Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Microsatellite Instability-High End-Stage Cancers and Poor Performance Status Related to High Disease Burden.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Lazarus response
Microsatellite instability
Mismatch repair deficiency
Performance status
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
07
01
2020
accepted:
30
03
2020
pubmed:
6
5
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
6
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Few real-world series on the efficacy and safety of anti-programmed cell death protein-1(PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1(PD-L1)-based therapy are available in molecularly unselected patients with poor performance status (PS) and specific types of advanced cancers, because such populations are typically excluded from clinical trials due to poor life expectancy and risk of toxicity. This multicenter retrospective case series included patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high metastatic cancers with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS of 2 or 3 not related to comorbidities receiving anti-PD-1 with or without anti-CTLA-4 therapy after failure of at least one prior treatment line. We included 27 patients with six diverse tumor types: colorectal (n = 18), gastric (n = 5), biliary tract, pancreatic, small bowel, and endometrial cancers (n = 1 each). Baseline ECOG PS was 2 (74%) or 3 (26%). Overall response rate was 33%, with six partial and three complete responses. Median time to response was 3.1, months and median duration of response was 16.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.3 to not evaluable), and 18-month overall survival was 50.8% (95% confidence interval, 32.7-78.8). Baseline variables were not associated with survival outcomes. ECOG PS 1 was reached by 52% of patients in a median time of 6 weeks, and ECOG PS 0 was reached by 30% of patients in a median time of 10 weeks. In a high proportion of patients with MSI-high cancers and poor performance status related to end-stage disease, salvage immunotherapy can induce potentially long-lasting "Lazarus responses". Immunotherapy decisions near the end-of-life should be carefully integrated with predictive biomarkers and with palliative care measures in the real-world setting. In this retrospective cohort study of 27 pretreated patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high cancers and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or 3 not related to comorbidities, PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy induced a RECIST response in 33% of patients, with a median duration of 16.9 months, and an improvement of performance status in 52% of patients. MSI-high status can be used in clinical practice as a tumor-agnostic predictive biomarker to select critically ill patients with end-stage cancers for salvage immunotherapy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Few real-world series on the efficacy and safety of anti-programmed cell death protein-1(PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1(PD-L1)-based therapy are available in molecularly unselected patients with poor performance status (PS) and specific types of advanced cancers, because such populations are typically excluded from clinical trials due to poor life expectancy and risk of toxicity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This multicenter retrospective case series included patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high metastatic cancers with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS of 2 or 3 not related to comorbidities receiving anti-PD-1 with or without anti-CTLA-4 therapy after failure of at least one prior treatment line.
RESULTS
We included 27 patients with six diverse tumor types: colorectal (n = 18), gastric (n = 5), biliary tract, pancreatic, small bowel, and endometrial cancers (n = 1 each). Baseline ECOG PS was 2 (74%) or 3 (26%). Overall response rate was 33%, with six partial and three complete responses. Median time to response was 3.1, months and median duration of response was 16.9 months. Median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI: 2.3 to not evaluable), and 18-month overall survival was 50.8% (95% confidence interval, 32.7-78.8). Baseline variables were not associated with survival outcomes. ECOG PS 1 was reached by 52% of patients in a median time of 6 weeks, and ECOG PS 0 was reached by 30% of patients in a median time of 10 weeks.
CONCLUSION
In a high proportion of patients with MSI-high cancers and poor performance status related to end-stage disease, salvage immunotherapy can induce potentially long-lasting "Lazarus responses". Immunotherapy decisions near the end-of-life should be carefully integrated with predictive biomarkers and with palliative care measures in the real-world setting.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
In this retrospective cohort study of 27 pretreated patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high cancers and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or 3 not related to comorbidities, PD-1/PD-L1-based therapy induced a RECIST response in 33% of patients, with a median duration of 16.9 months, and an improvement of performance status in 52% of patients. MSI-high status can be used in clinical practice as a tumor-agnostic predictive biomarker to select critically ill patients with end-stage cancers for salvage immunotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32369650
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0014
pmc: PMC7485362
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
803-809Informations de copyright
© AlphaMed Press 2020.
Références
Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1096-1103
pubmed: 31038663
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1863-1867
pubmed: 30995172
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 21;377(25):2500-2501
pubmed: 29262275
Cancer Discov. 2018 Jan;8(1):49-58
pubmed: 29122777
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):67-76
pubmed: 27939400
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1182-1191
pubmed: 28734759
Nat Med. 2018 Sep;24(9):1449-1458
pubmed: 30013197
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;38(1):11-19
pubmed: 31725351
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;38(1):1-10
pubmed: 31682550
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3807-3814
pubmed: 28841387
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):773-779
pubmed: 29355075
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 20;27(9):1350-4
pubmed: 19224840
JAMA Oncol. 2018 May 10;4(5):e180013
pubmed: 29543932
Lancet. 2018 Jul 14;392(10142):123-133
pubmed: 29880231
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Sep;17(3):e489-e498
pubmed: 29650416
Science. 2017 Jul 28;357(6349):409-413
pubmed: 28596308