Cotton Duplicated Genes Produced by Polyploidy Show Significantly Elevated and Unbalanced Evolutionary Rates, Overwhelmingly Perturbing Gene Tree Topology.

cotton duplicated genes evolutionary rate gene collinearity orthologs phylogeny polyploidy

Journal

Frontiers in genetics
ISSN: 1664-8021
Titre abrégé: Front Genet
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560621

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 17 12 2019
accepted: 28 02 2020
entrez: 12 5 2020
pubmed: 12 5 2020
medline: 12 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A phylogenetic tree can be used to illustrate the evolutionary relationship between a group of genes, especially duplicated genes, which are sources of genetic innovation and are often a hotspot of research. However, duplicated genes may have complex phylogenetic topologies due to changes in their evolutionary rates. Here, by constructing phylogenetic trees using different methods, we evaluated the phylogenetic relationships of duplicated genes produced by polyploidization in cotton. We found that at least 83.2% of phylogenetic trees did not conform the expected topology. Moreover, cotton homologous gene copy number has little effect on the topology of duplicated genes. Compared with their cacao orthologs, elevated evolutionary rates of cotton genes are responsible for distorted tree topology. Furthermore, as to both branch and site models, we inferred that positive natural selection during the divergence of fiber-development-related MYB genes was likely, and found that the reconstructed tree topology may often overestimate natural selection, as compared to the inference with the expected trees. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of borrowing precious information from gene collinearity in tree construction and evaluation, and have evidence to alert the citation of thousands of previous reports of adaptivity and functional innovation of duplicated genes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32391043
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00239
pmc: PMC7190988
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

239

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Meng, Pan, Wang, Yu, Liu, Zhang, Wei, Guo and Wang.

Références

Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D1229-36
pubmed: 24203703
Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1;23(21):2947-8
pubmed: 17846036
Evolution. 2009 Jan;63(1):1-19
pubmed: 19146594
Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25
pubmed: 3447015
J Exp Bot. 2012 Sep;63(14):5061-77
pubmed: 22865910
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Mar 28;13(5):303-14
pubmed: 22456349
Genetics. 2000 May;155(1):431-49
pubmed: 10790415
Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Oct;13(5):555-6
pubmed: 9367129
Plant Cell. 2014 Jun 24;26(6):2420-2429
pubmed: 24963058
J Vis Exp. 2018 Aug 14;(138):
pubmed: 30175990
Nat Commun. 2014 May 23;5:3930
pubmed: 24852848
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1549:135-146
pubmed: 27975289
New Phytol. 2016 Feb;209(3):1252-63
pubmed: 26756535
Nature. 2007 Sep 27;449(7161):463-7
pubmed: 17721507
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1547-1549
pubmed: 29722887
Genetics. 2000 Jan;154(1):459-73
pubmed: 10629003
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Dec;22(12):2444-56
pubmed: 16120808
Science. 2000 Nov 10;290(5494):1151-5
pubmed: 11073452
J Mol Evol. 1981;17(6):368-76
pubmed: 7288891
Nat Plants. 2016 Aug 01;2:16115
pubmed: 27479829
Genome Res. 2002 Sep;12(9):1305-15
pubmed: 12213767
Plant Physiol. 2017 May;174(1):284-300
pubmed: 28325848
J Mol Evol. 1994 Sep;39(3):306-14
pubmed: 7932792
New Phytol. 2015 Jan;205(1):378-89
pubmed: 25138576
Nat Genet. 2011 Aug 28;43(10):1035-9
pubmed: 21873998
Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Sep;3(5):418-26
pubmed: 3444411
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Nov;17(6):1385-1392
pubmed: 28374552
Science. 2014 Aug 22;345(6199):950-3
pubmed: 25146293
Nature. 2012 May 30;485(7400):635-41
pubmed: 22660326
Nature. 2011 May 5;473(7345):97-100
pubmed: 21478875
BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Aug 19;5:113
pubmed: 15318951
Nature. 2012 Dec 20;492(7429):423-7
pubmed: 23257886
Plant Physiol. 2019 Jan;179(1):209-219
pubmed: 30385647
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Oct;10(10):725-32
pubmed: 19652647
Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673-80
pubmed: 7984417
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 15;10:421
pubmed: 20003500
Syst Biol. 2010 May;59(3):307-21
pubmed: 20525638

Auteurs

Fanbo Meng (F)

School of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.

Yuxin Pan (Y)

School of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.

Jinpeng Wang (J)

School of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.

Jigao Yu (J)

School of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.

Chao Liu (C)

School of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.

Zhikang Zhang (Z)

School of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.

Chendan Wei (C)

School of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.

He Guo (H)

School of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.

Xiyin Wang (X)

School of Life Sciences, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Institute for Genomics and Bio-Big-Data, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Classifications MeSH