The Reliability and Validity of a Novel Sport-Specific Balance Test to Differentiate Performance Levels in Elite Curling Players.
Postural control
core strength
flexibility
proprioception
skill acquisition
Journal
Journal of sports science & medicine
ISSN: 1303-2968
Titre abrégé: J Sports Sci Med
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101174629
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
received:
16
12
2019
accepted:
26
02
2020
entrez:
12
5
2020
pubmed:
12
5
2020
medline:
20
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Balance as a skill and task-specific capacity is considered an essential physical quality in curling, required for executing effective stone delivery. However, no testing protocols have been developed to test curling-specific balance in the delivery position. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to investigate the reliability, validity and usefulness of a newly-developed, curling-specific balance test (CSBT) which involved the delivery position. The secondary aim was to examine the differences between elite and sub-elite curlers for core strength and flexibility, which have previously been identified as important qualities in curling and determinants of balance. Twenty curling players (13 females aged 19 ± 3.1 years; 7 males aged 19.6 ± 2.3 years) from five Swedish super-league curling clubs were divided into two groups according to playing level: elite and sub-elite. Variables included body mass, body height, body mass index, age, playing experience, training frequency, plank test, sit and reach test, standing single-leg balance test (SLBT) and CSBT. The CSBT was executed on a multiaxial tilting balance plate while mimicking the curling delivery position (i.e., a deep lunge position with the front foot on the plate). The participants completed the CSBT on three separate occasions, with each test consisting of three, 20-s attempts. Both the relative and absolute reliability were good for the CSBT (ICC = 0.90; CV = 14.5%). The CSBT demonstrated good measurement usefulness, being sensitive to detect moderate changes that exceeded 0.5 times the test standard deviation. Construct validity of the CSBT was evidenced by the large discriminatory capacity to differentiate expertise level in curling players (t-test: 2.85, p < 0.01; large ES), irrespective of other physical capacities (e.g., flexibility and core strength). However, the elite and sub-elite players also differed in age, playing experience and training frequency. Content validity was confirmed by a weak correlation (r = 0.21; 95%CI: -0.26 to 0.60) between the CSBT and SLBT, which suggests that curling-specific and standing balance should be considered as independent and task-specific motor skills. In conclusion, the CSBT can be used as a reliable, valid and useful tool for the assessment of curling-specific balance performance. In addition, longer and more extensive involvement in curling training contributed to superior specific balance in elite curlers.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
337-346Informations de copyright
© Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.
Références
J Athl Train. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):42-6
pubmed: 17597942
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1457-64
pubmed: 21522077
Gait Posture. 2008 Jan;27(1):76-81
pubmed: 17337190
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Nov;21(4):1166-71
pubmed: 18076270
Gait Posture. 2012 Jul;36(3):372-7
pubmed: 22633015
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Aug;31(8):2278-2288
pubmed: 27662488
J Hum Kinet. 2014 Dec 30;44:29-40
pubmed: 25713663
J Sports Sci. 2019 Jul;37(14):1648-1654
pubmed: 30774001
J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Mar 01;12(1):88-96
pubmed: 24149730
J Sports Sci Med. 2018 May 14;17(2):174-180
pubmed: 29769817
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 May;23(5):1273-81
pubmed: 25682164
J Athl Train. 1998 Oct;33(4):319-22
pubmed: 16558528
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2008 Jun;193(2):101-16
pubmed: 18346210
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Aug;111(8):1619-23
pubmed: 21193925
Sports Med. 2000 Jul;30(1):1-15
pubmed: 10907753
Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Apr;27(8):2007-18
pubmed: 18412622
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2718-31
pubmed: 19910803
Percept Mot Skills. 2001 Jun;92(3 Pt 1):827-33
pubmed: 11453210
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Sep;22(5):1429-33
pubmed: 18714247
Gait Posture. 2006 Dec;24(4):459-66
pubmed: 16472525
J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Nov 19;18(4):623-635
pubmed: 31827346
Neurosci Lett. 2004 Mar 25;358(2):83-6
pubmed: 15026154
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Jul;32(7):1981-1992
pubmed: 29939949
Br J Sports Med. 2005 Oct;39(10):752-6
pubmed: 16183773
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Oct;32(10):2725-2729
pubmed: 29746382
J Athl Train. 2012 Nov-Dec;47(6):616-20
pubmed: 23182008
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012 Aug;22(4):471-7
pubmed: 21385217
Neurophysiol Clin. 2008 Dec;38(6):345-62
pubmed: 19026956
Curr Biol. 2010 Oct 12;20(19):1763-7
pubmed: 20850322
Res Sports Med. 2013;21(2):159-63
pubmed: 23541102
J Neurosci. 2005 Apr 27;25(17):4270-8
pubmed: 15858053
Front Physiol. 2018 May 15;9:506
pubmed: 29867552
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):231-40
pubmed: 15705040
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2007 Apr;189(4):347-58
pubmed: 17263693
J Athl Train. 2006 Apr-Jun;41(2):172-6
pubmed: 16791302
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 May;29(5):1240-7
pubmed: 25719917
Int J Sports Med. 2007 Dec;28(12):999-1005
pubmed: 17497570
Sports Med. 2011 Mar 1;41(3):221-32
pubmed: 21395364
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 07;10(8):e0134744
pubmed: 26252793
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Sep;82(3):1622-6
pubmed: 10482776
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Nov;28(11):3049-55
pubmed: 24796979
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Apr;112(4):1307-13
pubmed: 21789479