Effect of Combined Immune Checkpoint Inhibition vs Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer: The Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 Study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ adverse effects
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ adverse effects
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
B7-H1 Antigen
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Canada
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ mortality
Female
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Immunotherapy
/ adverse effects
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Palliative Care
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Progression-Free Survival
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2020
01 06 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
8
5
2020
medline:
23
1
2021
entrez:
8
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibition has not shown activities in advanced refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), other than in those patients who are microsatellite-instability high (MSI-H). To evaluate whether combining programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibition improved patient survival in metastatic refractory CRC. A randomized phase 2 study was conducted in 27 cancer centers across Canada between August 2016 and June 2017, and data were analyzed on October 18, 2018. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; received all available standard systemic therapies (fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab if appropriate; cetuximab or panitumumab if RAS wild-type tumors; regorafenib if available); were aged 18 years or older; had adequate organ function; had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and measurable disease. We randomly assigned patients to receive either 75 mg of tremelimumab every 28 days for the first 4 cycles plus 1500 mg durvalumab every 28 days, or best supportive care alone (BSC) in a 2:1 ratio. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and a 2-sided P<.10 was considered statistically significant. Circulating cell-free DNA from baseline plasma was used to determine microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB). Of 180 patients enrolled (121 men [67.2%] and 59 women [32.8%]; median [range] age, 65 [36-87] years), 179 were treated. With a median follow-up of 15.2 months, the median OS was 6.6 months for durvalumab and tremelimumab and 4.1 months for BSC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 90% CI, 0.54-0.97; P = .07). Progression-free survival was 1.8 months and 1.9 months respectively (HR, 1.01; 90% CI, 0.76-1.34). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were significantly more frequent with immunotherapy (75 [64%] patients in the treatment group had at least 1 grade 3 or higher adverse event vs 12 [20%] in the BSC group). Circulating cell-free DNA analysis was successful in 168 of 169 patients with available samples. In patients who were microsatellite stable (MSS), OS was significantly improved with durvalumab and tremelimumab (HR, 0.66; 90% CI, 0.49-0.89; P = .02). Patients who were MSS with plasma TMB of 28 variants per megabase or more (21% of MSS patients) had the greatest OS benefit (HR, 0.34; 90% CI, 0.18-0.63; P = .004). This phase 2 study suggests that combined immune checkpoint inhibition with durvalumab plus tremelimumab may be associated with prolonged OS in patients with advanced refractory CRC. Elevated plasma TMB may select patients most likely to benefit from durvalumab and tremelimumab. Further confirmation studies are warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02870920.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32379280
pii: 2765332
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0910
pmc: PMC7206536
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
CD274 protein, human
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
PDCD1 protein, human
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
durvalumab
28X28X9OKV
tremelimumab
QEN1X95CIX
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02870920']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
831-838Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Ann Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;30(7):1096-1103
pubmed: 31038663
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20
pubmed: 26028255
Lancet. 2013 Jan 26;381(9863):303-12
pubmed: 23177514
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34
pubmed: 30620402
Eur J Cancer. 2002 Mar;38 Suppl 4:S125-33
pubmed: 11858978
J Clin Oncol. 2019 May 10;37(14):1217-1227
pubmed: 30865548
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):773-779
pubmed: 29355075
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar;17(3):299-308
pubmed: 26858122
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2093-2104
pubmed: 29658845
Cancer Cell. 2018 May 14;33(5):843-852.e4
pubmed: 29657128
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 14;372(20):1909-19
pubmed: 25970050
JAMA. 2017 Jun 20;317(23):2392-2401
pubmed: 28632865
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):1426-1434
pubmed: 27575024
Cell. 2017 Nov 2;171(4):934-949.e16
pubmed: 29033130
Lancet. 2018 Feb 24;391(10122):748-757
pubmed: 29268948
Science. 2019 May 3;364(6439):485-491
pubmed: 31048490
Science. 2019 Dec 20;366(6472):1473-1480
pubmed: 31699882
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1182-1191
pubmed: 28734759
Science. 2017 Jul 28;357(6349):409-413
pubmed: 28596308
Nat Genet. 2019 Feb;51(2):202-206
pubmed: 30643254