Benefit of a nurse-led telephone-based intervention prior to the first urogynecology outpatient visit: a randomized-controlled trial.
Nurse-led interview
Overactive bladder
Pelvic floor disorders
Pelvic organ prolapse
Referral and consultation
Telephone interview
Journal
International urogynecology journal
ISSN: 1433-3023
Titre abrégé: Int Urogynecol J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101567041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2021
06 2021
Historique:
received:
17
01
2020
accepted:
13
04
2020
pubmed:
11
5
2020
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
11
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Triage has become a valid tool to reduce workload during the first consultation in a specialized clinic. A nurse-led telephone intervention prior to the first urogynecologic visit reduces visit duration and increases patients' and physicians' satisfaction. All patients scheduled for their very first visit were recruited. They were randomized into an intervention group (prior contact by a specialized urogynecology nurse) and a control group (no contact). The intervention included a questionnaire about history and symptoms. Patients were prompted to complete a bladder diary. Primary outcome was duration of the consultation; secondary outcomes were patients' and physicians' satisfaction with the intervention. Fifty-five patients were allocated to the intervention group and 53 to the control group with no difference regarding age, BMI, parity, menopausal status and primary diagnosis. Mean duration of the telephone call was 10.8 min (SD 4.4). The consultation was significantly shorter in the intervention group than in the control group (mean difference: 4 min and 8 s, p = 0.017). In the intervention group, 79% of the patients found the consultation quality "excellent," 86% would return, and 77% would recommend our clinic to a relative or friend compared with 68%, 67% and 66%, respectively, in the control group. Physicians were "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with the patient preparation. A nurse-led intervention reduces the duration of the first uroynecologic consultation and is associated with high patient and physician satisfaction. Further research should evaluate whether it also decreases the number of follow-up visits and further referrals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32388632
doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04318-0
pii: 10.1007/s00192-020-04318-0
pmc: PMC8203547
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1489-1495Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
J Immigr Minor Health. 2019 Oct;21(5):965-970
pubmed: 30374856
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Dec;68(12):2610-21
pubmed: 22676805
J Emerg Nurs. 1999 Dec;25(6):468-73
pubmed: 10579766
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 May;20(5):390-6
pubmed: 21262792
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 9;17(1):706
pubmed: 29121920
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2012 Mar;137(9):419-24
pubmed: 22354796
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Feb;19(13):1-212, vii-viii
pubmed: 25690266
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD004180
pubmed: 15495083
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Mar;66(644):e214-8
pubmed: 26917660
Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233-7
pubmed: 10259963
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Jun;59(6):615-21
pubmed: 16713524
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Aug;20(8):913-7
pubmed: 19475330