Qualities Important in the Selection of Chief Residents.

chief resident

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Apr 2020
Historique:
entrez: 12 5 2020
pubmed: 12 5 2020
medline: 12 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Background Chief resident selection occurs by numerous methods. Chief residents also fulfill multiple roles, requiring a broad skill set. However, there is little literature on which qualities various stakeholders value in chief resident selection. The objective of this study was to identify the qualities that residents and faculty believe are important for chief residents. Methods Following a literature review, educational experts conducted a multi-institutional survey that asked participants to name the qualities they felt were most important in chief residents and to rank-order a predefined list of 10 qualities. Associations were calculated between rank-order and participant age, gender, institutional position, and history of serving as a chief resident. Results The response rate for the survey was 43.9% (385/877). Leadership, organization, and communication skills were named by all participants among the most common responses. Residents additionally named approachability, advocacy, and listening skills among their most valued qualities, whereas faculty named strong clinical skills and integrity. Dependability and trustworthiness were the most valued qualities in the rank-order list, whereas strong clinical skills and self-reflection were the least valued. Females valued the ability to manage multiple demands more whereas males valued dependability more. The faculty valued strong clinical skills more than residents. Conclusion A variety of qualities are seen as being valuable in chief residents. Additional research is needed to understand what qualities are associated with effective chief resident performance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32391229
doi: 10.7759/cureus.7580
pmc: PMC7205358
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e7580

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020, Turner et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

West J Emerg Med. 2010 May;11(2):120-5
pubmed: 20823957
Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):425-30
pubmed: 25607939
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jul-Aug;75(4):257-62
pubmed: 8777020
Acad Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug;34(4):253-7
pubmed: 20576981
Acad Psychiatry. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):277-80
pubmed: 17626189
Acad Psychiatry. 2012 Sep 1;36(5):388-90
pubmed: 22983470
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Oct;72(5):262-5
pubmed: 8398015
Acad Psychiatry. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):270-6
pubmed: 17626188
Acad Psychiatry. 2009 Jan-Feb;33(1):56-9
pubmed: 19349446
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Mar;24(3):190-9
pubmed: 25658907
Med Teach. 2017 Mar;39(3):269-277
pubmed: 28019135
J Med Educ. 1988 Apr;63(4):333-5
pubmed: 3357188
Acad Psychiatry. 2013 Jan 1;37(1):18-22
pubmed: 23338866

Auteurs

Joseph Turner (J)

Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

Megan Litzau (M)

Emergency Medicine, Mercy Hospital, St. Louis, USA.

Josh Mugele (J)

Emergency Medicine, Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Gainesville, USA.

Katie Pettit (K)

Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

Elisa J Sarmiento (EJ)

Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

Aloysius Humbert (A)

Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

Classifications MeSH