Impact of
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Algorithms
Breast
/ diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Cohort Studies
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Middle Aged
Multimodal Imaging
/ methods
Neoplasm Staging
Positron-Emission Tomography
/ methods
Prospective Studies
Radiopharmaceuticals
Risk
Breast cancer
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
TNM staging
positron emission tomography
Journal
European journal of radiology
ISSN: 1872-7727
Titre abrégé: Eur J Radiol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8106411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2020
Jul 2020
Historique:
received:
18
11
2019
revised:
27
02
2020
accepted:
23
03
2020
pubmed:
7
5
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
entrez:
7
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate whether potential differences in staging between a traditional staging imaging algorithm and In this prospective cohort study from two university hospitals 56 women with newly diagnosed, therapy-naive breast cancer and increased pre-test probability for distant metastases were included. All patients were examined by a traditional staging imaging algorithm (X-ray mammography, breast ultrasonography, chest plain radiography, bone scintigraphy, and ultrasonography of the liver and axillary fossa) and whole-body Staging by In conclusion, for breast cancer patients with elevated pre-test probability for distant metastases a change of the therapy regiment occurs in 14 % of patients when staged by
Identifiants
pubmed: 32371185
pii: S0720-048X(20)30164-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108975
pmc: PMC9587896
mid: NIHMS1704933
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Radiopharmaceuticals
0
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
0Z5B2CJX4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108975Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018 Nov;78(11):1056-1088
pubmed: 30581198
Ann Oncol. 2012 Sep;23(9):2277-2282
pubmed: 22357250
Radiology. 2017 May;283(2):361-370
pubmed: 28221097
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Dec;83(12):2231-2239
pubmed: 25282709
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Aug;50(2):377-390
pubmed: 30659696
Breast. 2014 Oct;23(5):489-502
pubmed: 25244983
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jul 8;67(4):290-303
pubmed: 28294295
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4
pubmed: 20180029
Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;29(8):1634-1657
pubmed: 30032243
Invest Radiol. 2014 Jun;49(6):421-30
pubmed: 24566292
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;34(16):1889-97
pubmed: 27001573
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Feb;45(2):179-186
pubmed: 28905091
Radiology. 2013 Feb;266(2):388-405
pubmed: 23220901
Acta Oncol. 2014 Jan;53(1):50-7
pubmed: 23672678
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v8-30
pubmed: 26314782
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;38(1):31-7
pubmed: 21937190
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013 Jun;73(6):556-583
pubmed: 24771925
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 1;19(3):628-33
pubmed: 11157012
Invest Radiol. 2009 Jul;44(7):412-21
pubmed: 19448554
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 May;39(5):852-63
pubmed: 22392069
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1787-1798
pubmed: 30267154
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2015;36(6):672-6
pubmed: 26775349
Cancer Imaging. 2014 Apr 22;14:13
pubmed: 25608599
Ann Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;28(12):3111
pubmed: 28327998
Lancet. 2011 Oct 22;378(9801):1461-84
pubmed: 21924486
Cancer. 2009 Nov 1;115(21):5095-107
pubmed: 19670458
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 1;26(19):3248-58
pubmed: 18474876
Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 13;9(14):11816-11823
pubmed: 29545938
Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):505-13
pubmed: 26115367
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Dec;45(13):2328-2337
pubmed: 30056547
Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun;22(2):139-43
pubmed: 23566435