Sentinel lymph node biopsy for high-thickness cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
/ diagnosis
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lymphatic Metastasis
/ diagnosis
Male
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ epidemiology
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Skin
/ pathology
Skin Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Dermatologic surgery
Oncology
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
Squamous cell carcinoma
Journal
Archives of dermatological research
ISSN: 1432-069X
Titre abrégé: Arch Dermatol Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8000462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
14
09
2019
accepted:
27
04
2020
revised:
19
04
2020
pubmed:
10
5
2020
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
10
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Squamous cell carcinomas are among the most common skin tumors and show a risk of metastasis depending on various factors such as tumor thickness, localization, histological subtype and immune status of the patient. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) SLNB represents a possibility for assessing the locoregional lymph node status. In this study, the role of the SLNB in lymph node status and survival was analyzed. Retrospectively, 720 patients with high-risk squamous cell carcinoma (tumor thickness > 5 mm) were examined. 150 patients agreed to SLNB, 570 patients did not undergo histologic confirmation of lymph node status and were included directly in follow-up. In 101 patients, a sentinel lymph node was successfully marked and extirpated, followed by regular follow-up examinations.A total of 11.11% of the patients showed lymph node metastasis in the course of their treatment, with no difference in the proportion of patients in the SLNB group (11.9%) and the observation group (11.4%) (p = 0.873). The proportion of distant metastasis also did not differ between the groups (p = 0.898). In 3.96% of the patients in the SLNB group, a metastasis was found in the sentinel lymph node. Tumor-specific death was observed in 7.14% of the patients in the SLNB group and 4.74% in the observation group (p = 0.269). Although SLNB is a principally suitable method for determining lymph node status, the available data do not provide any benefit regarding further metastasis or tumor-specific survival.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32385689
doi: 10.1007/s00403-020-02082-1
pii: 10.1007/s00403-020-02082-1
pmc: PMC7864829
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119-126Références
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Nov;67(5):829-35
pubmed: 22285618
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Apr;111:107-115
pubmed: 30849684
JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Jan;150(1):19-24
pubmed: 24226651
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Jan 1;154(1):101
pubmed: 29141074
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;22(12):4073-80
pubmed: 25712801
Eur J Dermatol. 2011 May-Jun;21(3):354-8
pubmed: 21680279
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Dec;34(12):2154-9
pubmed: 17943283
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012 Jul;10(7):457-71; quiz 472
pubmed: 22726597
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1996 Jan;5(1):33-41
pubmed: 8789492
Hautarzt. 2013 Aug;64(8):558-66
pubmed: 23948781
Lancet Oncol. 2005 Nov;6(11):877-85
pubmed: 16257796
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Aug;81(2):548-557
pubmed: 30227190
Dermatol Surg. 2006 Nov;32(11):1309-21
pubmed: 17083582
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;41(2):197-200
pubmed: 25468745
Aging Dis. 2017 Oct 1;8(5):643-661
pubmed: 28966807
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Jul;73(1):127-37
pubmed: 26089049
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007 Apr;33(3):364-9
pubmed: 17129703
Acta Derm Venereol. 2013 Jul 6;93(4):417-21
pubmed: 23138613
Cancer. 1997 Mar 1;79(5):915-9
pubmed: 9041153
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2015 Sep;13(9):942-51
pubmed: 26882393
Lancet. 2010 Feb 20;375(9715):673-85
pubmed: 20171403
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Aug;9(8):713-20
pubmed: 18617440
Br J Dermatol. 2011 Nov;165(5):953-65
pubmed: 21729024
JAMA Dermatol. 2013 May;149(5):541-7
pubmed: 23677079
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2005 Feb;3(2):109-12
pubmed: 16351013
Cancer. 2006 Dec 1;107(11):2647-52
pubmed: 17063497
J Invest Dermatol. 2017 Sep;137(9):1860-1867
pubmed: 28487088
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2013 Jun;11 Suppl 3:37-45, 39-47
pubmed: 23734897
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008 Mar;6(3):198-203
pubmed: 18093216
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Apr;172(4):1029-36
pubmed: 25362868
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Apr;152(4):419-28
pubmed: 26762219
Ann Surg. 1996 Feb;223(2):217-24
pubmed: 8597518
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jun 10;173(11):1006-12
pubmed: 23699934
Eur Surg Res. 2010;44(3-4):204-8
pubmed: 20523053