Effectiveness of interventions targeting air travellers for delaying local outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2.
Coronavirus
covid-19
public health emergency of international concern
travel screening
Journal
Journal of travel medicine
ISSN: 1708-8305
Titre abrégé: J Travel Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9434456
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 08 2020
20 08 2020
Historique:
received:
28
02
2020
revised:
20
04
2020
accepted:
04
05
2020
pubmed:
10
5
2020
medline:
4
9
2020
entrez:
9
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We evaluated if interventions aimed at air travellers can delay local severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) community transmission in a previously unaffected country. We simulated infected air travellers arriving into countries with no sustained SARS-CoV-2 transmission or other introduction routes from affected regions. We assessed the effectiveness of syndromic screening at departure and/or arrival and traveller sensitisation to the COVID-2019-like symptoms with the aim to trigger rapid self-isolation and reporting on symptom onset to enable contact tracing. We assumed that syndromic screening would reduce the number of infected arrivals and that traveller sensitisation reduces the average number of secondary cases. We use stochastic simulations to account for uncertainty in both arrival and secondary infections rates, and present sensitivity analyses on arrival rates of infected travellers and the effectiveness of traveller sensitisation. We report the median expected delay achievable in each scenario and an inner 50% interval. Under baseline assumptions, introducing exit and entry screening in combination with traveller sensitisation can delay a local SARS-CoV-2 outbreak by 8 days (50% interval: 3-14 days) when the rate of importation is 1 infected traveller per week at time of introduction. The additional benefit of entry screening is small if exit screening is effective: the combination of only exit screening and traveller sensitisation can delay an outbreak by 7 days (50% interval: 2-13 days). In the absence of screening, with less effective sensitisation, or a higher rate of importation, these delays shrink rapidly to <4 days. Syndromic screening and traveller sensitisation in combination may have marginally delayed SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in unaffected countries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
We evaluated if interventions aimed at air travellers can delay local severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) community transmission in a previously unaffected country.
METHODS
We simulated infected air travellers arriving into countries with no sustained SARS-CoV-2 transmission or other introduction routes from affected regions. We assessed the effectiveness of syndromic screening at departure and/or arrival and traveller sensitisation to the COVID-2019-like symptoms with the aim to trigger rapid self-isolation and reporting on symptom onset to enable contact tracing. We assumed that syndromic screening would reduce the number of infected arrivals and that traveller sensitisation reduces the average number of secondary cases. We use stochastic simulations to account for uncertainty in both arrival and secondary infections rates, and present sensitivity analyses on arrival rates of infected travellers and the effectiveness of traveller sensitisation. We report the median expected delay achievable in each scenario and an inner 50% interval.
RESULTS
Under baseline assumptions, introducing exit and entry screening in combination with traveller sensitisation can delay a local SARS-CoV-2 outbreak by 8 days (50% interval: 3-14 days) when the rate of importation is 1 infected traveller per week at time of introduction. The additional benefit of entry screening is small if exit screening is effective: the combination of only exit screening and traveller sensitisation can delay an outbreak by 7 days (50% interval: 2-13 days). In the absence of screening, with less effective sensitisation, or a higher rate of importation, these delays shrink rapidly to <4 days.
CONCLUSION
Syndromic screening and traveller sensitisation in combination may have marginally delayed SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in unaffected countries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32384159
pii: 5834629
doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa068
pmc: PMC7239177
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 208812/Z/17/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 210758/Z/18/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© International Society of Travel Medicine 2020.
Références
BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Mar 30;10:82
pubmed: 20353566
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1199-1207
pubmed: 31995857
Euro Surveill. 2009 Feb 12;14(6):
pubmed: 19215720
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491):
pubmed: 32234805
PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(6):e1003277
pubmed: 23785276
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):689-697
pubmed: 32014114
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(4):
pubmed: 32019669
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 May;26(5):1049-1052
pubmed: 32053479
Elife. 2020 Feb 24;9:
pubmed: 32091395
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1545-1546
pubmed: 32167538
Math Biosci. 2008 Jul-Aug;214(1-2):70-2
pubmed: 18387639
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 31;117(13):7504-7509
pubmed: 32170017
Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):755
pubmed: 32145772
BMJ. 2014 Oct 14;349:g6202
pubmed: 25316030
Nat Commun. 2018 Jan 15;9(1):218
pubmed: 29335536
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Apr 9;5:67
pubmed: 32685698
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 May 1;91(5):368-76
pubmed: 23678200
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Apr;8(4):e488-e496
pubmed: 32119825
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1243-1244
pubmed: 32077901
J Travel Med. 2020 May 18;27(3):
pubmed: 32167146
Nature. 2005 Nov 17;438(7066):355-9
pubmed: 16292310
Stat Med. 2006 Jun 15;25(11):1826-39
pubmed: 16345017
Euro Surveill. 2020 Feb;25(5):
pubmed: 32046816