Defining preconception: exploring the concept of a preconception population.


Journal

BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 May 2020
Historique:
received: 28 08 2019
accepted: 28 04 2020
entrez: 9 5 2020
pubmed: 10 5 2020
medline: 26 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Health prior to conception can significantly impact offspring health, however, a clear definition of the attributes of the preconception population is currently lacking. We aimed to use existing literature to explore the concept and attributes of a preconception population by: [1] identifying characteristics and research recruitment methods; and [2] generating an attribute-based working definition of a preconception population. A rapid review of current literature using CINAHL and the subject heading 'pre-pregnancy care' was conducted (Stage 1). Data extracted included definitions of preconception, participant inclusion/exclusion criteria, participant characteristics, and recruitment methods. Stage 2 involved a wider search of relevant publications beyond peer-reviewed literature followed by a concept analysis of the phrase "preconception population" applying Walker and Avant's framework (Stage 2). Twenty-three papers (19 studies) were included in Stage 1. "Preconception" was explicitly defined in one study. Twelve studies specified participants must be planning a pregnancy. Stage 2 included 33 publications. Four key perspectives for the concept of the preconception population were derived: [1] intentional; [2] potential; [3] public health; and [4] life course. Adopting these perspectives may allow researchers to accurately define, identify and recruit preconception populations and to develop interventions that are appropriately broad or tailored depending on population needs. We hope the definitions will facilitate research with this population and will subsequently improve the wellbeing of preconception men and women, which is essential to ensuring the health of future generations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Health prior to conception can significantly impact offspring health, however, a clear definition of the attributes of the preconception population is currently lacking. We aimed to use existing literature to explore the concept and attributes of a preconception population by: [1] identifying characteristics and research recruitment methods; and [2] generating an attribute-based working definition of a preconception population.
METHODS METHODS
A rapid review of current literature using CINAHL and the subject heading 'pre-pregnancy care' was conducted (Stage 1). Data extracted included definitions of preconception, participant inclusion/exclusion criteria, participant characteristics, and recruitment methods. Stage 2 involved a wider search of relevant publications beyond peer-reviewed literature followed by a concept analysis of the phrase "preconception population" applying Walker and Avant's framework (Stage 2).
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty-three papers (19 studies) were included in Stage 1. "Preconception" was explicitly defined in one study. Twelve studies specified participants must be planning a pregnancy. Stage 2 included 33 publications. Four key perspectives for the concept of the preconception population were derived: [1] intentional; [2] potential; [3] public health; and [4] life course.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Adopting these perspectives may allow researchers to accurately define, identify and recruit preconception populations and to develop interventions that are appropriately broad or tailored depending on population needs. We hope the definitions will facilitate research with this population and will subsequently improve the wellbeing of preconception men and women, which is essential to ensuring the health of future generations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32381056
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02973-1
pii: 10.1186/s12884-020-02973-1
pmc: PMC7206804
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

280

Références

Midwifery. 2016 Feb;33:64-72
pubmed: 26564478
Womens Health Issues. 2008 Jan-Feb;18(1):17-25
pubmed: 17951072
Public Health Nurs. 2008 Jul-Aug;25(4):295-303
pubmed: 18666934
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017 Jan - Feb;46(1):78-90
pubmed: 27837650
Nurs Forum. 2016 Jan-Mar;51(1):55-61
pubmed: 25611085
Early Hum Dev. 2011 Dec;87(12):791-7
pubmed: 21723050
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 1;187(1):60-74
pubmed: 28595290
Clin Nurse Spec. 2017 Mar/Apr;31(2):70-73
pubmed: 28169891
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;20(6):581-9
pubmed: 18989135
Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1229-36
pubmed: 20466970
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 May;96(5):543-546
pubmed: 28176305
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;39(3):919-38
pubmed: 27513464
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 24;12:898
pubmed: 23092451
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1842-1852
pubmed: 29673874
Prev Sci. 2016 Nov;17(8):960-969
pubmed: 27577198
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Apr;6(4):e380-e389
pubmed: 29519649
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 3;374(9):843-52
pubmed: 26962904
Med Care. 2019 Feb;57(2):152-158
pubmed: 30550399
Lancet. 2018 Dec 8;392(10163):2422-2423
pubmed: 30527402
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2017 Dec;14:24-32
pubmed: 29195631
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Jul;25(7):672-9
pubmed: 26828630
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;127(5):863-72
pubmed: 27054935
Prev Med. 2017 Mar;96:1-15
pubmed: 27939264
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;127(4):689-98
pubmed: 26959198
Fam Pract. 2013 Jun;30(3):341-6
pubmed: 23180815
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016 Jan;42(1):75-6
pubmed: 26504110
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 May;58(5):426-33
pubmed: 15082745
Child Obes. 2012 Jun;8(3):195-204
pubmed: 22799545
Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):937-41
pubmed: 22884014
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Apr 15;14:33
pubmed: 24731520
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014 Feb;30(2):90-4
pubmed: 24188449
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):5
pubmed: 28056865
East Mediterr Health J. 2010 Apr;16(4):396-401
pubmed: 20795423
J Adv Nurs. 2012 May;68(5):1156-65
pubmed: 22032346
Nutr Rev. 2017 Jan;75(suppl 1):94-106
pubmed: 28049754
J Affect Disord. 2016 Mar 1;192:56-63
pubmed: 26707348
Matern Child Health J. 2017 May;21(5):1147-1155
pubmed: 28078529
Midwifery. 2018 Apr;59:62-67
pubmed: 29396381
Ind Psychiatry J. 2010 Jan;19(1):60-5
pubmed: 21694795
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1830-1841
pubmed: 29673873
Matern Child Health J. 2011 Feb;15(2):205-16
pubmed: 20012348
Reprod Health. 2016 Apr 14;13:37
pubmed: 27080860
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(12):2172-82
pubmed: 25411780
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Mar;21(3):670-704
pubmed: 28093686
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2017 Jul;22(3):
pubmed: 28407367
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;205(3):203.e1-7
pubmed: 21658667

Auteurs

Briony Hill (B)

Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 1, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia. briony.hill@monash.edu.

Jennifer Hall (J)

EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley St, London, WC1E 6AU, UK.

Helen Skouteris (H)

Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 1, 43-51 Kanooka Grove, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.

Sinéad Currie (S)

Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. sinead.currie@stir.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH