Mesenchymal stromal cell therapeutic potency is dependent upon viability, route of delivery, and immune match.
Journal
Blood advances
ISSN: 2473-9537
Titre abrégé: Blood Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101698425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 05 2020
12 05 2020
Historique:
received:
20
02
2020
accepted:
12
04
2020
entrez:
9
5
2020
pubmed:
10
5
2020
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Culture-adapted bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) deploy paracrine anti-inflammatory and tissue regenerative functionalities that can be harnessed as a living cell pharmaceutical product. Independent of clinical indication, a near majority of human clinical trials administer MSC IV, often with an allogeneic MSC cell product immediately after thawing from cryostorage. Despite hundreds of studies in a wide assortment of inflammatory, degenerative, and acute tissue injury syndromes, human clinical outcomes often fail to mirror promising rigorously conducted preclinical animal studies. Using a mouse model of toxic colitis, we demonstrate that replication fit MSCs harvested in log phase of growth have substantial impact on colitis clinical and pathologic endpoints when delivered subcutaneously or intraperitoneally, whereas the maximum tolerated IV bolus dosing failed to do so. We also demonstrate that heat-inactivated MSCs lose all therapeutic utility and the observation is mirrored by use of viable MSC administered immediately postthaw from cryostorage. Using luciferase transgenic MSC as donor cells, we demonstrate that transient in vivo engraftment is severely compromised when MSCs are dead or thawed and further demonstrate that MSC redosing is feasible in relapsing colitis, but only syngeneic MSCs lead to sustained improvement of clinical endpoints. These data support the notion that pharmaceutical potency of MSC requires viability and functional fitness. Reciprocally, IV administration of thawed MSC products may be biased against positive clinical outcomes for treatment of colitis and that extravascular administration of syngeneic, fit MSCs allows for effect in a recurrent therapy model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32384543
pii: S2473-9529(20)31331-8
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001711
pmc: PMC7218435
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1987-1997Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA014520
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK109508
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.
Références
Trends Mol Med. 2019 Feb;25(2):149-163
pubmed: 30711482
Drugs Today (Barc). 2019 Feb;55(2):95-105
pubmed: 30816884
Cell Rep. 2020 Feb 11;30(6):1923-1934.e4
pubmed: 32049021
Cell Rep. 2018 Feb 27;22(9):2504-2517
pubmed: 29490284
Nat Immunol. 2014 Nov;15(11):1009-16
pubmed: 25329189
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jan;45(2):205-221
pubmed: 27878827
Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315-7
pubmed: 16923606
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;951:77-98
pubmed: 27837556
Cytotherapy. 2013 Jan;15(1):2-8
pubmed: 23260081
Cell Stem Cell. 2018 Jun 01;22(6):824-833
pubmed: 29859173
Sci Transl Med. 2017 Nov 15;9(416):
pubmed: 29141887
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 May;26(5):855-864
pubmed: 32044400
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 11;61(23):2329-38
pubmed: 23583246
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020 Jan;9(1):17-27
pubmed: 31804767
Gastroenterology. 2018 Apr;154(5):1334-1342.e4
pubmed: 29277560
Nat Med. 2013 Jan;19(1):35-42
pubmed: 23296015
Stem Cells. 2016 Sep;34(9):2429-42
pubmed: 27299362
Cytotherapy. 2012 Feb;14(2):147-52
pubmed: 22029655
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2009 Mar;15(3):341-52
pubmed: 18942757
Blood Adv. 2017 Apr 25;1(11):628-643
pubmed: 28713871
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020 Jan;9(1):131-144
pubmed: 31613054
Cytotherapy. 2018 Feb;20(2):232-244
pubmed: 29167063
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 2;9(1):18078
pubmed: 31792313
Lancet Neurol. 2017 May;16(5):360-368
pubmed: 28320635
Stem Cells Dev. 2012 Apr 10;21(6):901-10
pubmed: 21663543
Blood. 2006 Sep 15;108(6):2114-20
pubmed: 16690970
Stem Cells Int. 2013;2013:678063
pubmed: 24222773
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 May;26(5):835-844
pubmed: 31505228
Sci Transl Med. 2019 Feb 20;11(480):
pubmed: 30787168
JGH Open. 2019 Feb 13;3(3):249-260
pubmed: 31276044
J Biol Chem. 2009 Dec 4;284(49):34342-54
pubmed: 19833726
Lancet. 2008 May 10;371(9624):1579-86
pubmed: 18468541
Stem Cells Dev. 2016 Sep 15;25(18):1342-54
pubmed: 27349989
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Feb;18(2):160-8
pubmed: 26662998
Cytotherapy. 2015 Jan;17(1):38-45
pubmed: 25457275
Cytotherapy. 2012 Nov;14(10):1164-70
pubmed: 22574720
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 May;26(5):845-854
pubmed: 32018062
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 May;26(5):e89-e91
pubmed: 32156632
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003 May;31(10):839-45
pubmed: 12748658
Immunity. 2011 Apr 22;34(4):590-601
pubmed: 21458307
Stem Cells. 2014 Sep;32(9):2430-42
pubmed: 24805247
Nat Med. 2013 Jul;19(7):812-3
pubmed: 23836217
Int J Cardiol. 2013 May 10;165(2):333-40
pubmed: 22475845
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 Aug;14(8):493-507
pubmed: 29895977
Blood. 2005 Dec 15;106(13):4057-65
pubmed: 16118325
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Feb;7(2):154-162
pubmed: 30455077
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1281-90
pubmed: 27477896
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995 Oct;16(4):557-64
pubmed: 8528172
Stem Cell Reports. 2014 Jun 06;3(1):60-72
pubmed: 25068122
Cell Transplant. 2018 Sep;27(9):1352-1367
pubmed: 30095002
Sci Rep. 2016 May 23;6:26463
pubmed: 27212469
Front Immunol. 2019 Jul 31;10:1645
pubmed: 31417542
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47559
pubmed: 23133515
Front Immunol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1627
pubmed: 31379832
Front Immunol. 2018 Dec 04;9:2837
pubmed: 30564236