Raltegravir versus efavirenz in antiretroviral-naive pregnant women living with HIV (NICHD P1081): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 4 trial.


Journal

The lancet. HIV
ISSN: 2352-3018
Titre abrégé: Lancet HIV
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101645355

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
received: 27 11 2019
revised: 26 01 2020
accepted: 31 01 2020
entrez: 11 5 2020
pubmed: 11 5 2020
medline: 1 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although antiretroviral regimens containing integrase inhibitors rapidly suppress HIV viral load in non-pregnant adults, few published data from randomised controlled trials have compared the safety and efficacy of any integrase inhibitor to efavirenz when initiated during pregnancy. We compared safety and efficacy of antiretroviral therapy with either raltegravir or efavirenz in late pregnancy. An open-label, randomised controlled trial was done at 19 hospitals and clinics in Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, and the USA. Antiretroviral-naive pregnant women (20-<37 weeks gestation) living with HIV were assigned to antiretroviral regimens containing either raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) or efavirenz (600 mg each night) plus lamivudine 150 mg and zidovudine 300 mg twice daily (or approved alternative backbone regimen), using a web-based, permuted-block randomisation stratified by gestational age and backbone regimen. The primary efficacy outcome was plasma HIV viral load below 200 copies per mL at (or near) delivery. The primary efficacy analysis included all women with a viral load measurement at (or near) delivery who had viral load of at least 200 copies per mL before treatment and no genotypic resistance to any study drugs; secondary analyses eliminated these exclusion criteria. The primary safety analyses included all women who received study drug, and their infants. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01618305. From Sep 5, 2013, to Dec 11, 2018, 408 women were enrolled (206 raltegravir, 202 efavirenz) and 394 delivered on-study (200 raltegravir, 194 efavirenz); 307 were included in the primary efficacy analysis (153 raltegravir, 154 efavirenz). 144 (94%) women in the raltegravir group and 129 (84%) in the efavirenz group met the primary efficacy outcome (absolute difference 10%, 95% CI 3-18; p=0·0015); the difference primarily occurred among women enrolling later in pregnancy (interaction p=0·040). Frequencies of severe or life-threatening adverse events were similar among mothers (30% in each group; 61 raltegravir, 59 efavirenz) and infants (25% in each group; 50 raltegravir, 48 efavirenz), with no treatment-related deaths. Our findings support major guidelines. The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is currently a preferred regimen for the prevention of perinatal HIV transmission with raltegravir recommended as a preferred or alternative integrase inhibitor for pregnant women living with HIV. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Although antiretroviral regimens containing integrase inhibitors rapidly suppress HIV viral load in non-pregnant adults, few published data from randomised controlled trials have compared the safety and efficacy of any integrase inhibitor to efavirenz when initiated during pregnancy. We compared safety and efficacy of antiretroviral therapy with either raltegravir or efavirenz in late pregnancy.
METHODS
An open-label, randomised controlled trial was done at 19 hospitals and clinics in Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, Tanzania, Thailand, and the USA. Antiretroviral-naive pregnant women (20-<37 weeks gestation) living with HIV were assigned to antiretroviral regimens containing either raltegravir (400 mg twice daily) or efavirenz (600 mg each night) plus lamivudine 150 mg and zidovudine 300 mg twice daily (or approved alternative backbone regimen), using a web-based, permuted-block randomisation stratified by gestational age and backbone regimen. The primary efficacy outcome was plasma HIV viral load below 200 copies per mL at (or near) delivery. The primary efficacy analysis included all women with a viral load measurement at (or near) delivery who had viral load of at least 200 copies per mL before treatment and no genotypic resistance to any study drugs; secondary analyses eliminated these exclusion criteria. The primary safety analyses included all women who received study drug, and their infants. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01618305.
FINDINGS
From Sep 5, 2013, to Dec 11, 2018, 408 women were enrolled (206 raltegravir, 202 efavirenz) and 394 delivered on-study (200 raltegravir, 194 efavirenz); 307 were included in the primary efficacy analysis (153 raltegravir, 154 efavirenz). 144 (94%) women in the raltegravir group and 129 (84%) in the efavirenz group met the primary efficacy outcome (absolute difference 10%, 95% CI 3-18; p=0·0015); the difference primarily occurred among women enrolling later in pregnancy (interaction p=0·040). Frequencies of severe or life-threatening adverse events were similar among mothers (30% in each group; 61 raltegravir, 59 efavirenz) and infants (25% in each group; 50 raltegravir, 48 efavirenz), with no treatment-related deaths.
INTERPRETATION
Our findings support major guidelines. The integrase inhibitor dolutegravir is currently a preferred regimen for the prevention of perinatal HIV transmission with raltegravir recommended as a preferred or alternative integrase inhibitor for pregnant women living with HIV.
FUNDING
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32386720
pii: S2352-3018(20)30038-2
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30038-2
pmc: PMC7323582
mid: NIHMS1593997
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Alkynes 0
Anti-HIV Agents 0
Benzoxazines 0
Cyclopropanes 0
HIV Integrase Inhibitors 0
Lamivudine 2T8Q726O95
Raltegravir Potassium 43Y000U234
Zidovudine 4B9XT59T7S
efavirenz JE6H2O27P8

