How Are Information and Communication Technologies Supporting Routine Outcome Monitoring and Measurement-Based Care in Psychotherapy? A Systematic Review.
information and communication technologies
measurement-based care
mental health
outcome monitoring
therapist feedback
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 05 2020
02 05 2020
Historique:
received:
06
04
2020
revised:
27
04
2020
accepted:
29
04
2020
entrez:
7
5
2020
pubmed:
7
5
2020
medline:
6
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Psychotherapy has proven to be effective for a wide range of mental health problems. However, not all patients respond to the treatment as expected (not-on-track patients). Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and measurement-based care (MBC), which consist of monitoring patients between appointments and using this data to guide the intervention, have been shown to be particularly useful for these not-on-track patients. Traditionally, though, ROM and MBC have been challenging, due to the difficulties associated with repeated monitoring of patients and providing real-time feedback to therapists. The use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) might help reduce these challenges. Therefore, we systematically reviewed evidence regarding the use of ICTs for ROM and MBC in face-to-face psychological interventions for mental health problems. The search included published and unpublished studies indexed in the electronic databases PubMed, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS. Main search terms were variations of the terms "psychological treatment", "progress monitoring or measurement-based care", and "technology". Eighteen studies met eligibility criteria. In these, ICTs were frequently handheld technologies, such as smartphone apps, tablets, or laptops, which were involved in the whole process (assessment and feedback). Overall, the use of technology for ROM and MBC during psychological interventions was feasible and acceptable. In addition, the use of ICTs was found to be effective, particularly for not-on-track patients, which is consistent with similar non-ICT research. Given the heterogeneity of reviewed studies, more research and replication is needed to obtain robust findings with different technological solutions and to facilitate the generalization of findings to different mental health populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32370140
pii: ijerph17093170
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093170
pmc: PMC7246636
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest
Références
Psychother Res. 2017 Sep;27(5):525-538
pubmed: 27013204
Depress Anxiety. 2017 Jun;34(6):494-501
pubmed: 28453916
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Jun;78(3):298-311
pubmed: 20515206
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Apr 13;13(4):420
pubmed: 27089352
JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Jul 20;5(3):e20
pubmed: 28729233
Trials. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):145
pubmed: 29482614
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 08;19(5):e148
pubmed: 28483742
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Dec;62(12):1423-9
pubmed: 22193788
FASEB J. 2008 Feb;22(2):338-42
pubmed: 17884971
J Affect Disord. 2010 Dec;127(1-3):139-46
pubmed: 20542574
Emotion. 2020 Feb;20(1):30-36
pubmed: 31961174
J Ment Health. 2012 Aug;21(4):355-63
pubmed: 22548363
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;5(7):564-572
pubmed: 29937396
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Mar;74:71-79
pubmed: 28132704
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Oct 18;54(4):1561-1591
pubmed: 27636843
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2018 Nov 1;15(11-12):13-26
pubmed: 30834167
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Oct;110(2):241-57
pubmed: 21112595
Bipolar Disord. 2012 Mar;14(2):185-97
pubmed: 22420594
Schizophr Res. 2020 Feb;216:479-487
pubmed: 31812327
Telemed J E Health. 2014 May;20(5):419-27
pubmed: 24579913
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;69(2):159-72
pubmed: 11393594
J Couns Psychol. 2017 Jul;64(4):385-393
pubmed: 28318277
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;61(1):34-40
pubmed: 18083460
Cogn Behav Pract. 2015 Feb;22(1):49-59
pubmed: 27330267
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):15-22
pubmed: 19567889
Health Informatics J. 2012 Dec;18(4):294-308
pubmed: 23257059
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Feb;61(2):165-74
pubmed: 15609358
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 May;43(3):325-43
pubmed: 26744316
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2009 Dec;46(4):418-31
pubmed: 22121836
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Aug 28;20(10):81
pubmed: 30155749
Psychother Res. 2015;25(6):669-77
pubmed: 25101527
Internet Interv. 2018 Nov 18;14:18-25
pubmed: 30510910
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2018 Fall;16(4):370-375
pubmed: 31191181
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Jan;96:239-246
pubmed: 29126059
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 13;7:CD011119
pubmed: 27409972
Front Psychol. 2016 May 03;7:604
pubmed: 27199837
Psychother Res. 2014;24(6):629-39
pubmed: 24386975
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2018 Mar - Apr;51:22-29
pubmed: 29272712
Med Care. 2010 Jun;48(6 Suppl):S9-16
pubmed: 20473205
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Feb 27;5(1):e15
pubmed: 29487044
Clin J Pain. 2018 Oct;34(10):900-908
pubmed: 29659375
Clin Obes. 2018 Dec;8(6):452-464
pubmed: 30208266
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;18(1):104-10
pubmed: 20846319
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Dec;99:89-97
pubmed: 29024821
Psychother Res. 2001 Mar;11(1):49-68
pubmed: 25849877
Psychother Res. 2015;25(6):633-46
pubmed: 26436605