Sex-dependent Regeneration Patterns in Mouse Submandibular Glands.
gender differences
materials science
regeneration
saliva
salivary physiology
Journal
The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society
ISSN: 1551-5044
Titre abrégé: J Histochem Cytochem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9815334
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2020
05 2020
Historique:
entrez:
12
5
2020
pubmed:
12
5
2020
medline:
15
12
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Our previous studies indicated that YIGSR-A99 peptides chemically conjugated to fibrin hydrogel (FH) and applied to wounded submandibular gland (SMG) in vivo, formed new organized salivary tissue, whereas wounded SMG treated with FH alone or in the absence of a scaffold showed disorganized collagen formation and poor tissue healing. While these studies indicated that damaged SMG grow and differentiate when treated with FH containing L1 peptide, they were performed only in female mice. However, there is a well-established sexual dimorphism present in mouse SMG (e.g., males develop well-differentiated granular convoluted tubules, but these structures are poorly developed in females) and little is known about how these sex differences influence wound healing events. Therefore, the goal of this study was to conduct comparative analyses of regeneration patterns in male and female mice using L
Identifiants
pubmed: 32391739
doi: 10.1369/0022155420922948
pmc: PMC7226622
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hydrogels
0
Fibrin
9001-31-4
Collagen
9007-34-5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
305-318Subventions
Organisme : NIDCR NIH HHS
ID : R01 DE022971
Pays : United States
Références
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Aug 6;7(3):353-60
pubmed: 27602236
Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:816460
pubmed: 26089604
Wound Repair Regen. 2007 Jan-Feb;15(1):80-6
pubmed: 17244323
J Endocrinol. 1989 Jun;121(3):501-6
pubmed: 2787828
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 2;12(11):e0187069
pubmed: 29095857
J Neurochem. 1975 Dec;25(6):843-51
pubmed: 1206401
Eur Cell Mater. 2018 Jul 25;36:15-29
pubmed: 30047980
Cells Tissues Organs. 2014;200(3-4):171-80
pubmed: 25824480
J Cell Physiol. 2018 Sep;233(9):6425-6440
pubmed: 29319160
Cell Res. 2013 Aug;23(8):984-5
pubmed: 23835480
Tissue Eng Part A. 2014 Jun;20(11-12):1632-42
pubmed: 24410370
Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1990 Aug;123(2):211-7
pubmed: 2220261
Expert Rev Mol Med. 2011 Jul 11;13:e23
pubmed: 21740602
Histochem J. 1999 Jan;31(1):19-28
pubmed: 10405819
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jun 19;19(6):
pubmed: 29921749
Endocrinology. 1974 Sep;95(3):776-82
pubmed: 4368688
Nat Rev Immunol. 2011 Oct 14;11(11):723-37
pubmed: 21997792
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013 Oct;33(10):1549-55
pubmed: 23801245
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2012 Feb;1(1):10-16
pubmed: 24527272
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2002 Apr;54(4):523-8
pubmed: 11999130
Eur J Morphol. 1998 Aug;36 Suppl:31-4
pubmed: 9825889
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Nov;36(10):1431-40
pubmed: 21855222
Carcinogenesis. 1985 Dec;6(12):1747-53
pubmed: 3877575
FEBS Open Bio. 2019 May;9(5):947-958
pubmed: 30998297
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2011 Dec;22(9):1005-11
pubmed: 22020130
Oral Dis. 2019 Mar;25(2):403-415
pubmed: 29383862
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1960 Mar 29;85:324-41
pubmed: 14416187
J Anat. 1990 Oct;172:115-27
pubmed: 2272897
An Bras Dermatol. 2016 Sep-Oct;91(5):614-620
pubmed: 27828635
Biol Sex Differ. 2015 Nov 03;6:19
pubmed: 26535108
Results Probl Cell Differ. 2017;62:353-364
pubmed: 28455716
Immunity. 2016 Mar 15;44(3):450-462
pubmed: 26982353
Anat Rec. 1999 Mar;254(3):408-17
pubmed: 10096673
Front Immunol. 2014 Oct 17;5:514
pubmed: 25368618
J Exp Med. 2010 Feb 15;207(2):345-52
pubmed: 20071503