Development of a computerized adaptive test to assess entrepreneurial personality.

Adults Computerized adaptive test Entrepreneurial personality Evaluation

Journal

Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS
ISSN: 0102-7972
Titre abrégé: Psicol Reflex Crit
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 9616730

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 May 2020
Historique:
received: 10 02 2020
accepted: 29 04 2020
entrez: 13 5 2020
pubmed: 13 5 2020
medline: 13 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Entrepreneurial behavior is of great importance nowadays owing to its significance in the generation of economic, social, personal, and cultural wellbeing. This behavior is influenced by cognitive and personality characteristics, as well as by socioeconomic and contextual factors. Entrepreneurial personality is made up of a set of psychological traits including self-efficacy, autonomy, innovation, internal locus of control, achievement motivation, optimism, stress tolerance, and risk-taking. The aim of this research is the development of a computerized adaptive test (CAT) to evaluate entrepreneurial personality. A bank of 120 items was created evaluating various aspects of the entrepreneurial personality. The items were calibrated with the Samejima Graded Response Model using a sample of 1170 participants (M The bank of items had an essentially unidimensional fit to the model. The CAT exhibited high accuracy for evaluating a wide range of θ scores, using a mean of 16 items with a very low standard error (M = 0.157). Relative validity evidence for the CAT was obtained with two additional tests of entrepreneurial personality (the Battery for the Assessment of the Enterprising Personality and the Measure of Enterpreneurial Tendencies and Abilities), with correlations of .908 and .657, respectively. The CAT developed has appropriate psychometric properties for the evaluation of entrepreneurial people.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Entrepreneurial behavior is of great importance nowadays owing to its significance in the generation of economic, social, personal, and cultural wellbeing. This behavior is influenced by cognitive and personality characteristics, as well as by socioeconomic and contextual factors. Entrepreneurial personality is made up of a set of psychological traits including self-efficacy, autonomy, innovation, internal locus of control, achievement motivation, optimism, stress tolerance, and risk-taking. The aim of this research is the development of a computerized adaptive test (CAT) to evaluate entrepreneurial personality.
METHOD METHODS
A bank of 120 items was created evaluating various aspects of the entrepreneurial personality. The items were calibrated with the Samejima Graded Response Model using a sample of 1170 participants (M
RESULTS RESULTS
The bank of items had an essentially unidimensional fit to the model. The CAT exhibited high accuracy for evaluating a wide range of θ scores, using a mean of 16 items with a very low standard error (M = 0.157). Relative validity evidence for the CAT was obtained with two additional tests of entrepreneurial personality (the Battery for the Assessment of the Enterprising Personality and the Measure of Enterpreneurial Tendencies and Abilities), with correlations of .908 and .657, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The CAT developed has appropriate psychometric properties for the evaluation of entrepreneurial people.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32394294
doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00144-x
pii: 10.1186/s41155-020-00144-x
pmc: PMC7214556
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

6

Subventions

Organisme : Gobierno del Principado de Asturias
ID : BP17-78
Organisme : Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España
ID : PSI2017-85724-P

Références

Qual Life Res. 2009 May;18(4):447-60
pubmed: 19294529
Psicothema. 2017 Aug;29(3):390-395
pubmed: 28693712
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 25;7:1842
pubmed: 27933015
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 29;9:2352
pubmed: 30555379
Psicothema. 2018 Nov;30(4):357-363
pubmed: 30353834
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2019 Sep 23;32(1):18
pubmed: 32026001
Psicothema. 2019 Feb;31(1):73-80
pubmed: 30664414
Span J Psychol. 2014 Feb 20;17:E60
pubmed: 26055899
Psicothema. 2016 Nov;28(4):471-478
pubmed: 27776618
Psicothema. 2014;26(4):545-53
pubmed: 25340904
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199924
pubmed: 29953517
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 03;8(9):e73201
pubmed: 24019907
Psicothema. 2019 Nov;31(4):450-457
pubmed: 31634091
Psicothema. 2018 May;30(2):149-158
pubmed: 29694314
Psicothema. 2016 Nov;28(4):465-470
pubmed: 27776617
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 22;10(6):e0129332
pubmed: 26098674
Psicothema. 2019 Feb;31(1):7-16
pubmed: 30664405
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 4;13(1):e0190228
pubmed: 29300735
Psychol Methods. 2009 Mar;14(1):6-23
pubmed: 19271845
Psychiatry Res. 2018 May;263:250-256
pubmed: 29625786
Front Psychol. 2018 Jun 14;9:951
pubmed: 29962985

Auteurs

Álvaro Postigo (Á)

Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijoo s/n, 33003, Oviedo, Spain. postigoalvaro@uniovi.es.

Marcelino Cuesta (M)

Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijoo s/n, 33003, Oviedo, Spain.

Ignacio Pedrosa (I)

Parque Científico Tecnológico (CTIC), Gijón, Spain.

José Muñiz (J)

Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijoo s/n, 33003, Oviedo, Spain.

Eduardo García-Cueto (E)

Department of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijoo s/n, 33003, Oviedo, Spain.

Classifications MeSH