Protecting biodiversity and economic returns in resource-rich tropical forests.

Amazon Ecuador biodiversity fossil fuels spatial conservation prioritisation trade-offs

Journal

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
ISSN: 1523-1739
Titre abrégé: Conserv Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9882301

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 May 2020
Historique:
received: 20 12 2019
revised: 27 03 2020
accepted: 06 05 2020
pubmed: 12 5 2020
medline: 12 5 2020
entrez: 12 5 2020
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In pursuit of socioeconomic development, many countries are expanding oil and mineral extraction into tropical forests. These activities seed access to remote, biologically rich areas, thereby endangering global biodiversity. Here we demonstrate that conservation solutions that effectively balance the protection of biodiversity and economic revenues are possible in biologically valuable regions. Using spatial data on oil profits and predicted species and ecosystem extents, we optimise the protection of 741 terrestrial species and 20 ecosystems of the Ecuadorian Amazon, across a range of opportunity costs (i.e. sacrifices of extractive profit). For such an optimisation, giving up 5% of a year's oil profits (US$ 221 million) allows for a protected area network that retains of an average of 65% of the extent of each species/ecosystem. This performance far exceeds that of the network produced by simple land area optimisation which requires a sacrifice of approximately 40% of annual oil profits (US$ 1.7 billion), and uses only marginally less land, to achieve equivalent levels of ecological protection. Applying spatial statistics to remotely sensed, historic deforestation data, we further focus the optimisation to areas most threatened by imminent forest loss. We identify Emergency Conservation Targets: areas that are essential to a cost-effective conservation reserve network and at imminent risk of destruction, thus requiring urgent and effective protection. Governments should employ the methods presented here when considering extractive led development options, to responsibly manage the associated ecological-economic trade-offs and protect natural capital. Article Impact Statement: Governments controlling resource extraction from tropical forests can arrange production and conservation to retain biodiversity and profits. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32390229
doi: 10.1111/cobi.13534
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

James G C Ball (JGC)

Centre for Environmental Policy, Weeks Building, 16-18 Princes Gardens, London, SW7 1NE, UK.
School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Current: Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.

Mark A Burgman (MA)

Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, Weeks Building, 16-18 Princes Gardens, London, SW7 1NE, UK.

Elizabeth D Goldman (ED)

World Resources Institute, 10 G St NE #800, Washington, DC 20002, United States.

Janeth Lessmann (J)

Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Chile.

Classifications MeSH