Motherhood after cancer: fertility and utilisation of fertility-preservation methods.
Cancer
Fertility preservation
Follow-up
GnRH agonists
Ovarian cryopreservation
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
18
11
2019
accepted:
25
04
2020
pubmed:
8
5
2020
medline:
9
9
2020
entrez:
8
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Due to modern and individualised treatments, women at reproductive age have a high survival rate after cancer therapy. What are pregnancy and birth rates of women after cancer and how often do they use cryopreserved ovarian tissue or gametes? From 2007 to 2015, 162 women aged 26.7 ± 6.9 years were counselled for fertility preservation at a single University Fertility Centre. A questionnaire study was performed in average 3 and 6 years after the diagnosis of cancer. The women were asked about their fertility, partnership, family planning, and pregnancy history. 72 women (51%) answered a written questionnaire in 2016. 59 women were reached again by phone in 2019 (82%). The preferred method of fertility preservation was ovarian tissue cryopreservation (n = 36, 50%); none of the women had ovarian hyperstimulation in order to cryopreserve oocytes. About 3 years after treatment, 37 women of 72 women (51%) of the women with a mean age of 29.9 years had a strong wish to conceive. 21/72 (29%) had actively tried to conceive after successful cancer treatment; eight women (11%) were already pregnant or had children. Six years after cancer diagnosis 16/59 (27%) women had ongoing anticancer treatment. 12/59 (20%) were pregnant or had children, while 39% (23/59) had no menstrual cycle. Only one woman used her cryopreserved ovarian tissue, but did not become pregnant. After cancer and gonadotoxic treatment, women's desire to have a child is substantial. In this study, the rate of spontaneous pregnancies and births was 20% 6 years after gonadotoxic therapies. Not every woman, however, has the opportunity to conceive: factors impairing fertility include ongoing cancer treatment or persistent disease, no partner, no menstrual cycle, as well as other reasons for infertility.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32377787
doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05563-w
pii: 10.1007/s00404-020-05563-w
pmc: PMC7246243
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1579-1588Références
Website of the German network for fertility preservation. https://fertiprotekt.com/fertiprotektnetwork . Accessed 18 Nov 2019
Von Wolff M, Dittrich R, Liebenthron J, Nawroth F, Schüring AN, Bruckner T, Germeyer A (2015) Fertility-preservation counseling and treatment for medical reasons: data from a multinational network of over 5000 women. Reprod Biomed Online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.07.013
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.07.013
German guideline for fertility preservation for women with oncologic diseases. https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/015-082l_S2k_Fertilitaetserhaltung-bei-onkologischen-Therapien_2017-12.pdf . Accessed 18 Nov 2019
Schüring AN, Fehm T, Behringer K, Goeckenjan M, Wimberger P, Henes M, Henes J, Fey MF, von Wolff M (2018) Practical recommendations for fertility preservation in women by the FertiPROTEKT network Part I Indications for fertility preservation. Arch Gynecol Obstet. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4594-3
doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4594-3
pubmed: 30523440
Boettcher B, Goeckenjan M (2018) In: Ethics and Oncology: New issues of therapy, treatment, care, and, research. Arnason, Bobbert (Ed). Freiburg, Verlag Karl Alber Ann Arbor, Michigan ProQuest
Müller A, Keller K, Wacker J, Dittrich R, Keck G, Montag M, Van der Ven H, Wachter D, Beckmann M, Distler W (2012) Retransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: the first live birth in Germany. Dtsch Arztebl Int. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2012.0008
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0008
pubmed: 23372613
pmcid: 3553394
Beckmann MW, Lotz L, Toth B, Baston-Büst DM, Fehm T, Frambach T, Germeyer G, Goeckenjan M, Häberlin F, Henes M, Hirchenhain J, Hübner S, Korell M, Krüssel JS, Müller A, Reinsberg J, Schwab R, Seitz S, Sütterlin M, van der Ven H, van der Ven K, Winkler-Crepaz K, Wimberger P, von Wolff M, Liebenthron L, Dittrich R (2019) Concept paper on the technique of cryopreservation, removal and transplantation of ovarian tissue for fertility preservation. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0664-8619
doi: 10.1055/a-0664-8619
pubmed: 31680701
pmcid: 6805182
Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Marklund A, Lundberg F, Wikander I, Milenkovic M, Anstacio A, Sergouniotis F, Wanggren K, Ekengren J, Lind T, Borgström B (2019) A prospective study of women and girls undergoing fertility preservation due to oncologic and non-oncologic indications in Sweden-Trends in patients' choices and benefit of the chosen methods after long-term follow up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13559
doi: 10.1111/aogs.13559
pubmed: 31002176
Lambertini M, Moore HCF, Leonard RCF, Loibl S, Munster P, Bruzzone M, Boni L, Unger JM, Anderson RA, Mehta K, Minton S, Poggio F, Albain KS, Adamson DJA, Gerber B, Cripps A, Bertelli G, Seiler S, Ceppi M, Partridge AH, Del Mastro L (2018) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy for preservation of ovarian function and fertility in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient-level data. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.0858
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.0858
pubmed: 30407898
pmcid: 6804855
Muteshi C, Child T, Ohuma E, Fatum M (2018) Ovarian response and follow-up outcomes in women diagnosed with cancer having fertility preservation: comparison of random start and early follicular phase stimulation—cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.09.007
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.09.007
pubmed: 30227359
Beckmann MW, Dittrich R, Lotz L, van der Ven K, van der Ven HH, Liebenthron J, Korrell M, Frambach T, Sütterlin M, Schwab R, Seitz S, Müller A, von Wolff M, Häberlin F, Henes M, Winkler-Crepaz K, Krüssel JS, Germey A, Toth B (2018) Fertility protection: complications of surgery and results of removal and transplantation of ovarian tissue. Reprod Biomed Online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.10.109
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.10.109
pubmed: 29198423
Ruggeri M, Pagan E, Bagnardi V, Bianco N, Gallerani E, Buser K, Gianni M, Giordano L, Rabaglio M, Freschi A, Cretella E, Clerico M, Farolfi A, Simoncini E, Ciccarese M, Rauch D, Ramell M, Glaus A, Berardi R, Pellanda AF, Ribi K, Gelber S, Partridge AH, Goldhirsch A, Pagani O (2019) Fertility concerns, preservation strategies and quality of life in young women with breast cancer: baseline results form an ongoing prospective cohort study in selected European Centers. Breast 47:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.07.001
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.07.001
pubmed: 31362134
Lantsberg D, Farhi A, Zaslavsky-Paltiel I, Silverman BG, Lerner-Geva L, Orvieto R (2019) Deliveries following fertility preservation by ovarian tissue cryopreservation without autotransplantation-what should be expected? J Assist Reprod Genet 36(2):335–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1341-z
doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1341-z
pubmed: 30374733
Chatterton F, Kay V (2018) An audit of Ninewells Hospital fertility preservation service. J Obstet Gynaecol. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2018.1444396
doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1444396
pubmed: 29944041