Da Vinci Single-Port robot-assisted transanal mesorectal excision: a promising preclinical experience.
Da vinci SP
Rectal cancer
Robotic transanal surgery
Robotics
Single-port surgery
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME)
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2020
07 2020
Historique:
received:
23
09
2019
accepted:
10
02
2020
pubmed:
13
5
2020
medline:
25
5
2021
entrez:
13
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Robotic single-port platforms represent a viable option for advanced surgical procedures. This preclinical study investigated the dual-field, single-port, robot-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). In a male human cadaver, we employed the novel da Vinci® SP™ Surgical System, sequentially, to realize the transanal and abdominal parts of the taTME procedure. We evaluated the feasibility of the one-team approach. We showed that single-port access for the taTME was technically feasible with the current da Vinci® SP™ Surgical System in both surgical fields. The total console times were 189 min for the juxta-anal purse-string suture placement, partial intersphincteric resection, and bottom-up mesorectal dissection to where it meets the peritoneal reflection and 43 min for the abdominal procedure. A good quality specimen was achieved. The surgeon comfort was high during simulated surgery. The task load was highly acceptable (NASA-TLX global score: 35), even though it was the surgeon's first use of this platform. This preclinical study demonstrated that the robotic, single-port taTME was feasible and could be performed with the da Vinci® SP™ Surgical System, beginning at the level of the dentate line. Further simulations are necessary to confirm this promising approach.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32394173
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07444-4
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-07444-4
pmc: PMC7271049
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3232-3235Références
Cianci S, Rosati A, Rumolo V, Gueli Alletti S, Gallotta V, Turco LC, Corrado G, Vizzielli G, Fagotti F, Fanfani F, Scambia G, Uccella S (2019) Robotic single-port platform in general, urologic, and gynecologic surgeries: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05049-0
doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05049-0
pubmed: 31187247
Hirst A, Philippou Y, Blazeby J, Campbell B, Campbell M, Feinberg J, Rovers M, Blencowe N, Pennell C, Quinn T, Rogers W, Cook J, Kolias AG, Agha R, Dahm P, Sedrakyan A, McCulloch P (2019) No surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations. Ann Surg 269:211–220
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002794
Roodbeen SX, loConte A, Hirst A, Penna M, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ, McCulloch P, Hompes R (2019) Evolution of transanal total mesorectal excision according to the IDEAL framework. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol 1:e000004. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000004
doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000004
Hol JC, van Oostendorp SE, Tuynman JB, Sietses C (2019) Long-term oncological results after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma. Tech Coloproctol 23:903–911
doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02094-8
Wasmuth HH, Faerden AE, Myklebust TÅ, Pfeffer F, Norderval S, Riis R, Olsen OC, Lambrecht JR, Kørner H, Larsen SG, Norwegian TaTME Collaborative Group, on behalf of the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Group, Forsmo HM, Baekkelund O, Lavik S, Knapp JC, Sjo O, Rashid G (2020) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been suspended in Norway. Br J Surg 107:121–130
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11459
Lee L, de Lacy B, Gomez Ruiz M, Liberman AS, Albert MR, Monson JRT, Lacy A, Kim SH, Atallah SB (2018) A multicenter matched comparison of transanal and robotic total mesorectal excision for mid and low-rectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002862
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002862
pubmed: 30499795
pmcid: 6037551
Gomez Ruiz M (2019) Totally robotic taTME: experiences and challenges to date. In: Atallah S (ed) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). Springer, Dordrecht, pp 455–464
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11572-2_44
Kneist W (2019) Prerequisites for safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision. Zentralbl Chir 144:408–418
doi: 10.1055/a-0956-7065
https://www.keithv.com/software/nasatlx/nasatlx_german.html
Marks J, Ng S, Mak T (2017) Robotic transanal surgery (RTAS) with utilization of a next-generation single-port system: a cadaveric feasibility study. Tech Coloproctol 21:541–545
doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1655-3
Chiu PWY, Ng SSM, Au SKW (2019) Transcervical minimally invasive esophagectomy using da Vinci® SP™ Surgical System: a feasibility study in cadaveric model. Surg Endosc 33:1683–1686
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06628-3
Carmichael H, D'Andrea AP, Skancke M, Obias V, Sylla P (2019) Feasibility of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) using the Medrobotics Flex® System. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07019-y
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07019-y
pubmed: 31350608
Lee GI, Lee MR, Clanton T, Sutton E (2014) Park AE (2014) Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Surg Endosc 28:456–465
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3213-z
Atallah S, Parra-Davila E, Melani AGF (2019) Assessment of the Versius surgical robotic system for dual-field synchronous transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a preclinical model: will tomorrow's surgical robots promise newfound options? Tech Coloproctol 23:471–477
doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01992-1