Effects of Graft Selection in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Midterm Functional Results.
Anterior tibial tendon allograft
anterior cruciate ligament injury
hamstring tendon autograft
Journal
Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni
ISSN: 1302-7123
Titre abrégé: Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 9424130
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
04
04
2018
accepted:
21
05
2018
entrez:
8
5
2020
pubmed:
8
5
2020
medline:
8
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study is a comparison of the midterm clinical results of patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using an allograft and those who had an autograft procedure. The results of 70 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with an anterior tibial tendon (ATT) allograft (n=18) or a hamstring (HT) autograft (n=52) were evaluated retrospectively. At the last follow-up, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner-Lysholm scores were used to assess functional status, as well as results of the Lachman test, the anterior drawer test, and the pivot-shift test. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of age, gender, length of time before operation, graft thickness, or femoral tunnel length (p>0.05). The results were satisfactory in both groups in the postoperative period in terms of the length of time until a return to sports, IKDC score, Tegner-Lysholm score, range of motion, quadriceps circumference, and laxity, with no significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). The results of this study suggested that midterm clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction with an ATT allograft or an HT autograft are similar when the correct technique is used according to the appropriate indications by an experienced surgeon and a successful rehabilitation program implemented after the operation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32377119
doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2018.23281
pii: MBSEH-53-419
pmc: PMC7192287
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
419-425Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2019 by The Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.
Références
World J Orthop. 2014 Jan 18;5(1):23-9
pubmed: 24649411
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(10):739-44
pubmed: 17106388
J Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Dec;11(4):211-9
pubmed: 21181226
Arthroscopy. 2004 Nov;20(9):974-80
pubmed: 15525931
Knee. 2004 Feb;11(1):37-9
pubmed: 14967326
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005 May-Jun;13(3):197-207
pubmed: 15938608
Clin Sports Med. 2009 Apr;28(2):223-44, viii
pubmed: 19306732
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):492-9
pubmed: 23928319
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Sep;466(9):2238-46
pubmed: 18575944
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Jan;85(1):12-6
pubmed: 12585571
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2501-9
pubmed: 26311445
Int Orthop. 2013 Feb;37(2):207-12
pubmed: 23052280
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Jun;78(6):814-25
pubmed: 8666598
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2009 Dec;17(4):242-6
pubmed: 19910782
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Dec 5;128(23):3163-6
pubmed: 26612290
Res Sports Med. 2012 Jul;20(3-4):157-79
pubmed: 22742074
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012 Mar;18(2):153-61
pubmed: 22792822
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Sep;91(9):2242-50
pubmed: 19724004