Postoperative Functional and Cosmetic Satisfaction among Subjects Undergoing Open Versus Endonasal Septorhinoplasty: Five Years' Experience from an Open-label Study at a Tertiary Care Center in Oman.

Oman Postoperative Period Prospective Studies Rhinoplasty

Journal

Oman medical journal
ISSN: 1999-768X
Titre abrégé: Oman Med J
Pays: Oman
ID NLM: 101526350

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Historique:
received: 31 03 2019
accepted: 12 09 2019
entrez: 7 5 2020
pubmed: 7 5 2020
medline: 7 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We sought to compare functional and cosmetic satisfaction among male and female patients undergoing open and closed septorhinoplasty within sub-groups of indications for the surgery at a tertiary care hospital in Oman. We conducted a prospective study in the ear, nose, and throat surgery department at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital from 2010 to 2015. All patients aged above 17 years, without dysmorphic pathologies, and due to be operated through open or endonasal septorhinoplasty based on the appropriate indications (functional or cosmetic or functional and cosmetic), were included in the study. Out of 215 patients who underwent septorhinoplasty, 30 were lost to follow-up. One-hundred and eighty-five patients (124 males and 61 females) available for postoperative assessment had been allocated to septorhinoplasty by the endonasal approach (n = 89; 59 males and 30 females) or open approach (n = 96; 65 males and 31 females) based on their indications for surgery: functional (n = 98; 64 males and 34 females); cosmetic (n = 39; 23 males and 16 females); and both functional and cosmetic (n = 48; 37 males and 11 females). Sex-wise distribution across different age groups for the specific surgical technique based on indication for surgery did not show any significant differences within any of the respective sub-groups. Both sexes reported no significant difference in satisfaction per their scores on the functional satisfaction scale post open or endonasal intervention. However, in their cosmetic satisfaction scale scores, a significantly higher proportion of males within the functional indication for surgery subgroup (90.9%) expressed satisfaction with the open surgical approach than the 71.0% males operated by the endonasal approach ( Males undergoing septorhinoplasty for functional indications expressed significant satisfaction with the open surgical approach compared with the endonasal approach on the cosmetic satisfaction scale. This study could accrue only 185 patients during the five-year study period and hence was unable to generate any significant evidence to prove any differences in postoperative functional and cosmetic satisfaction outcomes within sub-groups based on other indications for surgery for males and females separately.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32373349
doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.38
pii: OMJ-35-02-1900067
pmc: PMC7186770
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e120

Informations de copyright

The OMJ is Published Bimonthly and Copyrighted 2020 by the OMSB.

Références

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2001 Feb;26(1):50-2
pubmed: 11298168
Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):93-8
pubmed: 23122872
Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Sep 13;39(10):1057-1062
pubmed: 30722008
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2016 Sep 15;4(3):397-403
pubmed: 27703562
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000 Apr;26(4):497-509
pubmed: 10771222
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(11):1133-51
pubmed: 17046622
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Aug;40(4):592-601
pubmed: 27251751
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2016 Apr;4(2):137-47
pubmed: 27218111
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 1;113(4):1229-37
pubmed: 15083026
Body Image. 2016 Sep;18:168-86
pubmed: 27498379
Scand J Psychol. 2019 Feb;60(1):67-76
pubmed: 30395688
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;7(1):32-7
pubmed: 15655172
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1198-206
pubmed: 25654742
East Mediterr Health J. 2001 May;7(3):562-7
pubmed: 12690782
Clin Otolaryngol. 2016 Jun;41(3):259-75
pubmed: 26264703
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;4(2):55-66
pubmed: 21716951
World J Plast Surg. 2012 Jul;1(2):99-106
pubmed: 25734051
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Jul;42(4):355-61
pubmed: 16001915
Laryngoscope. 2007 Jun;117(6):985-9
pubmed: 17460577
Ann Plast Surg. 2000 Jan;44(1):89-96
pubmed: 10651374
Dermatol Surg. 2001 May;27(5):457-62
pubmed: 11359494
Can J Plast Surg. 2011 Fall;19(3):108-10
pubmed: 22942663
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;43(1):102-114
pubmed: 30288564
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Jun;64(6):738-41
pubmed: 21269896
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Mar;63(3):493-8
pubmed: 19117824
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996 Jun;105(6):415-22
pubmed: 8638891

Auteurs

Rashid Al Abri (R)

ENT division, Department of Surgery, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman.

Wameedh Al Bassam (W)

ENT division, Department of Surgery, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman.

Firyal Al-Balushi (F)

ENT division, Department of Surgery, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman.

Omar Hlaiwah (O)

ENT division, Department of Surgery, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman.

Sanjay Jaju (S)

Epidemiology and Biostatistics Section, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

Samir Al-Adawi (S)

Department of Behavioral Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

Classifications MeSH