Astigmatic Outcomes of Single, Non-Paired Intrastromal Limbal Relaxing Incisions During Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery Based on a Custom Nomogram.
astigmatic keratotomy
astigmatism
refractive laser-assisted cataract surgery
Journal
Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
ISSN: 1177-5467
Titre abrégé: Clin Ophthalmol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101321512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
10
11
2019
accepted:
25
03
2020
entrez:
6
5
2020
pubmed:
6
5
2020
medline:
6
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To determine astigmatic changes of intrastromal limbal-relaxing incisions (LRIs) performed during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS). Retrospective case series. Patients undergoing FLACS with adjunctive astigmatism management with intrastromal LRIs were included. All eyes had preoperative corneal cylinder (Kcyl) ≥0.20 D on ocular biometry. An intrastromal LRI nomogram of single, non-paired LRIs placed at the 9 mm optical zone was used. Keratometry was measured preoperatively, and postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months (POM3). Alpins astigmatism analysis was used to calculate target-induced astigmatism (TIA, equivalent to preoperative Kcyl), surgically induced astigmatism (SIA), difference vectors (DV), and correction indices (CI). Secondary analysis included multivariable binary logistic regression to determine clinical factors associated with corrections >125% (CI > 1.25). A total of 154 eyes (125 patients) were studied. Mean preoperative Kcyl was 0.87±0.42 D (SD), which did not significantly differ from POM3 Kcyl (0.87±0.51 D, p=0.470). Only the against-the-rule (ATR) subgroup demonstrated a small but significant reduction in Kcyl from preoperative (0.96±0.51D) to POM3 (0.89±0.55D, p=0.032). Sixteen eyes (10.4%) had Kcyl ≤0.5 D preoperatively, compared to 46 eyes (29.9%) at POM3 (p<0.0001). Mean SIA was 0.80±0.52 D. Mean DV was 0.85±0.47. Mean CI was 0.79. Fifty-one eyes (33%) had astigmatism correction >125%. On multivariable regression analysis, ATR astigmatism class (p=0.026) and lower arc lengths (30º) (p=0.005) were associated with correction >125%. Lower preoperative corneal astigmatism was inversely correlated with CI (p<0.001). Although intrastromal LRIs can be conveniently performed during FLACS and appear safe, only patients with ATR astigmatism demonstrated a significant reduction in corneal astigmatism 3-months postoperatively under the current nomogram. Areas for future refinements to the nomogram were identified.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32368004
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S238016
pii: 238016
pmc: PMC7183774
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1059-1070Informations de copyright
© 2020 Lim et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Dr Sohel Somani works as a consultant for Bayer and Novartis, outside the submitted work. We confirm that there are no other known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property.
Références
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;27(4):277-84
pubmed: 27035074
Acta Ophthalmol. 2009 Jun;87(4):386-91
pubmed: 18778337
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Dec;45(12):1762-1769
pubmed: 31856987
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Nov;38(11):1970-7
pubmed: 23079313
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Feb;42(2):251-7
pubmed: 27026450
J Refract Surg. 2014 Jan;30(1):27-33
pubmed: 24864325
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;147(5):779-87, 787.e1
pubmed: 19232560
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Sep;36(9):1479-85
pubmed: 20692558
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Oct;40(10):1676-81
pubmed: 25155388
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Dec;31(12):2261-5
pubmed: 16473215
Source Code Biol Med. 2008 Dec 16;3:17
pubmed: 19087314
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Jul;19(4):524-33
pubmed: 8355160
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jul;43(7):952-955
pubmed: 28823443
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997 Dec;23(10):1503-14
pubmed: 9456408
J Refract Surg. 2013 Mar;29(3):180-6
pubmed: 23446014
Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul-Dec;1(2):90-4
pubmed: 21140999
J Refract Surg. 2016 Mar;32(3):156-62
pubmed: 27027622
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Jan;27(1):31-49
pubmed: 11165856
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Aug;36(8):1323-9
pubmed: 20656155
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 13;11:1841-1848
pubmed: 29075096
J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:540760
pubmed: 25400939
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;24(2):78-82
pubmed: 20379456
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Oct;34(10):1631-6
pubmed: 18812110
J Refract Surg. 2013 Jan;29(1):19-24
pubmed: 23311738
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Sep;32(9):1408; author reply 1408
pubmed: 16931238
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;41(9):825-34
pubmed: 23601493
Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 Mar;113(3):277-82
pubmed: 7887839
Surv Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan-Feb;49(1):109-22
pubmed: 14711444
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug 31;9:1581-7
pubmed: 26357459
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Aug;44(8):955-963
pubmed: 30033111
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 17;10(11):e0143110
pubmed: 26575265
J Refract Surg. 2013 Feb;29(2):114-20
pubmed: 23380412
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;160(2):250-255.e2
pubmed: 25982969
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989 Jan;15(1):13-8
pubmed: 2921730
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Jan;42(1):102-9
pubmed: 26948784
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):255
pubmed: 30241474