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01618305']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase IV Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e322-e331

Subventions

Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275201800001C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068632
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R21 MH083308
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI069453
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068616
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI027757
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI106716
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : HHSN275201800001I
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Références

Int J STD AIDS. 2015 Nov;26(13):922-8
pubmed: 25504831
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Jul;6(7):e804-e810
pubmed: 29880310
Epidemiology. 2010 Jul;21 Suppl 4:S64-70
pubmed: 20386104
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016 Jun 1;72(2):153-61
pubmed: 27183177
Lancet. 2009 Sep 5;374(9692):796-806
pubmed: 19647866
HIV Med. 2019 Mar;20 Suppl 3:s2-s85
pubmed: 30869192
HIV Med. 2018 Apr;19(4):280-289
pubmed: 29336508
J Chronic Dis. 1974 Sep;27(7-8):365-75
pubmed: 4612056
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019 May;38(5):508-512
pubmed: 30985546
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):385.e1-7
pubmed: 26928154
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2368-79
pubmed: 22716975
BJOG. 2014 Nov;121(12):1501-8
pubmed: 24602102
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 20;16(9):e1002895
pubmed: 31539371
HIV Clin Trials. 2018 Jun;19(3):94-100
pubmed: 29629852
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Feb;53(2):176-85
pubmed: 20104119
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 1;61(11):1715-25
pubmed: 26197844
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Sep 1;61(5):809-16
pubmed: 25944344
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 24;14(4):e0216010
pubmed: 31017957
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012 Dec;26(12):714-7
pubmed: 23101466
AIDS. 2017 Oct 23;31(16):2235-2244
pubmed: 28991024

Auteurs

Esaú C João (EC)

Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Electronic address: esaujoao@gmail.com.

R Leavitt Morrison (RL)

Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

David E Shapiro (DE)

Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Nahida Chakhtoura (N)

Maternal and Pediatric Infectious Diseases Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Maria Isabel S Gouvèa (MIS)

Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Maria de Lourdes B Teixeira (M)

Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Trevon L Fuller (TL)

Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Blandina T Mmbaga (BT)

Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.

James S Ngocho (JS)

Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.

Boniface N Njau (BN)

Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Moshi, Tanzania.

Avy Violari (A)

Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johanesburg, South Africa.

Ruth Mathiba (R)

Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johanesburg, South Africa.

Zaakirah Essack (Z)

Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johanesburg, South Africa.

Jose Henrique S Pilotto (JHS)

Hospital Geral de Nova Iguaçu, Nova Iguaçu, Brazil.

Luis Felipe Moreira (LF)

Hospital Geral de Nova Iguaçu, Nova Iguaçu, Brazil.

Maria Jose Rolon (MJ)

Fundacion Huesped, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Pedro Cahn (P)

Fundacion Huesped, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Sinart Prommas (S)

Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Timothy R Cressey (TR)

PHPT/IRD 174, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University and Chiangrai Prachanukroh Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Kulkanya Chokephaibulkit (K)

Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Peerawong Werarak (P)

Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Lauren Laimon (L)

Westat, Rockville, MD, USA.

Roslyn Hennessy (R)

Westat, Rockville, MD, USA.

Lisa M Frenkel (LM)

University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.

Patricia Anthony (P)

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Brookie M Best (BM)

University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

George K Siberry (GK)

US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA.

Mark Mirochnick (M)

Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH