Intertwined mechanisms define transport of anti-ICAM nanocarriers across the endothelium and brain delivery of a therapeutic enzyme.
Blood-brain barrier
ICAM-1-targeted nanocarriers
Lysosomal vs. transcytosis destinations
Receptor-mediated transport
Targeting valency
Journal
Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society
ISSN: 1873-4995
Titre abrégé: J Control Release
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8607908
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 08 2020
10 08 2020
Historique:
received:
04
09
2019
revised:
27
04
2020
accepted:
04
05
2020
pubmed:
12
5
2020
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
12
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The interaction of drug delivery systems with tissues is key for their application. An example is drug carriers targeted to endothelial barriers, which can be transported to intra-endothelial compartments (lysosomes) or transcellularly released at the tissue side (transcytosis). Although carrier targeting valency influences this process, the mechanism is unknown. We studied this using polymer nanocarriers (NCs) targeted to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), an endothelial-surface glycoprotein whose expression is increased in pathologies characterized by inflammation. A bell-shaped relationship was found between NC targeting valency and the rate of transcytosis, where high and low NC valencies rendered less efficient transcytosis rates than an intermediate valency formulation. In contrast, an inverted bell-shape relationship was found for NC valency and lysosomal trafficking rates. Data suggested a model where NC valency plays an opposing role in the two sub-processes involved in transcytosis: NC binding-uptake depended directly on valency and exocytosis-detachment was inversely related to this parameter. This is because the greater the avidity of the NC-receptor interaction the more efficient uptake becomes, but NC-receptor detachment post-transport is more compromised. Cleavage of the receptor at the basolateral side of endothelial cells facilitated NC transcytosis, likely by helping NC detachment post-transport. Since transcytosis encompasses both sets of events, the full process finds an optimum at the intersection of these inverted relationships, explaining the bell-shaped behavior. NCs also trafficked to lysosomes from the apical side and, additionally, from the basolateral side in the case of high valency NCs which are slower at detaching from the receptor. This explains the opposite behavior of NC valency for transcytosis vs. lysosomal transport. Anti-ICAM NCs were verified to traffic into the brain after intravenous injection in mice, and both cellular and in vivo data showed that intermediate valency NCs resulted in higher delivery of a therapeutic enzyme, acid sphingomyelinase, required for types A and B Niemann-Pick disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32389778
pii: S0168-3659(20)30284-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.05.009
pmc: PMC7720842
mid: NIHMS1596978
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drug Carriers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181-193Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : F31 HL128121
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL098416
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Pharmaceutics. 2014 Nov 17;6(4):557-83
pubmed: 25407801
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2007 Oct;30(5):654-63
pubmed: 17632693
Oncogene. 2002 Aug 8;21(34):5213-23
pubmed: 12149643
Mol Ther. 2017 Jul 5;25(7):1686-1696
pubmed: 28606376
J Immunol. 1998 Mar 15;160(6):2967-73
pubmed: 9510201
Curr Med Chem. 2014;21(36):4100-31
pubmed: 25139519
Nanomedicine. 2012 Jul;8(5):731-9
pubmed: 21906578
Pharm Res. 2015 Apr;32(4):1264-78
pubmed: 25319100
Nat Nanotechnol. 2007 Apr;2(4):249-55
pubmed: 18654271
Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(10):1422-49
pubmed: 23789948
Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(12):1295-312
pubmed: 15134482
J Drug Deliv. 2011;2011:160967
pubmed: 21490746
NeuroRx. 2005 Jan;2(1):151-61
pubmed: 15717066
Neuron. 2014 Jan 8;81(1):49-60
pubmed: 24411731
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2013 May;36(3):467-77
pubmed: 22968581
Adv Funct Mater. 2016 May 24;26(20):3382-3393
pubmed: 27375374
Mol Pharm. 2010 Oct 4;7(5):1569-75
pubmed: 20666515
Pharm Res. 2014 Jul;31(7):1855-66
pubmed: 24558007
Mol Pharm. 2012 Sep 4;9(9):2380-402
pubmed: 22844998
Cancer Res. 1995 Jun 15;55(12):2548-55
pubmed: 7780967
Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015 Feb;10(2):141-55
pubmed: 25388782
Blood. 2005 Jan 15;105(2):650-8
pubmed: 15367437
Sci Transl Med. 2011 May 25;3(84):84ra44
pubmed: 21613623
J Control Release. 2012 Aug 20;162(1):37-44
pubmed: 22705460
Bioeng Transl Med. 2017 Mar;2(1):109-119
pubmed: 28713860
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2008 Dec;5(12):1283-300
pubmed: 19040392
ACS Nano. 2013 Mar 26;7(3):2461-9
pubmed: 23383962
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2010 Jun;293(6):925-37
pubmed: 20503387
Blood. 2001 Aug 1;98(3):688-95
pubmed: 11468168
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012 Nov;32(11):1959-72
pubmed: 22929442
Mol Pharm. 2015 Nov 2;12(11):4137-45
pubmed: 26440359
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006 Jun;317(3):1161-9
pubmed: 16505161
J Control Release. 2011 Feb 10;149(3):323-31
pubmed: 21047542
Mol Pharm. 2014 Dec 1;11(12):4350-62
pubmed: 25301142
Cell. 1987 Dec 4;51(5):813-9
pubmed: 3315233
Langmuir. 2012 Jan 24;28(3):1765-74
pubmed: 22181558
Nanomedicine (Lond). 2014 Feb;9(2):313-30
pubmed: 24552563
Mol Neurobiol. 2016 Dec;53(10):7237-7253
pubmed: 26687231
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012 May;32(5):1178-85
pubmed: 22328778
J Pharm Sci. 2011 Mar;100(3):1045-56
pubmed: 20922813
Blood. 2005 Jul 15;106(2):584-92
pubmed: 15811956
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2012 Jun 1;2(3):169-86
pubmed: 24688886
J Cell Sci. 2003 Apr 15;116(Pt 8):1599-609
pubmed: 12640043
Methods Mol Biol. 2004;283:21-36
pubmed: 15197300
Mol Ther. 2006 Jan;13(1):135-41
pubmed: 16153895
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Apr;80(8):2258-62
pubmed: 6300903
J Control Release. 2011 Feb 28;150(1):37-44
pubmed: 21047540
Diabetes. 2007 Sep;56(9):2380-7
pubmed: 17536065
Nat Biotechnol. 2007 Mar;25(3):327-37
pubmed: 17334358
J Exp Med. 2014 Feb 10;211(2):233-44
pubmed: 24470444
J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2014 Feb;10(2):345-54
pubmed: 24738342
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006 May;290(5):L809-17
pubmed: 16299052
J Control Release. 2012 Dec 10;164(2):125-37
pubmed: 22709588
ACS Nano. 2013 Apr 23;7(4):2935-47
pubmed: 23421406
J Control Release. 2014 Aug 28;188:87-98
pubmed: 24933603
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016 Apr;15(4):275-92
pubmed: 26794270
Biomacromolecules. 2016 Oct 10;17(10):3127-3137
pubmed: 27585187
J Neurochem. 2007 Dec;103(5):1730-40
pubmed: 17953660
Immunity. 2007 Jun;26(6):784-97
pubmed: 17570692
Pharm Res. 2009 Jan;26(1):232-4
pubmed: 18923811
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 30;9(4):e96340
pubmed: 24788759
ACS Nano. 2013 Mar 26;7(3):1961-73
pubmed: 23402533
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 21;110(21):8662-7
pubmed: 23650374
Mol Ther. 2008 Aug;16(8):1450-8
pubmed: 18560419
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008 May;325(2):400-8
pubmed: 18287213