Differentiating pregnancies near the uterotubal junction (angular, cornual, and interstitial): a review and recommendations.
Angular pregnancy
Cornual pregnancy
Early pregnancy ultrasound
Eccentric pregnancy
Ectopic pregnancy
Interstitial pregnancy
Tubal pregnancy
Uterotubal junction
Journal
Fertility research and practice
ISSN: 2054-7099
Titre abrégé: Fertil Res Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101671668
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
06
02
2020
accepted:
06
04
2020
entrez:
12
5
2020
pubmed:
12
5
2020
medline:
12
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Eccentrically located intracavitary pregnancies, which include pregnancies traditionally termed as cornual and/or angular, have long presented complex diagnostic and management challenges given their inherent relationship to interstitial ectopic pregnancies. This review uses the existing literature to discriminate among interstitial, cornual, and angular pregnancies. Current arguments propose the outright abandonment of the terms cornual and angular may be justified in favor of the singular term, eccentric pregnancy. Disparate definitions and diagnostic approaches have compromised the literature's ability to precisely describe prognosis and ideal management practices for each of these types of pregnancies. Standardizing the classification of these pregnancies near the uterotubal junction is important to unify conservative, yet safe and effective management strategies. We advocate the use of early first trimester ultrasound to correctly differentiate between eccentric pregnancy and interstitial ectopic pregnancy as current research suggests substantially better outcomes with correctly diagnosed and expectantly managed eccentric pregnancies than past investigations may have shown. The expectant management of eccentric pregnancies will often result in a healthy term pregnancy, while interstitial ectopic pregnancies inherently have a poor likelihood of progressing to viability. When the terms and diagnosis of cornual, angular, and interstitial pregnancy are indistinct, there is substantial risk of intrauterine pregnancies to be inappropriately managed as ectopic pregnancies. Until we standardize terms and criteria, it will remain difficult, if not impossible, to determine true risk for pregnancy loss, preterm labor, abnormal placentation, and uterine or uterotubal rupture. The development of best practice guidelines will require standardized terminology and diagnostic techniques.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32391161
doi: 10.1186/s40738-020-00077-0
pii: 77
pmc: PMC7199330
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
8Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):366-373
pubmed: 28697109
Fertil Steril. 1999 Aug;72(2):207-15
pubmed: 10438980
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004 Oct;30(5):377-9
pubmed: 15327452
JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):123-6
pubmed: 17651573
Fertil Steril. 2006 Dec;86(6):1764.e11-4
pubmed: 17094984
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jun;79(6):1044-9
pubmed: 1579304
Fertil Steril. 1992 Dec;58(6):1234-6
pubmed: 1281118
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Aug;39(8):627-634
pubmed: 28729096
J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Jun;34(6):951-62
pubmed: 26014313
AJP Rep. 2014 May;4(1):29-32
pubmed: 25032056
Hum Reprod. 2002 Dec;17(12):3224-30
pubmed: 12456628
J Reprod Med. 1989 Nov;34(11):928-9
pubmed: 2685291
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jan;202(1):15-29
pubmed: 20096253
Clin Imaging. 2014 Nov-Dec;38(6):763-70
pubmed: 25156020
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Dec;23(4):1177-93
pubmed: 7004702
J Reprod Med. 2005 Feb;50(2):141-4
pubmed: 15755053
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995 Jan 27;44(3):46-8
pubmed: 7823895
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 Feb;11(1):1
pubmed: 15104822
Case Rep Womens Health. 2018 Jun 20;19:e00068
pubmed: 30094196
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2015;42(5):698-700
pubmed: 26524831
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1997;24(2):92
pubmed: 9342472
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):223-6
pubmed: 7063730
Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Aug;58(2):167-75
pubmed: 7254728
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Aug;22(3):172-4
pubmed: 6216878
Hum Reprod Update. 1996 Nov-Dec;2(6):541-51
pubmed: 9111187
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1952 Feb;59(1):85-7
pubmed: 14908709
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jan;26(1):178-181
pubmed: 30107240
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Aug;52(4):387-90
pubmed: 22676439
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Apr;46(2):107-11
pubmed: 16638031
Radiology. 1993 Oct;189(1):83-7
pubmed: 8372223
Proc R Soc Med. 1964 Aug;57:707-9
pubmed: 14195866
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988 Dec;95(12):1321-3
pubmed: 2465022
Fertil Steril. 1993 Apr;59(4):924-5
pubmed: 7681415
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 10;369(15):1443-51
pubmed: 24106937
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;135(1):175-184
pubmed: 31809430