CVD risk through diagnosis, treatment, lifestyle recommendations and active follow-up.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The Russian Federation has very high cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality rates compared with countries of similar economic development. This cross-sectional study compares the characteristics of CVD-free participants with and without recent primary care contact to ascertain their CVD risk and health status.
METHODS
A total of 2774 participants aged 40-69 years with no self-reported CVD history were selected from a population-based study conducted in Arkhangelsk and Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 2015-2018. A range of co-variates related to socio-demographics, health and health behaviours were included. Recent primary care contact was defined as seeing primary care doctor in the past year or having attended a general health check under the 2013 Dispansarisation programme.
RESULTS
The proportion with no recent primary care contact was 32.3% (95% CI 29.7% to 35.0%) in males, 16.3% (95% CI 14.6% to 18.2%) in females, and 23.1% (95% CI 21.6% to 24.7%) overall. In gender-specific age-adjusted analyses, no recent contact was also associated with low education, smoking, very good to excellent self-rated health, no chest pain, CVD 10-year SCORE risk 5+%, absence of hypertension control, absence of hypertension awareness and absence of care-intensive conditions. Among those with no contact: 37% current smokers, 34% with 5+% 10-year CVD risk, 32% untreated hypertension, 20% non-anginal chest pain, 18% problem drinkers, 14% uncontrolled hypertension and 9% Grade 1-2 angina. The proportion without general health check attendance was 54.6%.
CONCLUSION
Primary care and community interventions would be required to proactively reach sections of 40-69 year olds currently not in contact with primary care services to reduce their CVD risk through diagnosis, treatment, lifestyle recommendations and active follow-up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32366586
pii: jech-2019-213549
doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213549
pmc: PMC7577087
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

692-967

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Eur Heart J. 2018 Feb 14;39(7):508-579
pubmed: 29190377
Maturitas. 2012 Dec;73(4):295-9
pubmed: 23007006
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 May;68(670):e370-e377
pubmed: 29686130
Health Policy. 2018 Oct;122(10):1055-1062
pubmed: 30100528
Blood Press. 2018 Dec;27(6):314-340
pubmed: 30380928
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 5;367(1):20-9
pubmed: 22762315
Lancet. 2002 Dec 14;360(9349):1903-13
pubmed: 12493255
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S48-S54
pubmed: 28529922
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Jan;61(582):e1-11
pubmed: 21401979
Alcohol Alcohol. 2011 Nov-Dec;46(6):702-8
pubmed: 21727097
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Apr;4(4):e181-e188
pubmed: 30954143
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 31;12:723
pubmed: 22938046
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2018 Nov 02;11:209-220
pubmed: 30464661
Eur J Epidemiol. 2012 Jan;27(1):15-25
pubmed: 22089423
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 08;6(2):e010155
pubmed: 26857106
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Nov;25(16):1725-1734
pubmed: 29635927
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 19;3(8):e003320
pubmed: 23959757
Eur Heart J. 2003 Jun;24(11):987-1003
pubmed: 12788299
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(10):e2759
pubmed: 26962773
Wellcome Open Res. 2018 Jun 4;3:67
pubmed: 30123849
Lancet. 2018 Sep 29;392(10153):1138-1146
pubmed: 30173906
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Oct;7(10):e1332-e1345
pubmed: 31488387
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Jul;57(7):538-41
pubmed: 12821705

Auteurs

Jakob Petersen (J)

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK j.petersen@ucl.ac.uk.
UCL, London, UK.

Anna Kontsevaya (A)

National Research Centre for Preventive Medicine, Moskva, Russian Federation.

Martin McKee (M)

Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Erica Richardson (E)

ECOHOST, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Sarah Cook (S)

Department of Community Medicine, UiT Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.

Sofia Malyutina (S)

Institute of Internal Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
Novosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.

Alexander V Kudryavtsev (AV)

Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation.

David A Leon (DA)

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH