Structure of the cytoplasmic ring of the Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex by cryo-electron microscopy single particle analysis.


Journal

Cell research
ISSN: 1748-7838
Titre abrégé: Cell Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9425763

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
received: 27 03 2020
accepted: 06 04 2020
pubmed: 8 5 2020
medline: 20 7 2021
entrez: 8 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) exhibits structural plasticity and has only been characterized at local resolutions of up to 15 Å for the cytoplasmic ring (CR). Here we present a single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of the CR from Xenopus laevis NPC at average resolutions of 5.5-7.9 Å, with local resolutions reaching 4.5 Å. Improved resolutions allow identification and placement of secondary structural elements in the majority of the CR components. The two Y complexes in each CR subunit interact with each other and associate with those from flanking subunits, forming a circular scaffold. Within each CR subunit, the Nup358-containing region wraps around the stems of both Y complexes, likely stabilizing the scaffold. Nup205 connects the short arms of the two Y complexes and associates with the stem of a neighboring Y complex. The Nup214-containing region uses an extended coiled-coil to link Nup85 of the two Y complexes and protrudes into the axial pore of the NPC. These previously uncharacterized structural features reveal insights into NPC assembly.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32376910
doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0319-4
pii: 10.1038/s41422-020-0319-4
pmc: PMC7264146
doi:

Substances chimiques

Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

520-531

Références

Hoelz, A., Debler, E. W. & Blobel, G. The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 613–643 (2011).
pubmed: 21495847 doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060109-151030
Grossman, E., Medalia, O. & Zwerger, M. Functional architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 41, 557–584 (2012).
pubmed: 22577827 doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102328
Schwartz, T. U. The structure inventory of the nuclear pore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 1986–2000 (2016).
pubmed: 27016207 pmcid: 4886551 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.015
Beck, M. & Hurt, E. The nuclear pore complex: understanding its function through structural insight. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 73–89 (2017).
pubmed: 27999437 doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.147
Lin, D. H. & Hoelz, A. The structure of the nuclear pore complex (an update). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 88, 725–783 (2019).
pubmed: 30883195 pmcid: 6588426 doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-011901
Fernandez-Martinez, J. & Rout, M. P. A jumbo problem: mapping the structure and functions of the nuclear pore complex. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 92–99 (2012).
pubmed: 22321828 pmcid: 3472030 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2011.12.013
Hinshaw, J. E., Carragher, B. O. & Milligan, R. A. Architecture and design of the nuclear pore complex. Cell 69, 1133–1141 (1992).
pubmed: 1617726 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90635-P
Akey, C. W. & Radermacher, M. Architecture of the Xenopus Nuclear pore complex revealed by 3-dimensional cryoelectron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 122, 1–19 (1993).
pubmed: 8314837 doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.1.1
von Appen, A. & Beck, M. Structure determination of the nuclear pore complex with three-dimensional cryo electron microscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 2001–2010 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.01.004
Beck, M. et al. Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science 306, 1387–1390 (2004).
pubmed: 15514115 doi: 10.1126/science.1104808
Beck, M., Lucic, V., Forster, F., Baumeister, W. & Medalia, O. Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action captured by cryo-electron tomography. Nature 449, 611–615 (2007).
pubmed: 17851530 doi: 10.1038/nature06170
Bui, K. H. et al. Integrated structural analysis of the human nuclear pore complex scaffold. Cell 155, 1233–1243 (2013).
pubmed: 24315095 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.055
von Appen, A. et al. In situ structural analysis of the human nuclear pore complex. Nature 526, 140–143 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nature15381
Eibauer, M. et al. Structure and gating of the nuclear pore complex. Nat. Commun. 6, 7532 (2015).
pubmed: 26112706 pmcid: 4491817 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8532
Kim, S. J. et al. Integrative structure and functional anatomy of a nuclear pore complex. Nature 555, 475–482 (2018).
pubmed: 29539637 pmcid: 6022767 doi: 10.1038/nature26003
Mosalaganti, S. et al. In situ architecture of the algal nuclear pore complex. Nat. Commun. 9, 2361 (2018).
pubmed: 29915221 pmcid: 6006428 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04739-y
Lin, D. H. et al. Architecture of the symmetric core of the nuclear pore. Science 352, aaf1015 (2016).
pubmed: 27081075 pmcid: 5207208 doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1015
Kosinski, J. et al. Molecular architecture of the inner ring scaffold of the human nuclear pore complex. Science 352, 363–365 (2016).
pubmed: 27081072 doi: 10.1126/science.aaf0643
Stuwe, T. et al. Architecture of the nuclear pore complex coat. Science 347, 1148–1152 (2015).
pubmed: 25745173 pmcid: 5180592 doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4136
Hampoelz, B., Andres-Pons, A., Kastritis, P. & Beck, M. Structure and Assembly of the Nuclear Pore Complex. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 48, 515–536 (2019).
pubmed: 30943044 doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115308
Zhang, Y. et al. Molecular architecture of the luminal ring of the Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex. Cell Res. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-0320-y (2020).
Tan, Y. Z. et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. Methods 14, 793–796 (2017).
pubmed: 28671674 pmcid: 5533649 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4347
Kelley, K., Knockenhauer, K. E., Kabachinski, G. & Schwartz, T. U. Atomic structure of the Y complex of the nuclear pore. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 425–431 (2015).
pubmed: 25822992 pmcid: 4424061 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2998
Wall, M. A. et al. The structure of the G protein heterotrimer Gi alpha 1 beta 1 gamma 2. Cell 83, 1047–1058 (1995).
pubmed: 8521505 doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90220-1
Berke, I. C., Boehmer, T., Blobel, G. & Schwartz, T. U. Structural and functional analysis of Nup133 domains reveals modular building blocks of the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 167, 591–597 (2004).
pubmed: 15557116 pmcid: 2172596 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200408109
Whittle, J. R. & Schwartz, T. U. Architectural nucleoporins Nup157/170 and Nup133 are structurally related and descend from a second ancestral element. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 28442–28452 (2009).
pubmed: 19674973 pmcid: 2788893 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.023580
Boehmer, T., Jeudy, S., Berke, I. C. & Schwartz, T. U. Structural and functional studies of Nup107/Nup133 interaction and its implications for the architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Mol. Cell 30, 721–731 (2008).
pubmed: 18570875 pmcid: 2446439 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.022
Bailer, S. M., Balduf, C. & Hurt, E. The Nsp1p carboxy-terminal domain is organized into functionally distinct coiled-coil regions required for assembly of nucleoporin subcomplexes and nucleocytoplasmic transport. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 7944–7955 (2001).
pubmed: 11689687 pmcid: 99963 doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.23.7944-7955.2001
Brohawn, S. G., Partridge, J. R., Whittle, J. R. & Schwartz, T. U. The nuclear pore complex has entered the atomic age. Structure 17, 1156–1168 (2009).
pubmed: 19748337 pmcid: 2776643 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.07.014
Wu, J., Matunis, M. J., Kraemer, D., Blobel, G. & Coutavas, E. Nup358, a cytoplasmically exposed nucleoporin with peptide repeats, Ran-GTP binding sites, zinc fingers, a cyclophilin A homologous domain, and a leucine-rich region. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14209–14213 (1995).
pubmed: 7775481 doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.23.14209
Yokoyama, N. et al. A giant nucleopore protein that binds Ran/TC4. Nature 376, 184–188 (1995).
pubmed: 7603572 doi: 10.1038/376184a0
Kassube, S. A. et al. Crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of Nup358/RanBP2. J. Mol. Biol. 423, 752–765 (2012).
pubmed: 22959972 pmcid: 4226657 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.08.026
Madeira, F. et al. The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W636–W641 (2019).
pubmed: 30976793 pmcid: 6602479 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz268
Ori, A. et al. Cell type-specific nuclear pores: a case in point for context-dependent stoichiometry of molecular machines. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 648 (2013).
pubmed: 23511206 pmcid: 3619942 doi: 10.1038/msb.2013.4
Schwartz, T. U. Modularity within the architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15, 221–226 (2005).
pubmed: 15837182 doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.03.003
Stuwe, T. et al. Architecture of the fungal nuclear pore inner ring complex. Science 350, 56–64 (2015).
pubmed: 26316600 pmcid: 4826903 doi: 10.1126/science.aac9176
Stuwe, T., Lin, D. H., Collins, L. N., Hurt, E. & Hoelz, A. Evidence for an evolutionary relationship between the large adaptor nucleoporin Nup192 and karyopherins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2530–2535 (2014).
