Comparison of mobile and clinical EEG sensors through resting state simultaneous data collection.

EEG Epilepsy Mobile health Simultaneous recording Time series Wearable sensor

Journal

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 04 12 2019
accepted: 24 03 2020
entrez: 12 5 2020
pubmed: 12 5 2020
medline: 12 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Development of mobile sensors brings new opportunities to medical research. In particular, mobile electroencephalography (EEG) devices can be potentially used in low cost screening for epilepsy and other neurological and psychiatric disorders. The necessary condition for such applications is thoughtful validation in the specific medical context. As part of validation and quality assurance, we developed a computer-based analysis pipeline, which aims to compare the EEG signal acquired by a mobile EEG device to the one collected by a medically approved clinical-grade EEG device. Both signals are recorded simultaneously during 30 min long sessions in resting state. The data are collected from 22 patients with epileptiform abnormalities in EEG. In order to compare two multichannel EEG signals with differently placed references and electrodes, a novel data processing pipeline is proposed. It allows deriving matching pairs of time series which are suitable for similarity assessment through Pearson correlation. The average correlation of 0.64 is achieved on a test dataset, which can be considered a promising result, taking the positions shift due to the simultaneous electrode placement into account.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32391200
doi: 10.7717/peerj.8969
pii: 8969
pmc: PMC7197399
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e8969

Informations de copyright

©2020 Kutafina et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Références

Epilepsy Behav. 2014 Mar;32:102-7
pubmed: 24531133
PeerJ. 2015 Apr 21;3:e907
pubmed: 25922794
Neurology. 2009 Sep 15;73(11):843-6
pubmed: 19752450
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 03;7:45567
pubmed: 28367974
Sensors (Basel). 2011;11(6):5819-34
pubmed: 22163929
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Oct 31;12:95
pubmed: 26520574
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2002 Apr;65(4 Pt 1):041903
pubmed: 12005869
Sensors (Basel). 2014 Jul 18;14(7):12847-70
pubmed: 25046013
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 30;11:150
pubmed: 28424600
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Feb;103(Pt A):106507
pubmed: 31645318
J Neural Eng. 2011 Apr;8(2):025008
pubmed: 21436526
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 30;11:341
pubmed: 28713253
Neuroimage. 2008 Jun;41(2):302-10
pubmed: 18424182
Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 May;121(5):686-93
pubmed: 20097606
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):930-8
pubmed: 19715762
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499

Auteurs

Ekaterina Kutafina (E)

Institute of Medical Informatics, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Faculty of Applied Mathematics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland.

Alexander Brenner (A)

Institute of Medical Informatics, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Yannic Titgemeyer (Y)

Institute of Medical Informatics, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Rainer Surges (R)

Department of Epileptology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Stephan Jonas (S)

Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.

Classifications MeSH