ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Head Trauma-Child.
AUC
Appropriate Use Criteria
Appropriateness Criteria
CT
Head trauma
MRI
Pediatric
Journal
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
ISSN: 1558-349X
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101190326
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
15
01
2020
accepted:
22
01
2020
entrez:
7
5
2020
pubmed:
7
5
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Head trauma is a frequent indication for cranial imaging in children. The majority of accidental pediatric head trauma is minor and sustained without intracranial injury. Well-validated pediatric-specific clinical decision guidelines should be used to identify very low-risk children who can safely forgo imaging. In those who require acute imaging, CT is considered the first-line imaging modality for suspected intracranial injury because of the short duration of the examination and its high sensitivity for acute hemorrhage. MRI can accurately detect traumatic complications, but often necessitates sedation in children, owing to the examination length and motion sensitivity, which limits rapid assessment. There is a paucity of literature regarding vascular injuries in pediatric blunt head trauma and imaging is typically guided by clinical suspicion. Advanced imaging techniques have the potential to identify changes that are not seen by standard imaging, but data are currently insufficient to support routine clinical use. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32370957
pii: S1546-1440(20)30114-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.026
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Practice Guideline
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S125-S137Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.