pubmed: 24505056 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311081111
Yachdav, G. et al. PredictProtein-an open resource for online prediction of protein structural and functional features. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W337–W343 (2014).
pubmed: 24799431 pmcid: 4086098 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku366
Andersen, K. R. et al. Scaffold nucleoporins Nup188 and Nup192 share structural and functional properties with nuclear transport receptors. Elife 2, e00745 (2013).
pubmed: 23795296 pmcid: 3679522 doi: 10.7554/eLife.00745
Grandi, P. et al. A novel nuclear pore protein Nup82p which specifically binds to a fraction of Nsp1p. J. Cell Biol. 130, 1263–1273 (1995).
pubmed: 7559750 doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.6.1263
Belgareh, N. et al. Functional characterization of a Nup159p-containing nuclear pore subcomplex. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3475–3492 (1998).
pubmed: 9843582 pmcid: 25658 doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.12.3475
Napetschnig, J., Blobel, G. & Hoelz, A. Crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of the human protooncogene Nup214/CAN. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 1783–1788 (2007).
pubmed: 17264208 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610828104
Yoshida, K., Seo, H. S., Debler, E. W., Blobel, G. & Hoelz, A. Structural and functional analysis of an essential nucleoporin heterotrimer on the cytoplasmic face of the nuclear pore complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16571–16576 (2011).
pubmed: 21930948 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112846108
Fernandez-Martinez, J. et al. Structure and function of the nuclear pore complex cytoplasmic mRNA export platform. Cell 167, 1215–1228 e1225 (2016).
pubmed: 27839866 pmcid: 5130164 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.028
Teimer, R., Kosinski, J., von Appen, A., Beck, M. & Hurt, E. A short linear motif in scaffold Nup145C connects Y-complex with pre-assembled outer ring Nup82 complex. Nat. Commun. 8, 1107 (2017).
pubmed: 29062044 pmcid: 5653651 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01160-9
Hutten, S., Flotho, A., Melchior, F. & Kehlenbach, R. H. The Nup358-RanGAP complex is required for efficient importin alpha/beta-dependent nuclear import. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 2300–2310 (2008).
pubmed: 18305100 pmcid: 2366868 doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-12-1279
Hutten, S., Walde, S., Spillner, C., Hauber, J. & Kehlenbach, R. H. The nuclear pore component Nup358 promotes transportin-dependent nuclear import. J. Cell Sci. 122, 1100–1110 (2009).
pubmed: 19299463 doi: 10.1242/jcs.040154
Hamada, M. et al. Ran-dependent docking of importin-beta to RanBP2/Nup358 filaments is essential for protein import and cell viability. J. Cell Biol. 194, 597–612 (2011).
pubmed: 21859863 pmcid: 3160583 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201102018
Mahadevan, K. et al. RanBP2/Nup358 potentiates the translation of a subset of mRNAs encoding secretory proteins. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001545 (2013).
pubmed: 23630457 pmcid: 3635865 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001545
Joseph, J. & Dasso, M. The nucleoporin Nup358 associates with and regulates interphase microtubules. FEBS Lett. 582, 190–196 (2008).
pubmed: 18070602 doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.11.087
Schmitt, C. et al. Dbp5, a DEAD-box protein required for mRNA export, is recruited to the cytoplasmic fibrils of nuclear pore complex via a conserved interaction with CAN/Nup159p. EMBO J. 18, 4332–4347 (1999).
pubmed: 10428971 pmcid: 1171509 doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.15.4332
Hodge, C. A. et al. The Dbp5 cycle at the nuclear pore complex during mRNA export I: dbp5 mutants with defects in RNA binding and ATP hydrolysis define key steps for Nup159 and Gle1. Genes Dev. 25, 1052–1064 (2011).
pubmed: 21576265 pmcid: 3093121 doi: 10.1101/gad.2041611
Lei, J. & Frank, J. Automated acquisition of cryo-electron micrographs for single particle reconstruction on an FEI Tecnai electron microscope. J. Struct. Biol. 150, 69–80 (2005).
pubmed: 15797731 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.01.002
Li, X. et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 10, 584–590 (2013).
pubmed: 23644547 pmcid: 3684049 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2472
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
pubmed: 28250466 pmcid: 5494038 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193
Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
pubmed: 26592709 pmcid: 4711343 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, 1–22 (2018).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.42166
Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).
pubmed: 23000701 pmcid: 3690530 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006
Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).
pubmed: 14568533 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013
Chen, S. et al. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 135, 24–35 (2013).
pubmed: 23872039 pmcid: 3834153 doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.06.004
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
pubmed: 15264254 doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
Guex, N. & Peitsch, M. C. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18, 2714–2723 (1997).
pubmed: 9504803 doi: 10.1002/elps.1150181505
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
pubmed: 15572765 doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158
Roy, A., Kucukural, A. & Zhang, Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 5, 725–738 (2010).
pubmed: 20360767 pmcid: 2849174 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.5
Chug, H., Trakhanov, S., Hulsmann, B. B., Pleiner, T. & Gorlich, D. Crystal structure of the metazoan Nup62*Nup58*Nup54 nucleoporin complex. Science 350, 106–110 (2015).
pubmed: 26292704 doi: 10.1126/science.aac7420
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
pubmed: 20124702 pmcid: 2815670 doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925
Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).
pubmed: 28710774 doi: 10.1002/pro.3235

Auteurs

Gaoxingyu Huang (G)

Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology & Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Yanqing Zhang (Y)

Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310024, China.
Institute of Biology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310024, China.

Xuechen Zhu (X)

Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310024, China.
Institute of Biology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310024, China.

Chao Zeng (C)

Tsinghua University-Peking University Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Qifan Wang (Q)

Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology & Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Qiang Zhou (Q)

Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310024, China.
Institute of Biology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310024, China.

Qinghua Tao (Q)

Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology & Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Minhao Liu (M)

Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology & Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Jianlin Lei (J)

Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology & Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Chuangye Yan (C)

Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology & Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Yigong Shi (Y)

Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology & Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. syg@westlake.edu.cn.
Key Laboratory of Structural Biology of Zhejiang Province, School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310024, China. syg@westlake.edu.cn.
Institute of Biology, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310024, China. syg@westlake.edu.cn.
Tsinghua University-Peking University Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. syg@westlake.edu.cn.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice

Classifications MeSH