Why is active travel more satisfying than motorized travel? Evidence from Dublin.

Environmental transport policy Subjective well-being Travel satisfaction

Journal

Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice
ISSN: 0965-8564
Titre abrégé: Transp Res Part A Policy Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101603981

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
received: 07 08 2019
revised: 04 02 2020
accepted: 08 04 2020
entrez: 12 5 2020
pubmed: 12 5 2020
medline: 12 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Some trips are better than others, and more and more studies find that active travel (walking and cycling) is more satisfying than motorized forms of travel (using the car or public transport). Why is this the case? Using data on travel satisfaction from 4134 commutes to a large University campus in Dublin, Ireland, this paper replicates the differences in travel satisfaction between active and motorized travel. We attribute these differences in large part to the duration of the trip. Subjective trip characteristics, such as safety and convenience, also play important roles. The trip duration explains rush-hour effects as well as why people starting from less affluent and more difficult-to-reach places are less satisfied with their trips. Longer-term policy options suggested by these results include infrastructure developments and spatial development strategies. A shorter-term initiative would be to delay university schedules in the morning to avoid low travel satisfaction during the slow rush-hour period and simultaneously ease pressure on the transport network at peak times.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32390693
doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.04.007
pii: S0965-8564(20)30562-0
pmc: PMC7200371
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

318-333

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Références

Scand J Psychol. 2002 Feb;43(1):19-31
pubmed: 11885757
Soc Indic Res. 2013 Mar;111(1):255-263
pubmed: 23378683
Prev Med. 2014 Dec;69:296-303
pubmed: 25152507
Soc Cogn. 2008 Oct 1;26(5):621-646
pubmed: 20198128
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):71-85
pubmed: 26151920
Travel Behav Soc. 2016 Sep;5:5-13
pubmed: 27231669
Am Econ Rev. 2012 Aug;102(5):2083-2110
pubmed: 23275649
Prev Med. 2013 Aug;57(2):135-9
pubmed: 23618913
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32
pubmed: 18509902
Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1776-80
pubmed: 15576620

Auteurs

Leonhard K Lades (LK)

UCD Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
UCD Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
EnvEcon, 11 Priory Office Park, Blackrock, Co., Dublin, Ireland.

Andrew Kelly (A)

EnvEcon, 11 Priory Office Park, Blackrock, Co., Dublin, Ireland.

Luke Kelleher (L)

UCD Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Classifications MeSH