Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation.
Clinical trials
Imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Patient participation
Positron emission tomography with computerised tomography (PET/CT)
Journal
Research involvement and engagement
ISSN: 2056-7529
Titre abrégé: Res Involv Engagem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101708164
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
25
06
2019
accepted:
16
04
2020
entrez:
6
5
2020
pubmed:
6
5
2020
medline:
6
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cancer trials often incorporate intensive imaging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography with Computerised Tomography (PET/CT), which can be physically and mentally exhausting for patients. This questionnaire study aimed to determine the aspects of imaging that affect a patient's decision to participate in clinical trials in order to inform the design of future trials that utilise imaging. This should achieve greater patient compliance and improve the patient experience. A detailed questionnaire assessing patient expectation and acceptability of imaging within clinical trials was developed in collaboration with two patient representatives. The questionnaire addressed the influence of scan type, length, frequency, scheduling, invasiveness and staff support on acceptability of imaging. It was applied to three patient groups. Group 1 consisted of patients newly recruited to studies with imaging, Group 2 consisted of previous participants in studies with imaging and Group 3 consisted of patients having imaging for clinical care. One hundred ninety six patients completed the questionnaires (Group 1:47; Group 2: 50 and Group 3: 99). The use of ionising radiation and number of scans required were identified as negative influences on decision to participate by 25% of Group 3 but only by 6% of Groups 1 and 2. Scan duration >30mins was perceived as a negative factor for decision to participate by all Groups (12-22%). Good communication provided by researchers in terms of discussing the study before and after reading study materials was a key factor in influencing decision to participate (> 50% in Groups 1 and 2 and > 20% in Group 3). Factors relating to imaging procedures within clinical trials that affect participation have been identified with communication around study materials as the key determinant. These data will be used to influence the development of future research protocols. Modification of imaging requirements within clinical trials will improve patient tolerance and acceptability and is likely to raise recruitment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cancer trials often incorporate intensive imaging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography with Computerised Tomography (PET/CT), which can be physically and mentally exhausting for patients. This questionnaire study aimed to determine the aspects of imaging that affect a patient's decision to participate in clinical trials in order to inform the design of future trials that utilise imaging. This should achieve greater patient compliance and improve the patient experience.
METHOD
METHODS
A detailed questionnaire assessing patient expectation and acceptability of imaging within clinical trials was developed in collaboration with two patient representatives. The questionnaire addressed the influence of scan type, length, frequency, scheduling, invasiveness and staff support on acceptability of imaging. It was applied to three patient groups. Group 1 consisted of patients newly recruited to studies with imaging, Group 2 consisted of previous participants in studies with imaging and Group 3 consisted of patients having imaging for clinical care.
RESULTS
RESULTS
One hundred ninety six patients completed the questionnaires (Group 1:47; Group 2: 50 and Group 3: 99). The use of ionising radiation and number of scans required were identified as negative influences on decision to participate by 25% of Group 3 but only by 6% of Groups 1 and 2. Scan duration >30mins was perceived as a negative factor for decision to participate by all Groups (12-22%). Good communication provided by researchers in terms of discussing the study before and after reading study materials was a key factor in influencing decision to participate (> 50% in Groups 1 and 2 and > 20% in Group 3).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Factors relating to imaging procedures within clinical trials that affect participation have been identified with communication around study materials as the key determinant. These data will be used to influence the development of future research protocols. Modification of imaging requirements within clinical trials will improve patient tolerance and acceptability and is likely to raise recruitment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32368349
doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00195-5
pii: 195
pmc: PMC7189543
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
15Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsNone of the authors have competing interests to declare.
Références
Radiology. 2015 May;275(2):545-52
pubmed: 25803490
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68
pubmed: 25113753
Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):178-211
pubmed: 28655541
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:318-324
pubmed: 27422453
Nucl Med Commun. 2020 Mar 13;:
pubmed: 32187158
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1465-1475
pubmed: 29043428
Eur J Cancer. 2006 May;42(8):1031-9
pubmed: 16616487
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Aug;58(8):713-25
pubmed: 26163950