Evaluation of the Paper and Smartphone Versions of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR16) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in Depressed Patients in China.
depressive disorder
equivalence
intraclass correlation coefficient
questionnaires
smartphone
Journal
Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment
ISSN: 1176-6328
Titre abrégé: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101240304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
10
12
2019
accepted:
24
03
2020
entrez:
6
5
2020
pubmed:
6
5
2020
medline:
6
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Smartphone-based questionnaires have advantages compared with their paper versions, but there is a lack of consistent research on depressive disorder questionnaires. This study aimed to assess the equivalence between the paper and smartphone versions of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (QIDS-SR16) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for patients with depressive disorders in psychiatric hospitals in China. This was a randomized crossover study of 110 depressed patients recruited from the outpatient department of Beijing Anding Hospital from March 2016 to September 2018. Group 1 completed both the QIDS-SR16 and PHQ-9 in paper format and then completed the smartphone version 1-2 h later. Group 2 completed the scales in the reverse order. Reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The expected ICC was 0.9 (α=0.05). The overall ICC score of the QIDS-SR16 paper and smartphone versions was 0.904 (95% CI: 0.861-0.934), and the ICCs of each item ranged from 0.769 to 0.923. The overall ICC score of the PHQ-9 paper and smartphone versions was 0.951 (95% CI: 0.929-0.967), and the ICCs of each item ranged from 0.779 to 0.914. This study demonstrated the equivalence of the paper and smartphone versions of the PHQ-9 and QIDS-SR16 in depressed patients in China.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32368061
doi: 10.2147/NDT.S241766
pii: 241766
pmc: PMC7173799
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
993-1001Informations de copyright
© 2020 Zhen et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Nov;177(5):1306-1315
pubmed: 28112800
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1757-1767
pubmed: 29663258
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;5(4):249-58
pubmed: 24123813
J Affect Disord. 2014 Jan;152-154:530-3
pubmed: 24144585
Eur Thyroid J. 2016 Mar;5(1):65-72
pubmed: 27099841
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Nov;29(11):2136-9
pubmed: 25123605
Braz J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 17;41(5):369-372
pubmed: 31269098
Psychol Med. 2018 Feb;48(3):473-487
pubmed: 28714421
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Sep 15;2:16065
pubmed: 27629598
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(6):321-326
pubmed: 30269137
JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1737-44
pubmed: 10568646
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2163-96
pubmed: 23245607
PLoS Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):e1001547
pubmed: 24223526
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2011 Jul;38(3):414-23
pubmed: 21107916
Qual Life Res. 2015 Aug;24(8):1949-61
pubmed: 25702266
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29
pubmed: 19900250
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2017 Jul 18;8:83-95
pubmed: 28790875
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 07;13:167
pubmed: 26446159
Ceska Slov Farm. 2017 Spring;66(2):55-61
pubmed: 28914061
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70 Suppl 6:26-31
pubmed: 19922741
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 30;94:109641
pubmed: 31059722
J Affect Disord. 2013 May;147(1-3):421-4
pubmed: 22995944
Psychiatry Investig. 2019 Apr;16(4):300-305
pubmed: 31042692
Internet Interv. 2016 Jun 27;5:1-4
pubmed: 30135800
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Sep 30;243:92-6
pubmed: 27376668
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
J Rheumatol. 2011 Dec;38(12):2619-24
pubmed: 22045844
Value Health. 2018 Jan;21(1):41-48
pubmed: 29304939