Factors related to health civic engagement: results from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes to understand progress towards a Culture of Health.
Activities of Daily Living
Adult
Attitude to Health
Charities
/ statistics & numerical data
Community Participation
/ statistics & numerical data
Ethnicity
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Helping Behavior
Humans
Income
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Politics
Social Responsibility
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Volunteers
/ psychology
Civic engagement
Community health investment
Health civic engagement
Sense of community
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 May 2020
07 May 2020
Historique:
received:
23
10
2019
accepted:
11
03
2020
entrez:
9
5
2020
pubmed:
10
5
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Civic engagement, including voting, volunteering, and participating in civic organizations, is associated with better psychological, physical and behavioral health and well-being. In addition, civic engagement is increasingly viewed (e.g., in Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Culture of Health action framework) as a potentially important driver for raising awareness of and addressing unhealthy conditions in communities. As such, it is important to understand the factors that may promote civic engagement, with a particular focus on the less-understood, health civic engagement, or civic engagement in health-related and health-specific activities. Using data from a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States (U.S.), we examined whether the extent to which individuals feel they belong in their community (i.e., perceived sense of community) and the value they placed on investing in community health were associated with individuals' health civic engagement. Using data collected on 7187 nationally representative respondents from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes, we examined associations between sense of community, valued investment in community health, and perceived barriers to taking action to invest in community health, with health civic engagement. We constructed continuous scales for each of these constructs and employed multiple linear regressions adjusting for multiple covariates including U.S. region and city size of residence, educational attainment, family income, race/ethnicity, household size, employment status, and years living in the community. Participants who endorsed (i.e., responded with mostly or completely) all 16 sense of community scale items endorsed an average of 22.8% (95%CI: 19.8-25.7%) more of the health civic engagement scale items compared with respondents who did not endorse any of the sense of community items. Those who endorsed (responded that it was an important or top priority) all items capturing valued investment in community health endorsed 14.0% (95%CI: 11.2-16.8%) more of the health civic engagement items than those who did not endorse any valued investment in community health items. Health civic engagement, including voting and volunteering to ultimately guide government decisions about health issues, may help improve conditions that influence health and well-being for all. Focusing on individuals' sense of community and highlighting investments in community health may concurrently be associated with increased health civic engagement and improved community and population health.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Civic engagement, including voting, volunteering, and participating in civic organizations, is associated with better psychological, physical and behavioral health and well-being. In addition, civic engagement is increasingly viewed (e.g., in Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Culture of Health action framework) as a potentially important driver for raising awareness of and addressing unhealthy conditions in communities. As such, it is important to understand the factors that may promote civic engagement, with a particular focus on the less-understood, health civic engagement, or civic engagement in health-related and health-specific activities. Using data from a nationally representative sample of adults in the United States (U.S.), we examined whether the extent to which individuals feel they belong in their community (i.e., perceived sense of community) and the value they placed on investing in community health were associated with individuals' health civic engagement.
METHODS
METHODS
Using data collected on 7187 nationally representative respondents from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes, we examined associations between sense of community, valued investment in community health, and perceived barriers to taking action to invest in community health, with health civic engagement. We constructed continuous scales for each of these constructs and employed multiple linear regressions adjusting for multiple covariates including U.S. region and city size of residence, educational attainment, family income, race/ethnicity, household size, employment status, and years living in the community.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Participants who endorsed (i.e., responded with mostly or completely) all 16 sense of community scale items endorsed an average of 22.8% (95%CI: 19.8-25.7%) more of the health civic engagement scale items compared with respondents who did not endorse any of the sense of community items. Those who endorsed (responded that it was an important or top priority) all items capturing valued investment in community health endorsed 14.0% (95%CI: 11.2-16.8%) more of the health civic engagement items than those who did not endorse any valued investment in community health items.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Health civic engagement, including voting and volunteering to ultimately guide government decisions about health issues, may help improve conditions that influence health and well-being for all. Focusing on individuals' sense of community and highlighting investments in community health may concurrently be associated with increased health civic engagement and improved community and population health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32380964
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08507-w
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-08507-w
pmc: PMC7203885
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
635Subventions
Organisme : Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
ID : Contract #74430
Références
Milbank Q. 2003;81(4):603-26
pubmed: 14678481
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:289-296
pubmed: 27085743
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Mar;18(3):371-6
pubmed: 25957339
Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:381-98
pubmed: 21091195
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Dec;40(6):1115-55
pubmed: 26447024
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Nov 1;35(11):1959-1963
pubmed: 27834233
Eur J Public Health. 2007 Aug;17(4):400-1
pubmed: 17470465
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:201-205
pubmed: 27506853
Int J Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;36(6):1161-4
pubmed: 18056123
Am J Health Promot. 2001 Jan-Feb;15(3):149-66
pubmed: 11265579
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:134-41
pubmed: 25616195
J Community Psychol. 2019 Mar;47(2):254-271
pubmed: 30125978
Ethics Int Aff. 2002;16(2):47-55
pubmed: 15709278
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 May;71(5):475-479
pubmed: 27965314
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:385-98
pubmed: 24328986
J Health Psychol. 2014 Jan;19(1):60-71
pubmed: 24000385
Am J Public Health. 2001 Jan;91(1):99-104
pubmed: 11189832
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Mar;27(2):424-436
pubmed: 30270467
Soc Sci Q. 2015 Nov;96(5):1226-1243
pubmed: 26924857
Politics Life Sci. 2015 Spring;34(1):28-43
pubmed: 26399944
Gerontologist. 2010 Oct;50(5):594-602
pubmed: 20172902