Tactile Feedback in Closed-Loop Control of Myoelectric Hand Grasping: Conveying Information of Multiple Sensors Simultaneously via a Single Feedback Channel.
bone conduction
human-robot interaction
neuroprostheses
sensory feedback restoration
tactile feedback
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
10
09
2019
accepted:
23
03
2020
entrez:
13
5
2020
pubmed:
13
5
2020
medline:
13
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The appropriate sensory information feedback is important for the success of an object grasping and manipulation task. In many scenarios, the need arises for multiple feedback information to be conveyed to a prosthetic hand user simultaneously. The multiple sets of information may either (1) directly contribute to the performance of the grasping or object manipulation task, such as the feedback of the grasping force, or (2) simply form additional independent set(s) of information. In this paper, the efficacy of simultaneously conveying two independent sets of sensor information (the grasp force and a secondary set of information) through a single channel of feedback stimulation (vibrotactile via bone conduction) to the human user in a prosthetic application is investigated. The performance of the grasping task is not dependent to the second set of information in this study. Subject performance in two tasks: regulating the grasp force and identifying the secondary information, were evaluated when provided with either one corresponding information or both sets of feedback information. Visual feedback is involved in the training stage. The proposed approach is validated on human-subject experiments using a vibrotactile transducer worn on the elbow bony landmark (to realize a non-invasive bone conduction interface) carried out in a virtual reality environment to perform a closed-loop object grasping task. The experimental results show that the performance of the human subjects on either task, whilst perceiving two sets of sensory information, is not inferior to that when receiving only one set of corresponding sensory information, demonstrating the potential of conveying a second set of information through a bone conduction interface in an upper limb prosthetic task.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32395102
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00348
pmc: PMC7197324
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
348Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Mayer, Garcia-Rosas, Mohammadi, Tan, Alici, Choong and Oetomo.
Références
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Nov 12;19(22):
pubmed: 31726702
Exp Brain Res. 1987;66(1):141-54
pubmed: 3582528
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2016 Jan-Mar;9(1):3-12
pubmed: 26561483
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 Oct 27;8:60
pubmed: 22032545
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1992 Winter;29(1):1-8
pubmed: 1740774
Nat Commun. 2014 Dec 09;5:5747
pubmed: 25490072
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014 Mar;22(2):290-301
pubmed: 23782817
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 Jun;14(6):439-447
pubmed: 28532184
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013 Jan;10(1):45-54
pubmed: 23278223
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul;2019:5322-5325
pubmed: 31947058
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 4;8(1):8541
pubmed: 29867147
J Neural Eng. 2014 Aug;11(4):046001
pubmed: 24891493
Cogn Psychol. 1987 Jul;19(3):342-68
pubmed: 3608405
Ann Biomed Eng. 1980;8(4-6):293-303
pubmed: 7027836
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016 Dec;24(12):1314-1322
pubmed: 26584497
Front Neurosci. 2016 May 12;10:209
pubmed: 27242413
Unfallchirurg. 2017 Apr;120(4):285-292
pubmed: 28229193
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2017 Apr-Jun;10(2):162-172
pubmed: 27775538
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Dec;25(12):2258-2269
pubmed: 28742043
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Feb;89(2):665-71
pubmed: 12574444
Exp Brain Res. 1984;53(2):277-84
pubmed: 6705863
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Sep 3;15(1):81
pubmed: 30176929
Neurosci Lett. 2009 Jun 19;457(1):16-20
pubmed: 19429153
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012 Sep;20(5):663-77
pubmed: 22665514
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014 Sep;22(5):1041-52
pubmed: 24801625
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 28;7:45363
pubmed: 28349945