Quantifying and Describing the Natural History and Costs of Alzheimer's Disease and Effects of Hypothetical Interventions.
Alzheimer’s disease
cost analysis
cost effectiveness
costs
dementia
disease-modifying treatment
economics
Journal
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD
ISSN: 1875-8908
Titre abrégé: J Alzheimers Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9814863
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
pubmed:
12
5
2020
medline:
11
5
2021
entrez:
12
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A long-term horizon is necessary when the socioeconomic consequences and the potential effects of interventions in Alzheimer's disease (AD) are estimated. To illustrate the potential societal costs of AD across the disease continuum and to illustrate the potential cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical intervention with disease modifying treatment (DMT). Based on the Swedish dementia registry, a Markov model was used to simulate a virtual cohort of 100,000 people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD (AD-MCI) in Sweden for 40 years starting at the age of 60. A simulated hypothetical intervention assumed a 25% reduction in progression rate during AD-MCI and mild AD-dementia. A comprehensive set of sensitivity analyses was included. The cumulative risk to develop dementia was 96%. The mean simulated survival was 19.0 years. The net present value for a person year with dementia was 252,843 SEK (about 29,500 US$). The cost effectiveness model illustrated how the hypothetical scenario of a 25% reduction in progression to AD-dementia would require 41 AD-MCI patients to be treated to prevent one case of AD-dementia (2,447 avoided AD-dementia cases of 100,000 with AD-MCI). Most scenarios illustrated hypothetical cost effectiveness (based on a willingness to pay level of 600,000 SEK (70,000 US$) per gained QALY), but not cost savings. Lifetime societal costs of AD are substantial. A future DMT may be potentially cost-effective given assumed treatment effects and costs, but cost savings are unlikely.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A long-term horizon is necessary when the socioeconomic consequences and the potential effects of interventions in Alzheimer's disease (AD) are estimated.
OBJECTIVES
To illustrate the potential societal costs of AD across the disease continuum and to illustrate the potential cost-effectiveness of a hypothetical intervention with disease modifying treatment (DMT).
METHODS
Based on the Swedish dementia registry, a Markov model was used to simulate a virtual cohort of 100,000 people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD (AD-MCI) in Sweden for 40 years starting at the age of 60. A simulated hypothetical intervention assumed a 25% reduction in progression rate during AD-MCI and mild AD-dementia. A comprehensive set of sensitivity analyses was included.
RESULTS
The cumulative risk to develop dementia was 96%. The mean simulated survival was 19.0 years. The net present value for a person year with dementia was 252,843 SEK (about 29,500 US$). The cost effectiveness model illustrated how the hypothetical scenario of a 25% reduction in progression to AD-dementia would require 41 AD-MCI patients to be treated to prevent one case of AD-dementia (2,447 avoided AD-dementia cases of 100,000 with AD-MCI). Most scenarios illustrated hypothetical cost effectiveness (based on a willingness to pay level of 600,000 SEK (70,000 US$) per gained QALY), but not cost savings.
DISCUSSION
Lifetime societal costs of AD are substantial. A future DMT may be potentially cost-effective given assumed treatment effects and costs, but cost savings are unlikely.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32390617
pii: JAD191055
doi: 10.3233/JAD-191055
pmc: PMC7369101
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
891-902Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Mar;12(3):225-32
pubmed: 26900132
Alzheimers Dement. 2014 Nov;10(6):844-52
pubmed: 24798886
Med Clin North Am. 2013 May;97(3):363-8
pubmed: 23642575
Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Jan;13(1):1-7
pubmed: 27583652
Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Mar;12(3):292-323
pubmed: 27012484
Alzheimers Dement. 2020 May;16(5):789-796
pubmed: 32202077
Brain. 2015 May;138(Pt 5):1327-38
pubmed: 25693589
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Aug;11(8):896-905
pubmed: 26071009
J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26(4):735-44
pubmed: 21709377
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Aug;13(8):788-94
pubmed: 25030513
Health Policy. 1991 Jun;18(1):37-48
pubmed: 10112300
J Intern Med. 2014 Mar;275(3):304-16
pubmed: 24605810
Alzheimers Dement. 2018 Apr;14(4):535-562
pubmed: 29653606
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2010 Jun;7(4):358-67
pubmed: 19939223
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2013 Feb;10(2):207-16
pubmed: 23036018
Int Psychogeriatr. 2004 Jun;16(2):129-40
pubmed: 15318760
Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2003;179:94-9
pubmed: 12603255
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):270-9
pubmed: 21514249
Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2019 Feb 27;2019:4942562
pubmed: 30937189
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;27(11):1112-7
pubmed: 22298311
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;41(2):467-77
pubmed: 24625796
Lancet Neurol. 2003 Jan;2(1):15-21
pubmed: 12849297
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Nov;9(11):1118-27
pubmed: 20934914
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):614-29
pubmed: 24849862
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;22(7):649-55
pubmed: 17136704
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016 Nov 18;8(1):59
pubmed: 27986093
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Apr;119(4):252-65
pubmed: 19236314
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(5):455-532
pubmed: 26987701
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 19;10(2):e0116538
pubmed: 25695768
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9
pubmed: 21514250
Qual Life Res. 2001;10(7):621-35
pubmed: 11822795
Qual Life Res. 2014 Mar;23(2):431-42
pubmed: 23975375
Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):280-92
pubmed: 21514248