Comparing distance-based methods of measuring plant density in an arid sparse scrubland: testing field and simulated sampling.

Astragalus albispinus Sirj. & Bornm Astragalus verus Olivier Density estimation Plotless methods Rangeland Spatial pattern

Journal

Environmental monitoring and assessment
ISSN: 1573-2959
Titre abrégé: Environ Monit Assess
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8508350

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 May 2020
Historique:
received: 02 08 2019
accepted: 29 04 2020
entrez: 10 5 2020
pubmed: 10 5 2020
medline: 3 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Plant density is an important indicator of rangeland monitoring and management. In this paper, we aimed at comparing distance-based methods of density measurement in field and in a simulated approach for two species of Astragalus verus Olivier and Astragalus albispinus Sirj. & Bornm with random and regular distribution pattern respectively. Then, we simulated a sampling scheme based on field measured statistics of the two species using Stochastic Geometry program and repeated the measurements using the same density methods. Moreover, the total individual plants of each species were counted in the sampling plots as the control method in Marjan rangelands of Iran during summer 2018. Results indicated that the best method for A. verus is nearest neighbor and point-centered quarter in field and simulated datasets in terms of both accuracy and precision respectively. For A. albispinus, the nearest neighbor and third closest individual were the best methods when compared with control in term of precision and accuracy in the field respectively and third closet individual in simulated dataset in terms of both accuracy and precision compared with control, respectively. The results reveal that there is no statistically significant difference between the nearest neighbor and point-centered quarter for A. verus and third closest individual and nearest neighbor for A. albispinus when field/simulated datasets are compared with each other and controls. Therefore, we recommend using these distance methods when this is a known species distribution pattern, basic number per unit, and dimensions of the unit as an alternative.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32385751
doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08329-8
pii: 10.1007/s10661-020-08329-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

343

Subventions

Organisme : Shahrekord University
ID : 97GRN1M1871

Auteurs

Hamid Jamali (H)

Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran.

Elham Ghehsareh Ardestani (E)

Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran. elham.ghehsareh@nres.sku.ac.ir.
Central Laboratory, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran. elham.ghehsareh@nres.sku.ac.ir.

Ataollah Ebrahimi (A)

Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran.

Fatemeh Pordel (F)

Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634141, Iran.

Articles similaires

Humans Female Case-Control Studies Adult Breast Diseases
India Carbon Sequestration Environmental Monitoring Carbon Biomass
Animals Cattle Alberta Deer Seasons
Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals

Classifications MeSH