Paclitaxel and Mortality Following Peripheral Angioplasty: An Adjusted and Case Matched Multicentre Analysis.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angioplasty, Balloon
/ adverse effects
Cardiovascular Agents
/ administration & dosage
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Databases, Factual
Drug-Eluting Stents
England
Female
Femoral Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Greece
Humans
Intermittent Claudication
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Paclitaxel
/ administration & dosage
Peripheral Arterial Disease
/ diagnostic imaging
Popliteal Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Prosthesis Design
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Angioplasty
Paclitaxel
Peripheral arterial disease
Journal
European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
ISSN: 1532-2165
Titre abrégé: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9512728
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
10
12
2019
revised:
16
03
2020
accepted:
07
04
2020
pubmed:
7
5
2020
medline:
22
9
2020
entrez:
7
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Paclitaxel based drug coated balloons (DCBs) and drug eluting stents (DESs) may be associated with increased mortality in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), based on a recent meta-analysis. This study, however, had a number of limitations, which have been discussed at great length among the vascular community. The aim of this research was to assess the association between paclitaxel based endovascular treatment (PTX) in the femoropopliteal (F-P) segment and mortality, adjusting for relevant risk factors and including patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI). This was a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained multicentre (three sites) database of patients with claudication or CLTI. Patients having F-P angioplasty between 1 January 2014 and 30 May 2019 with or without PTX were included. Survival was compared in Cox regression analyses adjusted for parameters of the Charlson comorbidity index. A separate nested case matched (based on each individual's Charlson index) analysis was performed to compare mortality rates between those who received PTX and those who did not. A total of 2 071 patients were analysed: 966 patients (46.6%) were treated with PTX (952 [46%] had CLTI and 1 119 [54%] severe claudication [Rutherford stage 3]). Over a 24 month median follow up, 456 (22.1%) patients died. Using multivariable Cox regression, PTX was not associated with mortality (HR 0.94, p = .46), even when assessed separately for those with intermittent claudication (HR 1.30, p = .15) or CLTI (HR 0.81, p = .060). In the case matched analysis (885 matched pairs of patients), PTX was not associated with mortality (HR 0.89, p = .17). Paclitaxel dose and use of a DCB or DES were not associated with mortality in any subanalysis. When relevant risk factors were taken into account, there were no associations between PTX and mid term mortality in patients with PAOD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32370918
pii: S1078-5884(20)30330-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.04.008
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cardiovascular Agents
0
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
0
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
220-229Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR300059
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.