When phonological neighborhood density both facilitates and impedes: Age of acquisition and name agreement interact with phonological neighborhood during word production.
Age of acquisition
Frequency
Language production
Name agreement
Phonological Neighborhood Density
Journal
Memory & cognition
ISSN: 1532-5946
Titre abrégé: Mem Cognit
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0357443
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2020
08 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
7
5
2020
medline:
10
8
2021
entrez:
7
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The number of similar-sounding words that a target word has, or its Phonological Neighborhood Density (PND), has been shown to influence word production. However, reported results are sometimes inconsistent, with studies showing facilitation, inhibition, and null effects of phonological neighbors. These mixed results may be due to the influence of other factors beyond PND. We investigated the potential interactions between a broad measure of PND (bPND), and age of acquisition (AoA), frequency, and name agreement in order to see if the effect of bPND varies as a function of these three variables. We examined the effect of bPND on the latency of picture naming and observed significant interactions between bPND and AoA such that bPND facilitated lexical retrieval for words that were acquired early, but inhibited retrieval for words acquired later in life. We hypothesize that lexical retrieval difficulty ultimately depends on the activation level of the target word's phonological representations relative to the activation levels of its neighbors' phonological representations. When phonological features of the target word are weakly activated (i.e., late AoA), and bPND is high, the neighbors' activation may overshadow the target's, impeding target retrieval. However, when the target's phonological representation is strongly activated, the activation of the neighbors might not exceed that of the target, thereby supporting phonological retrieval. We also observed interactions between bPND and name agreement such that increasing bPND led to faster reaction times (RTs), particularly when name agreement was lower, suggesting that bPND may also facilitate word retrieval when lexical competition is high.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32372366
doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01042-4
pii: 10.3758/s13421-020-01042-4
pmc: PMC7787263
mid: NIHMS1591396
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1061-1072Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG034138
Pays : United States
Références
J Vis. 2007 Aug 16;7(2):17.1-22
pubmed: 18217832
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 18;8:2368
pubmed: 29403412
Mem Cognit. 1987 May;15(3):208-16
pubmed: 3600260
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 23;6:471
pubmed: 25954228
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Apr;47(2):421-36
pubmed: 15157141
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jun;31(4):491-504
pubmed: 12872866
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Feb;48(1):108-24
pubmed: 15938063
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Dec;58:86-93
pubmed: 30180994
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2010 Sep;65(5):551-60
pubmed: 20542997
J Mem Lang. 2010 Feb 1;62(2):113-134
pubmed: 20161591
Lang Speech. 2002 Dec;45(Pt 4):407-34
pubmed: 12866911
Lang Speech. 1997 Jul-Sep;40 ( Pt 3):211-28
pubmed: 9509578
J Exp Psychol. 1957 Apr;53(4):221-7
pubmed: 13416488
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 22;9(12):e114572
pubmed: 25531411
Lang Cogn Process. 2006;21(6):760-770
pubmed: 18802492
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(5):639-645
pubmed: 27493979
Lang Speech. 1997 Jan-Mar;40 ( Pt 1):47-62
pubmed: 9230698
Mem Cognit. 2015 Oct;43(7):1085-103
pubmed: 25956729
Lang Cogn Process. 2009 May 1;24(4):527-554
pubmed: 19946622
Percept Psychophys. 1989 Mar;45(3):189-95
pubmed: 2710616
Brain Lang. 2002 Aug;82(2):113-45
pubmed: 12096871
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Feb;68:33-58
pubmed: 24291531
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):514-29
pubmed: 14979821
Lang Speech. 2005;48(Pt 2):123-56
pubmed: 16411502
Psychol Rev. 1986 Jul;93(3):283-321
pubmed: 3749399
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174-215
pubmed: 7373248
Mem Cognit. 1989 Mar;17(2):163-74
pubmed: 2927314
PLoS One. 2010 May 24;5(5):e10773
pubmed: 20532245
Q J Exp Psychol. 1965 Nov;17(4):273-81
pubmed: 5852918
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):603-9
pubmed: 14620353
Ear Hear. 1998 Feb;19(1):1-36
pubmed: 9504270
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):82-96
pubmed: 29683706
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010 Jul;27(5):401-27
pubmed: 21718214
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jul;36(4):892-905
pubmed: 20565208
Brain Lang. 2014 Aug;135:20-31
pubmed: 24887390
Mem Cognit. 1992 Nov;20(6):705-14
pubmed: 1435273
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 11;9(9):e106953
pubmed: 25211489
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):65-79
pubmed: 18194055
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Sep;26(5):1103-23
pubmed: 11009247
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2004 Jan;115(1):43-67
pubmed: 14734241
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):735-47
pubmed: 12109765
Cognition. 2005 Jun;96(2):B45-54
pubmed: 15925568
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jan;60(1):32-42
pubmed: 17162506
Lang Cogn Process. 2014 Jan 1;29(3):326-344
pubmed: 24563568
J Mem Lang. 1989 Oct 1;28(5):501-518
pubmed: 24465086
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Dec;44(6):1321-37
pubmed: 11776368
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37527
pubmed: 22662166
Psychol Rev. 2012 Apr;119(2):417-30
pubmed: 22352357
Lang Speech. 2002 Sep;45(Pt 3):285-317
pubmed: 12693688
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 02;7:813
pubmed: 27458393
Percept Psychophys. 2000 Apr;62(3):615-25
pubmed: 10909252
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Feb;36(1):140-55
pubmed: 15190709
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):413-22
pubmed: 15172557
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Nov;26(6):1378-91
pubmed: 11185771
Cortex. 1995 Dec;31(4):637-52
pubmed: 8750023