Dolutegravir versus efavirenz in women starting HIV therapy in late pregnancy (DolPHIN-2): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.


Journal

The lancet. HIV
ISSN: 2352-3018
Titre abrégé: Lancet HIV
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101645355

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
received: 06 08 2019
revised: 10 02 2020
accepted: 11 02 2020
entrez: 11 5 2020
pubmed: 11 5 2020
medline: 1 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Late initiation of HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) in pregnancy is associated with not achieving viral suppression before giving birth and increased mother-to-child transmission of HIV. We aimed to investigate virological suppression before giving birth with dolutegravir compared with efavirenz, when initiated during the third trimester. In this randomised, open-label trial, DolPHIN-2, we recruited pregnant women in South Africa and Uganda aged at least 18 years, with untreated but confirmed HIV infection and an estimated gestation of at least 28 weeks, initiating ART in third trimester. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to dolutegravir-based or efavirenz-based therapy. HIV viral load was measured 7 days and 28 days after antiretroviral initiation, at 36 weeks' gestation, and at the post-partum visit (0-14 days post partum). The primary efficacy outcome was a viral load of less than 50 copies per mL at the first post-partum visit, and the primary safety outcome was the occurrence of drug-related adverse events in mothers and infants until the post-partum visit. Longer-term follow-up of mothers and infants continues. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03249181. Between Jan 23, and Aug 15, 2018, we randomly assigned 268 mothers to dolutegravir (135) or efavirenz (133). All mothers and their infants were included in the safety analysis, and 250 mothers (125 in the dolutegravir group, 125 in the efavirenz group) and their infants in efficacy analyses, by intention-to-treat analyses. The median duration of maternal therapy at birth was 55 days (IQR 33-77). 89 (74%) of 120 in the dolutegravir group had viral loads less than 50 copies per mL, compared with 50 (43%) of 117 in the efavirenz group (risk ratio 1·64, 95% CI 1·31-2·06). 30 (22%) of 137 mothers in the dolutegravir group reported serious adverse events compared with 14 (11%) of 131 in the efavirenz group (p=0·013), particularly surrounding pregnancy and puerperium. We found no differences in births less than 37 weeks and less than 34 weeks gestation (16·4% vs 3·3%, across both groups). Three stillbirths in the dolutegravir group and one in the efavirenz group were considered unrelated to treatment. Three infant HIV infections were detected, all in the dolutegravir group, and were considered likely to be in-utero transmissions. Our data support the revision to WHO guidelines recommending the transition to dolutegravir in first-line ART for all adults, regardless of pregnancy or child-bearing potential. Unitaid.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Late initiation of HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) in pregnancy is associated with not achieving viral suppression before giving birth and increased mother-to-child transmission of HIV. We aimed to investigate virological suppression before giving birth with dolutegravir compared with efavirenz, when initiated during the third trimester.
METHODS
In this randomised, open-label trial, DolPHIN-2, we recruited pregnant women in South Africa and Uganda aged at least 18 years, with untreated but confirmed HIV infection and an estimated gestation of at least 28 weeks, initiating ART in third trimester. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to dolutegravir-based or efavirenz-based therapy. HIV viral load was measured 7 days and 28 days after antiretroviral initiation, at 36 weeks' gestation, and at the post-partum visit (0-14 days post partum). The primary efficacy outcome was a viral load of less than 50 copies per mL at the first post-partum visit, and the primary safety outcome was the occurrence of drug-related adverse events in mothers and infants until the post-partum visit. Longer-term follow-up of mothers and infants continues. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03249181.
FINDINGS
Between Jan 23, and Aug 15, 2018, we randomly assigned 268 mothers to dolutegravir (135) or efavirenz (133). All mothers and their infants were included in the safety analysis, and 250 mothers (125 in the dolutegravir group, 125 in the efavirenz group) and their infants in efficacy analyses, by intention-to-treat analyses. The median duration of maternal therapy at birth was 55 days (IQR 33-77). 89 (74%) of 120 in the dolutegravir group had viral loads less than 50 copies per mL, compared with 50 (43%) of 117 in the efavirenz group (risk ratio 1·64, 95% CI 1·31-2·06). 30 (22%) of 137 mothers in the dolutegravir group reported serious adverse events compared with 14 (11%) of 131 in the efavirenz group (p=0·013), particularly surrounding pregnancy and puerperium. We found no differences in births less than 37 weeks and less than 34 weeks gestation (16·4% vs 3·3%, across both groups). Three stillbirths in the dolutegravir group and one in the efavirenz group were considered unrelated to treatment. Three infant HIV infections were detected, all in the dolutegravir group, and were considered likely to be in-utero transmissions.
INTERPRETATION
Our data support the revision to WHO guidelines recommending the transition to dolutegravir in first-line ART for all adults, regardless of pregnancy or child-bearing potential.
FUNDING
Unitaid.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32386721
pii: S2352-3018(20)30050-3
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(20)30050-3
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Alkynes 0
Anti-HIV Agents 0
Benzoxazines 0
Cyclopropanes 0
HIV Integrase Inhibitors 0
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring 0
Oxazines 0
Piperazines 0
Pyridones 0
dolutegravir DKO1W9H7M1
efavirenz JE6H2O27P8

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03249181']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e332-e339

Subventions

Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI122301
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Kenneth Kintu (K)

Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Thokozile R Malaba (TR)

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Jesca Nakibuka (J)

Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Christiana Papamichael (C)

Tropical Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Angela Colbers (A)

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Kelly Byrne (K)

Tropical Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Kay Seden (K)

Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Eva Maria Hodel (EM)

Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Tao Chen (T)

Tropical Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Adelline Twimukye (A)

Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Josaphat Byamugisha (J)

Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Helen Reynolds (H)

Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.

Victoria Watson (V)

Tropical Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

David Burger (D)

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Duolao Wang (D)

Tropical Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Catriona Waitt (C)

Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.

Miriam Taegtmeyer (M)

International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Catherine Orrell (C)

School of Public Health & Family Medicine, and Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, Department of Medicine, Institute of Infectious Diseases & Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Mohammed Lamorde (M)

Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Landon Myer (L)

Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Centre for Infectious Diseases Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Saye Khoo (S)

Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: khoo@liverpool.ac.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH