Central reader evaluation of MRI scans of the sacroiliac joints from the ASAS classification cohort: discrepancies with local readers and impact on the performance of the ASAS criteria.
Adult
Cohort Studies
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Humans
International Agencies
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ classification
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Rheumatology
/ methods
Sacroiliac Joint
/ diagnostic imaging
Sacroiliitis
/ classification
Societies, Medical
Spondylarthritis
/ classification
magnetic resonance imaging
outcomes research
spondyloarthritis
Journal
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1468-2060
Titre abrégé: Ann Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
25
02
2020
revised:
19
04
2020
accepted:
21
04
2020
pubmed:
7
5
2020
medline:
10
7
2020
entrez:
7
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) MRI working group conducted a multireader exercise on MRI scans from the ASAS classification cohort to assess the spectrum and evolution of lesions in the sacroiliac joint and impact of discrepancies with local readers on numbers of patients classified as axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Seven readers assessed baseline scans from 278 cases and 8 readers assessed baseline and follow-up scans from 107 cases. Agreement for detection of MRI lesions between central and local readers was assessed descriptively and by the kappa statistic. We calculated the number of patients classified as axSpA by the ASAS criteria after replacing local detection of active lesions by central readers and replacing local reader radiographic sacroiliitis by central reader structural lesions on MRI. Structural lesions, especially erosions, were as frequent as active lesions (≈40%), the majority of patients having both types of lesions. The ASAS definitions for active MRI lesion typical of axSpA and erosion were comparatively discriminatory between axSpA and non-axSpA. Local reader overcall for active MRI lesions was about 30% but this had a minor impact on the number of patients (6.4%) classified as axSpA. Substitution of radiography with MRI structural lesions also had little impact on classification status (1.4%). Despite substantial discrepancy between central and local readers in interpretation of both types of MRI lesion, this had a minor impact on the numbers of patients classified as axSpA supporting the robustness of the ASAS criteria for differences in assessment of imaging.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32371388
pii: annrheumdis-2020-217232
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217232
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
935-942Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.