On Variant Discovery in Genomes of Fungal Plant Pathogens.
fungal pathogens
genome alignment
genome assembly
next-generation sequencing
population genomics
variant calling
Journal
Frontiers in microbiology
ISSN: 1664-302X
Titre abrégé: Front Microbiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
01
10
2019
accepted:
19
03
2020
entrez:
7
5
2020
pubmed:
7
5
2020
medline:
7
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Comparative genome analyses of eukaryotic pathogens including fungi and oomycetes have revealed extensive variability in genome composition and structure. The genomes of individuals from the same population can exhibit different numbers of chromosomes and different organization of chromosomal segments, defining so-called accessory compartments that have been shown to be crucial to pathogenicity in plant-infecting fungi. This high level of structural variation confers a methodological challenge for population genomic analyses. Variant discovery from population sequencing data is typically achieved using established pipelines based on the mapping of short reads to a reference genome. These pipelines have been developed, and extensively used, for eukaryote genomes of both plants and animals, to retrieve single nucleotide polymorphisms and short insertions and deletions. However, they do not permit the inference of large-scale genomic structural variation, as this task typically requires the alignment of complete genome sequences. Here, we compare traditional variant discovery approaches to a pipeline based on
Identifiants
pubmed: 32373089
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00626
pmc: PMC7176817
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
626Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Potgieter, Feurtey, Dutheil and Stukenbrock.
Références
Brief Bioinform. 2018 Sep 28;19(5):893-904
pubmed: 28407084
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017 Dec;15(12):756-771
pubmed: 28781365
PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(4):e1002608
pubmed: 22570606
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(12):e1003345
pubmed: 24348224
Brief Bioinform. 2010 Mar;11(2):181-97
pubmed: 19864250
Nat Genet. 2014 Aug;46(8):912-918
pubmed: 25017105
PLoS Genet. 2016 Nov 17;12(11):e1006401
pubmed: 27855160
Genome Biol. 2014 Jun 26;15(6):R84
pubmed: 24970577
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 8;7(1):10963
pubmed: 28887485
Genome Biol. 2019 Nov 20;20(1):246
pubmed: 31747936
Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 15;29(8):1072-5
pubmed: 23422339
PLoS Genet. 2009 Aug;5(8):e1000618
pubmed: 19714214
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 May;12(5):363-76
pubmed: 21358748
Nature. 2010 Mar 18;464(7287):367-73
pubmed: 20237561
Bioinformatics. 2016 Oct 1;32(19):3021-3
pubmed: 27318204
Genome Res. 2016 Aug;26(8):1091-100
pubmed: 27325116
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 24;7:43169
pubmed: 28233799
G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Apr 27;5(7):1323-33
pubmed: 25917918
Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256-76
pubmed: 1145509
Bioinformatics. 2012 Sep 15;28(18):i333-i339
pubmed: 22962449
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 07;5:17875
pubmed: 26639839
Nat Methods. 2009 Sep;6(9):677-81
pubmed: 19668202
BMC Bioinformatics. 2018 Nov 19;19(1):429
pubmed: 30453880
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 12;115(24):E5459-E5466
pubmed: 29844193
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 May 08;10(6):417-30
pubmed: 22565130
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 May;37(5):555-560
pubmed: 30858580